The Effect of Teacher Coaching (Meta-Analysis) – Educational Research Review (2018): A landmark meta-analysis of 60 studies found that one-on-one instructional coaching significantly improves teaching quality and student achievement (Taking Teacher Coaching To Scale - Education Next). Notably, “our analysis found that coaching works…improving instruction by as much as the difference between a novice and a 5-10 year veteran teacher”. This research underpins the new coaching tool, showing that sustained, personalized coaching is far more effective than traditional one-size PD.

Jim Knight’s Impact Cycle (Edthena Blog) – A summary of expert Jim Knight’s instructional coaching model, which centers on partnership and teacher choice. It outlines Knight’s Impact Cycle (Identify–Learn–Improve) and the 7 Partnership Principles (equality, voice, choice, etc.) that make coaching conversations successful (Curious about the Jim Knight Coaching Model for Teachers? Let's Break it Down - Edthena). This resource is directly relevant to our tool’s philosophy: treating teachers as equal partners and focusing on goals the teacher values, thereby increasing buy-in and implementation of feedback.

Presentation Slides

Handout

BYU–PSP Study on Positive Reinforcement (2020) – In a large study of 2,536 elementary students, researchers found that classes where teachers used positive reinforcement techniques saw students focus on tasks ~30% more than in classes with fewer positives (Effective Positive Reinforcement in Schools - Veracross). That is a dramatic gain in on-task behavior simply by emphasizing praise and rewards for desired behavior. The study underscores that recognizing students for what they do right (answering questions, helping others, meeting goals) isn’t just a nice thing to do – it has a measurable impact on engagement and time spent learning. It also likely reduces the need for disciplinary actions, as students are preemptively guided toward good conduct.

Effective Praise – Process vs. Person – We’ll discuss how to give praise that encourages a growth mindset. Research by Carol Dweck and others shows praising the process/effort (“Your presentation was great – I can tell you put a lot of work into researching your topic!”) is far more motivating than praising innate ability (“You’re so smart.”). Teachers will practice reframing their praise to be specific (“I really like how you showed your work on these math problems – it shows your reasoning clearly.”) and effort-based. This kind of positive reinforcement tells students their effort matters and is noticed, which drives them to continue working hard even when things get challenging (since they attribute success to effort, not fixed talent). It also avoids the pitfalls of overpraising or giving empty compliments; our goal is authentic recognition that students find meaningful.

Praise Ratios and Classroom Climate – A practical tip from classroom management research is aiming for a 4:1 or 5:1 ratio of positive comments to negative/corrective comments. This doesn’t mean lowering standards or never correcting – it means actively finding and voicing five things going right for each one thing going wrong. Teachers will reflect on their current habits: Do students more often hear what they’re doing wrong than right? How can we increase the positives? Strategies include: use a tally to self-monitor for a day, or set a goal like “make 3 specific praise statements by lunch.” Also, using recognition routines can help – e.g., ending class by acknowledging a few students (“3 Kudos: I want to thank Aiden for helping his partner, shout-out to Jamila for sticking with that tough problem, and applause for the whole class hitting our quiet transition goal today.”). The session will likely demonstrate how a praise-rich environment feels – perhaps by doing a mini roleplay – and contrast it with a criticism-heavy one, letting teachers viscerally notice the difference. Students in a positive environment feel safer and more motivated to meet expectations, effectively “driving motivation” as the session title says.

Beyond Stickers: Sustaining Intrinsic Motivation – One concern with rewards is: Do we risk making students dependent on extrinsic rewards (prizes, points, etc.)? The session will address this by emphasizing gradual fading of extrinsics and fostering intrinsic rewards. In younger grades or for habit-building, tangible rewards (like a homework pass, a small treat, a phone call home) can jump-start motivation. But over time, we pair those with reflective conversations about how the positive behavior benefits the student (e.g., “You should be proud of yourself – see how your studying paid off on the quiz?”). We encourage students praising themselves as well. The long-term goal is internalization: students start to feel the positive behavior is rewarding in itself. For example, initially a student might put more effort into essays to earn a teacher’s praise; eventually, they realize the satisfaction of writing well and the improved grades are their own reward. Teachers will learn that positive reinforcement is not about bribery – it’s about creating a supportive atmosphere where good behaviors and effort are valued, until students value them on their own. This perspective truly goes “beyond compliance.” It’s not just “do this or you’ll get in trouble,” but “do this because it leads to success and we believe in you.”

Presentation Slides

Handout

Understanding the Logic Stage (Trivium) – Friends of Classical Education: Introduces the 3-part classical trivium and defines the logic stage (grades 6–8) as the period when students begin asking “Why?” about everything. At this stage, “children think and analyze critically and learn to argue well by arranging facts into organized statements and arguments” (Friends of Education :: Classical Trivium). This overview highlights the developmental readiness of young teens for formal logic and analytical thinking, setting the stage for the emphasis of this PD.

Teaching the Logic Stage (Susan Wise Bauer) – An excerpt from The Well-Trained Mind by Susan Wise Bauer, explaining that once students have a foundation of facts (grammar stage), they naturally start to seek cause-and-effect relationships. In the logic stage, learners apply logic to all subjects: “the logic of writing includes paragraph construction… the logic of history demands to know why events happened” (Logic Stage (7-8) – Curriculum – John Adams Academies, Inc.). This resource underscores the goal of the logic phase: helping students organize knowledge into coherent, reasoned understanding.

