Other Educational Programming

Sharing Readings

While Macalester College is a non-profit educational institution, when use of copyrighted materials happens outside of the physical or online classroom and in college-sponsored programs, conference presentations, meetings, or other events, provisions for use allowed by the Classroom Use Exemption (17 U.S.C. § 110 (1)) do not apply. Copying of readings may be allowed, but you have to think about it through the lens of fair use (17 U.S.C.§ 107) 

The EASIEST OPTION - Don't Make Any Copies!

Copyright issues with materials usually arise because you're making copies. So, make life easy on yourself by not making copies.

How can you share materials without making copies?

If you have to make copies to share materials with program participants, you will have to think about whether such copies are already permitted by law, or whether you will need permission from (and usually payment to) the copyright holder.

Fair Use

Fair use (17 U.S.C.§ 107) is a provision in the law that allows some copying without permission or payment. It is sometimes legal to make fair use copies of materials for participants in a non-profit instructional environment. It is also true that not all non-profit instructional copying is a fair use, particularly outside of the literal classroom and the College's formal curriculum.

At Macalester College, program leaders are trusted to make their own reasonable and informed choices about fair use which requires knowing something about how fair use works. Your Research & Instruction Librarians can help you sort through the various options for resource access, including fair use.

Permissions

Sometimes, there is no way to share materials without making copies, and fair use doesn't seem to apply to the copying. Then, you may need permission to make the copies or you may choose to find alternative materials. Library staff can help you obtain permissions for use of materials in Macalester programs. There may be fees involved.

Using Images

Images can be powerful teaching tools, as illustrations to lectures, or for studying concepts outside of the classroom. While Macalester College is a non-profit educational institution, once the use of images moves outside of the physical or online classroom into college-sponsored programs, conference presentations, meetings, or other events, provisions for use allowed by the Classroom Use Exemption (17 U.S.C. § 110 (1)) do not apply. Use of images may be allowed, but you have to think about it through the lens of fair use (17 U.S.C.§ 107)

Display from physical copies is probably okay?

Sometimes uses that seem very similar are treated differently by the law. For example, showing an image in a non-profit face-to-face classroom is permitted by the Classroom Use Exemption, but showing the same image, in a very similar instructional setting that is not technically a formal classroom is not so clearly allowed. Display of images in online instruction, at conferences, in meetings, etc. may be allowed, but under fair use. Most of the time, showing things to participants in an educational program is okay as the social benefits likely outweigh the economic interests of the rights holder, and the scope of the use is limited.

Examples:

Because we are working with fair use and not the Classroom Use Exemption and the TEACH Act, the delivery method is less relevant in that fair use is technology-neutral. The same considerations apply when the program content is delivered online. However the extent of potential market harm may be less clear and online delivery or presentation on the open web may change one’s fair use assessment.

Copying or scanning images

Fair use allows some copying of images for teaching, commentary, and criticism, especially in the non-profit context. It's also likely that not all image copying, even in educational contexts, falls under fair use. Courts haven't done much to interpret how fair use might apply to instructional use of images, but they have allowed fair use copying of images in other contexts, sometimes even commercial ones, especially when accompanied by criticism or commentary.

Posting images online

Sharing images online is also usually a question of fair use. Consider if linking to a legitimate, publicly available image is an option for your needs.

Additional resources on academic image use

The Visual Resources Association has produced a very useful Statement on the Fair Use of Images for Teaching, Research, and Study. The statement articulates the organization's understanding of fair use principles, but it's not legal advice. It's worth the read for anyone whose programming uses a lot of images. It is also of great value for anyone working with images as the subject of their research, or who wants to include images in published materials.

The College Art Association has drawn up a Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for the Visual Arts. This has been welcomed by many in the visual arts teaching and research community. It articulates accepted community practices around writing and teaching about art, and goes beyond to fair use issues in making new art, and in archival and museum uses. In Minnesota, Springboard for the Arts helps artists connect with attorneys to obtain legal advice.

The Association of Art Museum Directors have Guidelines for the Use of Copyrighted Materials and Works of Art by Art Museums, which is a welcome document in succession to their groundbreaking earlier principled documentation of fair use issues in visual arts.

