Filosofia Inter-Disciplinare (FID)

Filosofia Inter-Disciplinare (FID) is a series of bi-monthly online-accessible research events devoted to the exploration of the various ways in which philosophy (and its sub-disciplines, including aesthetics, philosophy of language, metaphysics, social and political philosophy etc.) can interact with other academic disciplines (including experimental psychology, neuroscience, mathematics, computer sciences, political theory, art theory and history etc.). 


FUTURE EVENTS

FID 6

Friday, 13 December 2024, 2pm4pm (CET)

Guido Bonino & Paolo Tripodi (Turin)


TITLE: Academic Success in America: Analytic Philosophy and the Decline of Wittgenstein


ABSTRACT: There is a rather widespread consensus, among historians of philosophy, concerning the decline of Wittgenstein amid recent analytic philosophy. However, the exact import of such a decline, its chronological development, as well as its causes and several other features, are difficult to ascertain with the traditional methods of the history of philosophy. In this talk we apply a distant reading approach, and a variety of other quantitative methods, to provide a more reliable and accurate account of Wittgenstein’s decline. We focus on a corpus consisting of the metadata of US PhD dissertations in philosophy from 1981 to 2010 (although other kinds of data are also taken into consideration), and we try to relate the topic of the dissertation to the success of the candidate in his/her subsequent academic career. The results of this analysis, corroborated by other evidence, allow us to put forth the more reliable and accurate account just hinted at, and at the same time to suggest – as a contribution to external history of philosophy – a plausible mechanism at the basis of the decline itself, notably a process driven by those who controlled the recruitment policies in the philosophy departments.


In person (Sala Martinetti, via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan) / Online


Accessibility info & registration: https://forms.gle/vUwADBM3tHVhZZvQ6 

PAST EVENTS

FID 5

Friday, 8 November 2024, 2pm–4pm (CET)

Yael Peled (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity)


TITLE: Thinking about Thinking about Thinking: Reflections on an Interdisciplinary Philosophy of Language


ABSTRACT: What are the relations between philosophy and interdisciplinarity? Is philosophy merely one among a variety of disciplines in the part-whole relations of interdisciplinary knowledge work? Or does it play a different and more substantive role, in terms of providing epistemic (infra)structures for the purpose of identifying the logic of interdisciplinary inquiry, and its processes, dynamics and trajectories? Does there exist a philosophy of interdisciplinarity, and, if so, what might it – and its constitutive elements - be? Reflecting on the topic of interdisciplinary philosophy of language as a case study, the talk identifies a set of philosophical themes that emerge from the rich nexus between (inter)disciplinary positionality, self-knowledge and knowledge work. 

FID 4

Friday, 18 October 2024, 2pm4pm (CEST)

Sofía Seinfeld (Open University of Catalonia)


TITLE: The Impact of Embodiment in Virtual Reality on Attitudes, Perceptions, and Behaviors


ABSTRACT: When people see and control a life-size virtual body from a first-person perspective in VR, they might experience the illusion that the artificial body is their own real body, a phenomenon known as virtual embodiment. Evidence shows that it is possible to feel embodied in virtual bodies that look drastically different with respect to our own real body in terms of gender, age, and race. In this talk I will discuss how virtual embodiment impacts perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors, being a potentially useful tool for the treatment of intimate partner violence, to reduce racial bias, or to enhance interpersonal skills.

FID 3

Thursday, 27 June 2024, 2pm–4pm (CEST)

Diana Omigie (Goldsmiths)

TITLE: The Role of Epistemic Emotions in Shaping the Music Listening Experience


ABSTRACT: Over the course of a typical music listening episode, most individuals will find their focus switching between the music and other thoughts or actions. In this talk, I will first briefly review what is known about the role of epistemic emotions in aesthetic engagement. I will then present a series of studies demonstrating that the experience of curiosity, and conversely mind-wandering, during music listening is influenced by the heard music’s unfolding structure. Finally, I will present a novel model of time-varying music engagement that seeks to account for how music listening operates in typical real world listening situations, where draws on attention are many. I will end the talk by considering the presented work’s broader implications for empirical aesthetics research and by outlining promising directions for future research.

