In-Depth Knowledge of the Primary and Shared Content, Criteria, Rubrics, and Evidence
Knowledge of the Individual’s Current Reality
Observation
Artifact Review
Data Analysis
Jim Knight: The Impact Cycle (Chapter 1&2: Current Reality)
Core Concept: "The Clear Picture of Reality" Knight argues that human beings are terrible at judging their own performance due to "habituation" (we stop noticing what we see every day).
The Problem: A teacher thinks they are asking high-level questions, but reality shows otherwise.
The Solution: Video. Knight uses video not to "catch" teachers, but to give them a "Clear Picture of Reality." You cannot set a goal until you understand where you actually are.
"When we see reality clearly, we are compelled to act. Video cuts through our perceptions and shows us the truth." — Jim Knight
Diane Sweeney: Student-Centered Coaching: The Moves
Core Concept: "Sorting Student Work" Sweeney believes "Understanding" comes from the students, not the teacher. Her "Sorting Protocol" is the gold standard for Artifact Review.
The Move: Instead of asking "How did the lesson go?", the coach spreads student work on the table and sorts it into three piles: Met the Goal, Almost Met, Did Not Meet.
The Result: This provides immediate, undeniable understanding of who learned what.
"Data is not just a spreadsheet. Student work is the most immediate and honest data we have." — Diane Sweeney
Elena Aguilar: The Art of Coaching (Chapter 4: Observation)
Core Concept: "The Lenses of Observation" Aguilar warns against "Confirmation Bias" (seeing what we expect to see). She teaches coaches to use specific Observation Lenses to understand the full context.
The Lenses:
The Behavioral Lens: What are people doing? (Observable actions).
The Emotional Lens: What is the energy in the room? (Apathy, joy, fear).
The Equity Lens: Who is speaking? Who is being disciplined?
The Result: A holistic understanding of the classroom culture, not just the lesson plan.
The Activity: Grab three pieces of student work from the pile. Sort, then continue through the pile.
Pile A (Met): Which specific skill did they master?
Pile B (Almost): What is the one specific thing tripping them up? (Is it vocabulary? Process? focus?)
Pile C (Not Yet): Is this a misconception or a lack of attempt?
The "Understanding" Question: "What is the pattern in Pile B? That is your coaching goal."
*Aligns to Standard 3.2: Using student evidence to determine the coaching goal.
Humans naturally try to make sense of what they observe. For example, if we see a student with their head down, we might assume they are bored. As coaches, we must pause and separate what we actually see from the meaning we assign to it in order to understand the current reality.
Read each statement below and decide: Is it Evidence (Fact) or an Inference (Opinion)?
*Aligns with Standard 3.2- Defining current reality without bias, Standard 2.1 – Facilitates the coaching cycle (Identify, Learn, Improve).
The teacher has weak classroom management.
Answer: Inference (Opinion)
The Fix: I observed 4 students out of their seats during instruction.
The students were confused by the directions.
Answer: Inference.
The Fix: "When asked to start, 6 students raised their hands and asked, 'What page are we on?'"
The teacher gave specific corrective feedback to 3 students ('You need to flip the fraction'), while 5 students received general praise ('Good job').
Answer: Evidence (Fact).
Why: It quotes the exact language used and counts the instances. It avoids the inference of "The feedback wasn't helpful" or "The teacher relies on praise."
The resources above are curated to support your growth as an instructional coach by providing tools, strategies, and examples to strengthen your coaching practice.
If your visitors still have questions, provide contact information or another resource for more help.