Using Video and Audio in Educational Programming

Showing or “performing” a motion picture or playing pieces of music at Macalester can be important for teaching and other educational activities outside of the classroom. The performance of a copyrighted film must be made with permission from the copyright owner, often obtained through a licensing agreement such as those provided through institutional streaming services and contracts, or obtaining individual public performance rights, or consistent with one of the exceptions or limitations in the copyright law. Music is a little bit different, but many similar concerns apply.

The law provides many opportunities for showing films or playing music at Macalester, but one usually must begin with the following assumptions:

Nevertheless, copyright law includes several possibilities for properly performing copyrighted audiovisual works.

Please note that this discussion is only about the “performance” of the work. Making a copy of all or part of the work must be addressed separately.

Perform a work privately, and not publicly

 A performance may not be “public” if the location is closed to the public, and the audience is not a “substantial” number of persons. Therefore:

How big of a group is "large?" How public is a dorm lounge? These questions are not answered in the law, and are part of the judgement call one needs to make based on each individual situation. Reach out to a Research & Instruction Librarian for guidance and help obtaining permissions if needed.

You can obtain permission

The creator of the work is typically the copyright owner or other rightsholder. In the case of motion pictures, movie studios usually hold rights in the works they create or distribute. Smaller scale documentary films often include information on public performances and screening rights on the film's website, and may be willing to offer low cost performance rights for college screenings. In the case of music, playing and performing music is often covered by blanket licenses purchased by the college from ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC, the major music performance rights management companies.

Perform a work that is in the public domain

Copyright protection does not last forever, and when the copyright has expired, the work may be used without copyright restriction. For example, any work published in the U.S. before 1927 is in the public domain and may be used freely.

The Internet Archive and other organizations facilitate finding and using many films and other works that are in the public domain. Additional sources of films that are in the public domain include: Festival Films; Desert Island Films; Reel Media International; BuyOut Footage; and OpenFlix.

Works created by the federal government are not protected by copyright and are in the public domain. However, works commissioned by the federal government may have copyright protection. Also, works produced by state, local, or foreign governments may have copyright protection. Federal government works in the public domain could include many military films and NASA space exploration footage.

What about streaming media?

Much of the media we use in real life today present some legal wrinkles that "old school" physical media don't.

Online media

Sites like YouTube and Vimeo have Terms of Service that say they are for personal use only. Some even specifically say they are for personal, non-commercial use. Subscription services like Netflix, Amazon Prime, and others also have Terms of Service, almost all of which also limit use to personal and/or non-commercial use. Some have even more specific limitations than that. It's unclear whether the terms of service on a free site, where you never clicked "I Agree", are legally enforceable, but with subscription services, you usually did actively agree to the terms of service at some point.

Is the program you're leading a personal use? No one really knows. Is a program held at a college where students do pay tuition a non-commercial use? Also unclear. Most of the folks who run these services have not directly addressed such issues. Certainly it's common practice to play public online content, such as YouTube videos, in many different public settings, though not all such users may be aware that the terms of use present questions about such uses.

It's important to note that limitations that you agreed to in a service contract or at the time you purchased digital content are not copyright issues. They are contract issues, and so present risks related to your contractual relationship with the provider of the content, such as account termination.

Many program leaders do play YouTube videos during their events, or play music they downloaded from iTunes or stream from Spotify. They may or may not be aware of the contract law issues that those uses present.

Media files like MP3s or movie files

Purchased copies of media files often come with their own terms of use, which you usually agreed to at the time of purchase, and which also usually say the files are for personal and/or non-commercial use only. Again, whether your use is permitted under those terms is an issue of contract law more than copyright.

If the files were not purchased, you may not have to worry about contractual limitations on your use, but you do still have to grapple with the  copyright-law question of whether playing questionably legitimate copies in a program is fair use.

Note: ripping or otherwise digitizing audio or video from source media is quite likely fair use sometimes. But this proposition is contested by media companies, and some media like DVDs and Blu-Rays present additional legal issues related to "anticircumvention" provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

Use fair use

Fair use is a provision in the law (17 U.S.C. §107) that allows some copying without permission or payment. It is sometimes legal to make fair use of music performances or showing films in a non-profit instructional environment. It is also true that not all non-profit instructional display or performance is a fair use, particularly outside of the literal classroom.

At Macalester College, program leaders are trusted to make their own reasonable and informed choices about fair use which requires knowing something about how fair use works. Your Research & Instruction Librarians can help you sort through the various options for resource access, including fair use.