Embedded Files
Catapult:
Catapult:
During our catapult-building activity, the collaborative exploration of different design concepts within our team significantly enhanced our understanding of creative problem-solving in engineering design. Here’s how:
Diverse Perspectives:
Each team member brought unique ideas and viewpoints to the table.
We considered various approaches, from tension-based designs to lever mechanisms.
This diversity enriched our understanding of problem-solving strategies.
Iterative Prototyping:
We built multiple prototypes, experimenting with different stick arrangements, spoon angles, and release mechanisms.
By testing and refining each version, we learned what worked and what didn’t.
Iteration allowed us to identify optimal solutions through trial and error.
Constraints:
We discussed the dependencies between simplicity, stability, and launch distance.
Balancing stick placement, spoon curvature, and rubber band tension required thoughtful consideration.
Understanding these trade-offs deepened our grasp of engineering design principles.
Team Synergy:
Collaborating fostered a sense of camaraderie and shared purpose.
We brainstormed, debated, and supported one another.
The collective effort led to a more comprehensive understanding of problem-solving dynamics.
Role-Play Activity:
Role-Play Activity:
The collaborative role-play activity between the client and designers significantly impacted the team’s ability to systematically define and approach engineering problems.
Shared Understanding:
Through role-play, the team gained a shared understanding of the project. The client’s perspective and requirements were communicated directly, allowing the designers to grasp the context comprehensively.
Active Listening:
During the role-play, designers actively listened to the client’s needs, concerns, and constraints. This facilitated a deeper understanding of the problem space and helped identify critical objectives.
Iterative Exploration:
The back-and-forth dialogue allowed iterative exploration of potential functions and features. Designers could propose ideas, receive feedback, and refine their approach collaboratively.
Constraint Identification:
By engaging in the role-play, the team proactively identified constraints such as budget, timeline, and technical limitations. These constraints influenced the design decisions and shaped the bot’s functionality.
Objective Alignment:
The role-play clarified project objectives. Designers could align their engineering efforts with the client’s goals, ensuring that the bot’s features directly addressed the desired outcomes.
Holistic Problem Solving: The collaborative nature encouraged holistic problem-solving. Designers considered not only technical aspects but also user experience, ethical implications, and scalability.
Function Tree and Morphological Chart:
Function Tree and Morphological Chart:
The process of identifying functions from both user and designer perspectives significantly influenced the creation of a comprehensive morphological chart. Here’s how:
User-Centric Functions:
By considering user needs and expectations, we identified essential functions that directly impact user experience. These functions became the foundation of our morphological chart.
Constraints and Dependencies:
Constraints like budget influenced function selection.
Dependencies were visualized in the morphological chart.
Holistic View:
The combined input from users and designers ensured a holistic view of the system.
Our morphological chart captured diverse aspects, leading to a comprehensive design space exploration.
The collaborative identification of functions enriched our morphological chart, enabling a systematic exploration of design alternatives for the object tracking bot.
Page updated
Report abuse