In-Home Services
COVID-19 Update: Due to the current health advisory in Hays County, specifically COVID 19, in-home services will not be provided in the home setting. Services will instead be provided remotely, by a certified teacher or paraprofessional familiar with the student and the student's needs. ARD committees should discuss how the student's in-home instruction may be impacted by remote learning and what, if any, adjustments to the IEP may need to be needed.
ARD committees may consider face-to-face in-home services again when the County Health Department declares that Hays County is no longer considered to be a high community transmittal area.
What's Required
For a Texas student with autism eligible for special education and related services, the ARD/IEP Committee must consider all eleven peer reviewed, research-based educational programming practice strategies under §89.1055(e) of the Texas Administrative Code (TAC). In-home/community-based training is one of the eleven strategies or options an ARD/IEP Committee may choose for a student with autism in order for the student to learn or to reinforce social skills in a variety of settings. This practice is to ensure a student with autism who may have difficulty generalizing skills from one environment to another receives needed supports and services. In-home and community-based training (IH/CBT) is a related service that must be considered as one of eleven strategies on the Autism Supplement for a student with autism eligibility, and when needed, addressed in the IEP. While IH/CBT is used to generalize IEP-related social/behavioral skills across settings, such as school-to-home, school-to-community, home-to-community, and community-to-home, it is not an automatic service for a student with an autism spectrum disorder.
In-home training may also be considered for students with other special education eligibility, if the student is exhibiting social/behavioral needs as indicated above.
What We Do
The In-Home Community-Based Training (IH/CBT) consists of four levels:
Level 1 is identification.
Level 2 is intervention.
Level 3 is a formal evaluation.
Level 4 is direct IH/CBT services.
Level 1: Identification of the need for support: There are three criteria for viable alternatives or IH/CBT supports:
a student is able to perform a critical social/behavioral task or skill identified on the IEP in one setting but not across settings. If this is the case, then tier 2 is recommended.
a student is working on a critical skill that can only be acquired if the skill is taught simultaneously in multiple settings. If this occurs, then tier 2 is recommended.
a student is demonstrating a serious safety deficit such as, but not limited to, persistent self-injurious behaviors or running after moving cars. If this is the case, then proceed immediately to Level 3...
Level 2: Campus-based interventions/viable alternatives:
Gather baseline information and data on the critical skills that is not generalizing.
The campus level staff will identify the present level of performance, the current level of learning across settings
Implement necessary campus strategies or viable alternatives
The campus staff will identify appropriate strategies, determine who will implement each strategy, and decide on the frequency and duration of each strategy
Data is collected to determine if the interventions have been effective.
If the data show that the student is making progress and the interventions appear to be effective, then the supports remain in place and progress is monitored across settings.
If the data show that the interventions were not effective in helping the student perform a behavior/social skill previously learned in another environment or the student is not acquiring a critical skill, then proceed to Level 3.
Level 3: Referral for a formal IH/CBT and parent/family training and support evaluation:
Before an evaluation can begin, the campus must submit, to the campus behavior or autism specialist, the following documents:
1. IEP with updated goals and objectives
2. FBA/BIP (if applicable)
3. Campus strategies/viable alternatives documentation (3-6 weeks of progress monitoring)
4. Contact information for teacher, school and parent/guardian including names, addresses and phone numbers
5. Parental Consent for Evaluation
An IH/CBT evaluation will be completed within 60 calendar days of the signed consent for evaluation.
If the evaluator recommends direct IH/CBT and Parent/Family Training services, the goals and objectives will be identified in the evaluation along with recommended time for direct services.
The ARD/IEP Committee will take the recommendations from the evaluation into consideration and determine the amount of direct service time and goals and objectives that need to be addressed during IH/CBT.
Although parent/family training and support is often incorporated into IH/CBT services, goals and objectives will not be written for parent/family training and support services.
...
Level 4: When an ARD/IEP Committee determines a student needs IH/CBT services:
A trainer/educator from the campus, who is familiar with the student, is assigned to provide services.
IH/CBT can take place in the home or in the community where the parent observes the trainer working with the student at least 50% of the time and the trainer observes the parent working with the student at least 50% of the time.
The trainer and the parent/guardian spend an equal amount of time observing each other and assisting the student on the identified IH/CBT goals and objectives.
The first session is primarily spent gathering information about the setting(s) where the sessions will be conducted.
This includes investigating needed materials and methods of instruction.
The parent Acknowledgement of and Agreement to IH/CBT direct services is reviewed with the parent and signed
If the parent refuses to sign the agreement, then services will stop and an ARD/IEP Committee must reconvene to discuss parental concerns.
Sessions will be cancelled if the student is ill or the trainer is absent from duty on the day of the session.
If a student is receiving direct IH/CBT services at the time of the annual ARD/IEP committee meeting, a summary report describing the progress on the objectives and time remaining will be provided to the ARD/IEP Committee
It is the responsibility of the special education case manager/teacher to notify the IH/CBT trainer of the ARD/IEP committee meeting date.
Related Information: