Describe your final design here in more detail than the front page. Use your best figures and material from your presentations and report. Include images, renders, and graphs.
Make sure to include a summary of the project's performance. This page should be similar to your executive summary in a webpage format.
This project, conducted under the guidance of UC San Diego’s Advanced Robotics and Controls Lab (ARClab) and funded by the Department of Defense through the Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center (TATRC), aimed to develop a reconfigurable robotic leg for a future hexapod search-and-rescue platform. The goal was to enable the leg to transition between two mechanical configurations—one optimized for high-speed traversal and the other for high-force, load-bearing operation—while supporting the chassis, two robotic arms, and a 90 kg human payload.
To meet these functional requirements, the team selected a 5-bar pantograph linkage architecture. This design offers planar kinematics, high stiffness, and the ability to shift mechanical advantage by adjusting a single ground link actuator. Symmetry and simplicity of control also made the pantograph favorable compared to alternative geometries.
A test bed was constructed to evaluate leg performance under both static and dynamic conditions. Key features included linear bearing rails for constrained actuation, a counterweight system to offset the test bed’s own mass, and a force-torque sensor mounted beneath the foot for measuring ground reaction forces. This modular setup enabled rapid testing of various link configurations and motion profiles.
Based on the simulations performed the greatest stride length will be achieved with augmentation of the driven (A&D) links, and an increase in the max pushing force can be achieved through augmentation of the ground links.
To compare the differences in mechanical advantage achieved from the different length augmentations, all configurations were tested with a foot velocity of .2m/s. In the simulation of the pushing forces the A&D links are shown to have a much more unstable pushing force which would be undesirable in the final robot. The augmentation of the ground link provides both a significant change in mechanical advantage while maintaining a stable force output making it the design with the most viability in a future robot.