FID 2


Wednesday, 27 March 2024, 3.30pm–5.30pm (CET)


Daniel Kelly (Purdue)


TITLE: Why is Moral Progress Annoying? Social Change and Affective Friction [joint work with Evan Westra]



ABSTRACT: A heuristic people seem to rely on in everyday life embodies the idea that "people who I find moralistic and preachy are probably wrong and can be safely ignored". While difficult to defend when put so bluntly, this is a recognizable response to, say, the strident vegan, the humorless social justice scold, and the conservative prude. Often deployed with an eyeroll, the underlying intuition seems to be that genuinely important moral arguments will not be annoying, but will ring out with pristine moral clarity; these whiny trifles can be safely dismissed, though.


I will argue that most of the time, the opposite is true, and that we should expect even genuine moral progress to be experienced as annoying. Drawing upon recent insights from the cognitive science and philosophy of norms, I argue that social change generates a misalignment between people's internalized norms, on the one hand, and the social world they inhabit, on the other. This misalignment is experienced as an unpleasant kind of "affective friction". Unpleasant as it is, that affective friction is in no way indicative that the social changes that produce it are not important moral improvements. Eyerolls, it turns out, are morally and epistemically unreliable.

FID 1


Friday, 9 February 2024, 2pm4pm (CET)


Uwe Peters (Utrecht)


TITLE: Hasty (Algorithmic) Generalizations: A Systematic Analysis of Chatbot Science Communication



ABSTRACT: Large language models (LLM) such as ChatGPT have extensive potential as science communicators because they can provide laypeople, governments, and policymakers with easily understandable explanations of scientific findings, thus helping to increase science literacy worldwide. However, it remains unclear whether LLM summaries of scientific texts capture the uncertainties, limitations, and nuances of research, or contain oversimplified texts, omitting qualifiers or quantifiers present in scientific texts. The omission of qualifiers may result in generalizations of scientific findings that are much broader than warranted by the original research, potentially raising significant ethical and epistemic problems (e.g., human users may misinterpret scientific findings). However, the scope and accuracy of the generalizations that LLMs produce in their science communication has not yet been systematically explored. Building (inter alia) on recent philosophical work on generics, we therefore statistically compared the generalizations found in 200 human summaries of scientific texts (i.e., abstracts of scientific articles) with the corresponding 200 summaries produced by four leading LLMs (incl. ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4). This talk presents the preliminary (disconcerting) results of our analyses and highlights normative implications.

Organizers:


Filippo Contesi (Milan/Barcelona) & Elisa Paganini (Milan)




Scientific Committee:


Paolo Babbiotti (Turin), Chiara Brozzo (Birmingham), Laura Caponetto (Cambridge/Milan), Chiara Cappelletto (Milan), Massimiliano Carrara (Padua), Federica Cavaletti (Milan), Pietro Conte (Milan), Filippo Contesi (Milan/Barcelona), Carlotta Cossutta (Milan), Silvia De Bianchi (Milan), Ciro De Florio (Milan Cattolica), Daniel Dohrn (Milan), Jacopo Frascaroli (Turin), Manuel García-Carpintero (Barcelona), Francesco Guala (Milan), Andrea Guardo (Milan), Anna Ichino (Milan), Giorgio Lando (L'Aquila), Teresa Marques (Barcelona), Maddalena Mazzocut-Mis (Milan), John Michael (Milan), Francesca Minerva (Milan), Elisa Paganini (Milan), Andrea Pinotti (Milan), Giuseppe Primiero (Milan), Gemma Schino (Groningen), Enrico Terrone (Genoa), Giuliano Torrengo (Milan)


FID is hosted by the Philosophy Department "Piero Martinetti", Università degli Studi di Milano and PhilTech (Research Center for the Philosophy of Technology), and generously supported by the Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca (PRIN2022 - 2022NTCHYF_003)