"Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) is a framework that helps educators provide academic and behavioral strategies for students with various needs. MTSS grew out of the integration of two other intervention-based frameworks: Response to Intervention (RTI) and PBIS" (PBIS Rewards, 2019).
Response to Intervention (RtI) is a multi-tiered approach that many schools use to help students who are having difficulty with academics or behavior. The goal of RtI is to screen early and deliver supports to students quickly (Response to Intervention (RtI) Fact Sheet for Parents How Does RtI Help Students?, n.d.).
(Lvl 2) (Ohl et al., 2013)
10-week Tier 1 Response to Intervention (RTI) program, led by occupational therapists in collaboration with teachers, to improve fine motor and visual-motor skills in general education kindergarten students.
OT led 10 weekly 30 minute lessons in a kindergarten class to enhance fine motor and visual-motor skills.
3 months post-intervention 75% of teachers were still using the fine motor center with their class
Teachers were more likely to continue the plan and benefited from visual aids, posters, and parent handouts to reinforce concepts taught in OT-led sessions.
(Lvl 3) (Cahill et al., 2014)
AOTA’s sampling for within the early intervention and school based special interest section to determine OTs involvement in MTSS
Questions were designed to examine practitioners’ involvement in MTSS and their attitudes towards it
Many respondents (52.5%) reported they would like to become more involved in MTSS initiatives, but almost half (46.7%) felt their OT expertise was not sufficiently used in MTSS
Lack of resources (e.g., time, finances, personnel) was identified as the biggest barrier to involvement in MTSS
The results suggest that moving from a caseload model to a workload model may support increased participation by practitioners in MTSS initiatives
(Lvl 2) (Bazyk et al., 2009)
The study investigated the effects of fully integrated occupational therapy services on fine motor and emergent literacy outcomes in kindergarteners with and without disabilities
The study used a one-group pretest-posttest descriptive design with 37 kindergarten-age children
Children without disabilities made statistically significant gains in all areas of fine motor and emergent literacy.
Children with disabilities showed significant improvements in two of the fine motor assessments and three of the emergent literacy assessments.
(Lvl 5) (Smith & O’Brien, 2020)
Describes the process for providing occupational therapy services in special education, including referral, evaluation, and intervention
Provides several program examples to illustrate how occupational therapists can contribute to all tiers of MTSS
Schools can use up to 15% of their special education funds for Early Intervening Services (EIS) for students in general education who need additional academic and behavioral support but are not eligible for special education
Occupational therapists may need to transition from a caseload model to a workload model to effectively participate in MTSS
(Lvl 3) (Hintz & Fletcher, 2022)
The study used a qualitative phenomenological approach to describe the lived experiences of teachers working with occupational therapists in an MTSS framework
The study included 13 teachers from four different regions of the United States who had experience working with occupational therapists in an MTSS framework
The study emphasized the value of collaboration between teachers and occupational therapists within the MTSS framework.
Barriers identified included a lack of documentation and a lack of understanding among teachers regarding the scope and role of occupational therapists
The study found a lack of documentation of services, suggesting a need for improved documentation practices by occupational therapists
A rubric is an assessment tool outlining criteria and performance levels of clients. It is used by OT's to track progress and assess performance.
Data Collection
(Lvl 5) (Bazyk, S. et al. n.d.)
RTI implementation rubrics can be used to gather data for an entire classroom, school, and district
OTs can use a multi-tiered approach within school systems to give each student individualized services meeting their specific needs.
Each rubric is broken up into 4 growth stages; emerging, developing, operationalizing, and optimizing.
Variations
(Lvl 5) (RTI implementation rubric: School-level., n.d.).
Rubrics can cover any components needed for classroom and curriculum success, the 6 main components are as follows; problem-solving, curriculum and instruction, assessment, leadership, family and community partnering and positive school climate.
Part of the rubric is a worksheet to grade how the process went and can be used as a resource for OTs during RTI leadership team and IEP meetings at the school.
Types of rubrics can vary, some commonly used rubrics include; handwriting, pencil grasps, fine motor coordination, visual perceptual skills, gross motor skills, levels of arousal, neuromuscular statuses, ADLs, sensory integration skills, and behavioral.
Implementation
(Lvl 5) (U.S. Office of Special Education Programs, 2019).
Rubrics integrated into the classroom can be used to support/define the following; classroom performance, performance expectations, and measure progress on goals.
Rubrics are easy to adapt and integrate into any classroom setting.
They can be used to measure any or all students' performance on classroom tasks.
Summary:
Teachers are more likely to continue fine motor and visual-motor strategies within the classroom when they collaborate through MTSS with OTs and are provided adequate resources, OTs can provide ongoing consultation to support implementation.
Workload model could increase participation in MTSS.
Early intervention through integrated services can be beneficial and potentially prevent the need for long-term special education.
Data collected through progress monitoring is important to change the intensity, frequency, or type of services provided
Teachers support a need for more occupational therapy support within the MTSS framework
The main goal of rubrics is to offer OTs and teachers a tool to guide decision-making.
Occupational therapists can use important tools in determining baselines and monitoring progress throughout the school year.
Occupational therapists can implement rubrics into the classroom that can be used to support/define the following; classroom performance, performance expectations, and measure progress on goals.
References:
Bazyk, S., Michaud, P., Goodman, G., Papp, P., Hawkins, E., & Welch, M. A. (2009). Integrating Occupational Therapy Services in a Kindergarten Curriculum: A Look at the Outcomes. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.63.2.160
Bazyk, S., Berthelette, M., Cahill, S., Frolek Clark, G., Csanyi, C., McCloskey, S., McGuire, B., Ivey, C., Jackson, L., Harrington Kane, E., Olson, L., Polichino, J., Ray, S., Sanchez, S., Schoonover, J., Nanof, T., & Schefkind, S. (n.d.). Aota practice advisory on occupational therapy in response to intervention. AOTA. https://www.aota.org/practice/practice-settings/-/media/e7371c748756467ba101d6966bb98eb2.ashx
Cahill, S. M., McGuire, B., Krumdick, N. D., & Lee, M. M. (2014). National Survey of Occupational Therapy Practitioners’ Involvement in Response to Intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(6), e234. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.010116
Case Smith, J., & O’Brien, J.C. (2020). Occupational therapy for children (8th ed.). Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.
Bazyk, S., Berthelette, M., Cahill, S., Frolek Clark, G., Csanyi, C., McCloskey, S., McGuire, B., Ivey, C., Jackson, L., Harrington Kane, E., Olson, L., Polichino, J., Ray, S., Sanchez, S., Schoonover, J., Nanof, T., & Schefkind, S. (n.d.). Aota practice advisory on occupational therapy in response to intervention. AOTA. https://www.aota.org/practice/practice-settings/-/media/e7371c748756467ba101d6966bb98eb2.ashx
Fidelity of implementation tools: Classroom-level rubric. (n.d.-a).
https://www.cde.state.co.us/sites/default/files/documents/rti/downloads/pdf/rubrics_classroom.pdf
Hintz, L. A., & Fletcher, T. (2022b). Teachers’ Experiences With OT Multitiered Systems of Support: A Qualitative Study. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(Supplement_1), 7610510221p1-7610510221p1. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2022.76s1-po221
Ohl, A. M., Graze, H., Weber, K., Kenny, S., Salvatore, C., & Wagreich, S. (2013). Effectiveness of a 10-Week Tier-1 Response to Intervention Program in Improving Fine Motor and Visual-Motor Skills in General Education Kindergarten Students. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(5), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.008110
PBIS Rewards. (2019). What is MTSS? | A multi-tiered system of supports. PBIS Rewards; Navigate360. https://www.pbisrewards.com/blog/what-is-mtss/
Response to Intervention (RtI) Fact Sheet for Parents How does RtI help students? (n.d.). https://tea.texas.gov/academics/special-student-populations/special-education/rti.pdf
RTI implementation rubric: School-level. (n.d.). https://www.cde.state.co.us/sites/default/files/documents/rti/downloads/pdf/rubrics_school.pdf
U.S. Office of Special Education Programs. (2019). Culturally and linguistically responsive response to intervention within multitiered system of supports: Fidelity of implementation rubric. https://www.mtss4els.org/files/resource-files/CLRT-RTI-Rubric.pdf