Table of Contents:
In this group we see a general heading for polar curves that don't quite fit in any of the other sections disscussed, yet follow a pattern similar to many that are seen throughout polar function groups. Specifically multi-pedaled curves, and complex shapes derving from them fall into this group.
General Equation is represented in two base forms:
r=a+bcos(nθ)
r=a+bsin(nθ)
Reguardless of whether it is sine or cosine, the varibles still work the same way.
a represents the stretching and shrinking (in terms of radius) of the "petals"
b represents the stretching and shrinking (in terms of radius) of the "petals"
n represents the total number of "petals" that the shape of the graph has, argubly the most intresting of the varibles
Similarly to sine and cosine functions on a rectangular plane, sine and cosine functions have different graphs on a polar plane.
Notice: The cosine function has a rotation of -π/2 radians compared to the sine function
This is shown as the cosine function looks to be the sine function turned on its side, representing the rotation that it underwent
So: a + bsin(nθ+(π/2)) = a + bcos(nθ)
A strange, yet intresting pattern can be found at the .5 interveles in the N value as a varible. Adding 1 from each iteration of this interval, the number of petals represnted increases by two, following a odd number patter from 3 at 1.5 to 5 at 2.5, 7 at 3.5, and so on and so forth. This is perticularly intresting as a pattern as we know that when n is equal to whole numbers that number is the number of petals that are shown on the graph, yet when we do the same intervel between two numbers yet start at a offset of .5 the number of petals completly shifts and becomes a pattern of odd numbers.
Due to the complex nature of the varible of N, and the idea of the drastic changes that occuer throughout the manipulation of this varible, solving for a cartesian equation is nearly impossible, and very impractical. However, specific equations are able to be converted into cartesian, the general case applies for most of these curves.
Changing just a
Changing just b
Changing just k
r = a + cos(3θ)
r = bcos(3θ)
r = 5cos(kθ)
While it is extremely difficult to predict the shape of the curve when k is a fraction, we can sum up what the general shape of the curves through qualitative observations. By our observations, when k is a fraction, the petals are much larger and overlap (as opposed to thinner petals that are symmetrically distributed about the pole).
Not many observations can be made about rose curves in which k is irrational, but we can say that there are probably infinite petals and there does seem to be some kind of symmetry at play.