Ch. 2 of John Stuart Mill's On Liberty presents a compelling defense of individual freedom, free expression, and diversity of thought. Since its publication in the mid-19th century, this text has influenced philosophical discourse on university campuses on how these principles shape liberal democracies and inform the rights and responsibilities of individuals within society.
Should any limits be placed on free speech? If so, what are they? Who should decide what the limits are?
Mill states, “he who only knows his side of the case knows little of that.” Why does Mill emphasize the importance of understanding opposing viewpoints? Are there any topics where "both sides" shouldn't be examined?