Fernando Camou - Co-Chair
Beth Eyres - Co-Chair
Susan Bedker - Information Technology Representative
Michelle Blomberg - Residential Faculty Representative
Justin Burns, Residential Faculty Representative, Team Institutional Research Liaison
Karen Conzelman - Curriculum Representative
Ben Gomez - Admissions and Records Representative
Meghan Kennedy - Center for Teaching, Learning, and Engagement Representative
Jennifer Means - Human Resources Representative
Dawna Kremin - Academic Affairs Representative, Team Web Administrator
Christine Neill - Academic Advisement Representative
LeBrian Patrick - Diversity Committee Representative
Donna Perrigo - Residential Faculty Representative
Deborah Roseke - Academic Affairs Representative
Leslie Sheeler - Admissions and Records Representative, GCC North Representative
Kirt Shineman - Residential Faculty Representative, Assessment Representative
Elizabeth Saliba - College Staffing Advisory Committee Representative
Renee Smith - Library Representative
Adrienne Tabar - Center for Learning Representative
Jackie Witzke - Residential Faculty Representative, Developmental Education Representative
Located to the right is an informational video provided by the Higher Learning Commission that is related to your Criterion and the evidence that might be appropriate to include as you begin drafting the alpha version narrative for the 2022 Assurance Argument. Please take a few minutes to review this video to become familiar with your criterion.
HLC invited institutions to attend webinars on the revised Criteria for Accreditation that go into effect September 2020. Hosted by HLC staff, these webinars walked through the Criteria in detail, with discussions of their content, context, intent, and recent revisions. The sessions also provided some information about the types of evidence institutions might use in their assurance arguments.
These documents are only accessible by criterion team members. All Reaffirmation Team members may view other team documents, but only the respective criterion team can edit these documents.
Click this button to access the Assurance Argument Alpha Version (access required)
This document provided a starting point to criterion teams to review what was submitted in 2016, make comments, and decide what was still relevant for the 2022 Assurance Argument.
Navigate to your team's Alpha Version Assurance Argument by clicking the "Criterion 3 Assurance Argument Alpha Version" button.
Click this button to access the Brainstorm Outline (access required)
This document provides a resource for the team to brainstorm potential arguments, evidence, and questions related to each criterion prior to drafting the assurance argument narrative.
Navigate to your team's Brainstorm Outline by clicking the "Criterion 3 Brainstorm Outline" button.
Click this button to access the Assurance Argument Working Draft (access required)
This document provides teams with a structural outline for framing the Assurance Argument with respect to their criterion. Teams should expand bullets into a narrative form and link appropriate evidence by the end of the 2020-21 academic year.
Navigate to your team's Assurance Argument Working Draft by clicking the "Criterion 3 Assurance Argument Working Draft" button.
As the teams begin collecting evidence, some of these documents may be static (not live links). For example, RFP appendices, staff policy manuals, and other published, formal documents can be placed in this evidence file. Please do not begin PDF printing webpages until Fall 2021, as content may change between now and then.