Strategies for Building Logic Skills (CTI Unit) – A curriculum unit titled “Think! Teaching Logic in the Middle Grades” by a teacher fellow (2012). It offers techniques to infuse logical thinking across the curriculum, such as using logic puzzles (analogies, syllogisms, Sudoku), Paideia seminars for Socratic dialogue, and matrix problems (Charlotte Teachers Institute » Think! Teaching Logic in the Elementary or Middle Grades Classroom). The unit’s rationale is that explicit practice with logic helps students become more rigorous and independent in their reasoning—a key objective of the logic phase.

Presentation Slides

Handout

IDEO’s Design Thinking for Educators Toolkit (2nd ed.) – Free toolkit developed with Riverdale Country School. This comprehensive guide adapts the design thinking process specifically for K-12 education. It covers the five phases – Discovery, Interpretation, Ideation, Experimentation, Evolution – with methods and worksheets for each (Design Thinking for Educators | IDEO | Design Thinking). For example, it provides empathy maps for understanding student needs and brainstorming techniques for ideation. The toolkit is meaningful for teachers because it shows how to design solutions in the classroom intentionally and collaboratively. Whether it’s redesigning a classroom layout or solving a school-wide problem, this resource empowers educators to use a designer’s mindset (be optimistic, iterate, keep the end-user in mind) in their practice.

EdSurge – “Teachers Have Great Ideas. Here’s How to Turn Them into Reality.” – By Caitlynn Peetz (2018). Profiles how Gwinnett County Schools used design thinking (via The Teachers Guild) to tap into teachers’ innovations. It describes a process where teachers were encouraged to generate ideas (“How might we…?” challenges), given time and support to prototype them, and saw a dozen of those ideas developed and showcased (Teachers Have Great Ideas. Here’s How to Turn Them into Reality. | EdSurge News). Importantly, teachers learned to fail forward – if something wasn’t working, they analyzed why and improved it. This real-world example shows design thinking in PD: create a culture where teacher-led experimentation is valued and guided through cycles.

Edutopia – “Design Thinking: A Problem-Solving Framework” – Video/article featuring a global studies class (David Lee). Illustrates how design thinking engages students. In the example, students followed the design process to empathize with communities, define a real problem, then prototype solutions – learning both content and creativity. The resource notes that design thinking “is an approach to addressing challenges in a thoughtful and fun way, where you get to apply the 4Cs — collaboration, creativity, critical thinking, and communication” (What Is Design Thinking? | Edutopia) (Empowering Students With Design Thinking - Edutopia). For elective teachers or anyone seeking to increase PBL, this shows the student-facing side of design thinking. It drives home that when students tackle meaningful problems through this framework, their motivation and understanding soar.

Handout

Covey’s 7 Habits – Summary and Principles – A concise summary of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People outlining all seven habits and their core meaning (e.g. Habit 1: Be Proactive – take responsibility; Habit 5: Seek First to Understand – practice empathetic listening) (How Schools Use Covey’s '7 Habits of Highly Effective People'). Emphasizes that these habits are timeless “true north” principles for personal effectiveness (The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People - Leader In Me). This provides a foundational understanding of the character traits we aim to instill in students through the training.

Case Study – A.B. Combs Elementary – TIME Magazine Interview (2008): Stephen Covey discusses how a struggling magnet school in NC used the 7 Habits school-wide and became the #1 magnet school in the U.S. He gives concrete examples of habits in action (students working in teams learned to be proactive, begin with the end in mind, etc.) (The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Schools | TIME). Covey also cites dramatic outcomes at other schools, such as one Illinois school whose reading proficiency jumped from 57% to 90% in one year of implementing the habits. This success story illustrates the potential impact of a habits-centered character program on school culture and academics.

7 Habits as 21st Century Skills – LCM Elementary – An example of a school’s character education page mapping each habit to modern skills and values ( 7 Habits of Happy Kids - La Costa Meadows Elementary ). For instance, Habit 1 (Be Proactive) is tied to initiative and responsibility, and Habit 4 (Think Win-Win) corresponds to teamwork and justice. It shows how teaching the 7 Habits naturally reinforces the “4Cs” (critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity) and social-emotional competencies. This resource helps teachers see the real-world character traits each habit develops in students.

Presentation Slides

Handout

6 Strategies for Building Better Student Relationships. A middle school teacher shares six practical ways to foster trust and rapport with students (e.g. learning names, encouraging personal show-and-tell). These examples illustrate that “positive relationships are the foundation for learning success,” helping create a classroom climate where students feel respected and motivated (6 Strategies for Building Better Student Relationships | Edutopia).

Prioritizing Connection. An ASCD piece introducing two research-backed techniques for strengthening student-teacher bonds: the Establish-Maintain-Restore (EMR) method and the 2x10 strategy. It cites evidence that intentionally cultivating relationships can boost academic engagement by 33% and reduce disruptive behavior by 75% (Prioritizing Connection), and offers guidance on implementing these strategies to build trust and a positive classroom culture.

5 Tips for Connecting With Hard-to-Reach Students. A practitioner guide offering five strategies to break through to “unreachable” students by building genuine connections. From providing noncontingent positive attention to learning each student’s backstory, the tips encourage teachers to “lean in” instead of pulling away from challenging students (5 Tips for Connecting with Hard-to-Reach Students | HMH)—ultimately helping every student feel valued and understood.

Meta-Analysis: Teacher-Student Relationships, Engagement & Achievement. A research summary of 99 studies confirms that positive teacher–student relationships are associated with higher student engagement and better academic performance (New meta-analysis explores the role of teacher-student relationships on student’s engagement and achievement in school – The Chronicle of Evidence-Based Mentoring). This evidence-based review underscores why strong relational connections, alongside good instruction, are critical to students’ success in school.