As the course itself is set out to do, professional development in the area of culturally responsive teaching attempted to address an online achievement gap and the marginalization of some groups. It was important to examine the achievement gap in online courses, in some detail, to understand the impact of background and culture on the effectiveness of online teaching. Naturally, it was also important to be current on statewide and institutional approaches to reducing the achievement gap, as those are approaches we can encourage through our teaching. As noted below, all of that contributed to improvements in my teaching, and provides a framework for further improvement.
I felt that the course, at root, shone a light on the values and norms of our culture that are often invisible. The awareness magnified the myriad ways inequality is built and sustained, and the very practical things we can do to address that inequality in our teaching.
Before beginning this course, cultural differences were not at all something that I accounted for in my course preparation and design. Instead, I strove to make the material as “neutral” as possible, focusing on the subject matter itself as much as I could. More than that, I was also concerned that distance education would impair the ability to adapt to the needs of different students, each of whom brings his or her own background, beliefs, and approach to the class. Distance education, by its nature, leaves less room for that type of spontaneous response.
I was and remain optimistic about the techniques learned through the course on culturally responsive teaching and feel that through implementing them I have narrowed the equity gap. Feedback to students tries to account for my understanding of their position and background. Moreover, I have adjusted my policy on late work. Ironically, although my policy on late work was different in practice than officially (officially, no late work but in fact I generally accepted it) my official policy now more closely matches my desire that the students actually learn the material. Naturally, it is neither possible nor desirable for me to adapt completely to the student’s unique approach as by doing so I would deprive the student of the learning opportunity to understand and accommodate my background and approach. Certainly, that is a learning point for them as well.
I feel that the improvements to my teaching, and honestly beyond that to other types of connections, will be more rich simply from accepting the importance of background and bias. My syllabus and other course materials have been updated, to the extent possible, to account for that. Moreover, I will be more attentive to how culture shapes the principles discussed in my class, recognizing that they too, were shaped by biases that may not be evident to students now.
OLD:
NEW: