Presentation Slides

Handout

Faculty Focus – “Educating the Digital Native: Teaching in a Binge-Watching World” – By Sam Bowman (2020). Dispels the myth that teachers must use flashy tech constantly to engage Gen Z. Bowman argues “It’s not about the tech.” While today’s students have grown up with devices, the best way to reach them is still through solid pedagogy and personal connection, not gimmicks (Educating the Digital Native: Teaching Students in a Binge-Watching World | Faculty Focus) . The article cites that focusing too much on ed-tech tools can misdirect teachers from student needs. It encourages a balanced approach: use technology purposefully when it truly enhances learning, but also feel confident using low-tech, interactive strategies (like discussions, hands-on projects) that may actually engage students more deeply. For a classical school, this advice reinforces that our Socratic discussions, debates, and analog skills practice are not antiquated – in fact, they may be an antidote to passive screen consumption, as long as we remain open to tech where it serves our curriculum.

EdWeek – “Digital Distractions in Class Linked to Lower Academic Performance” – Report on a 2022 PISA study. This piece quantifies the challenge: two-thirds of U.S. students said they get distracted by digital devices in class, and minor disruptions like phone notifications or intercom calls can add up to hours of lost learning (The 3 Reasons Why Students Lose the Most Instructional Time). It also notes that even schools with high required hours can lose “hundreds of hours” per year to avoidable interruptions. For teachers, this data underscores why managing the digital environment is crucial. In practical terms, the session might discuss enforcing classroom device policies and designing engaging lessons so students aren’t as tempted to sneak a glance at their phones. The key is to align with classical education’s emphasis on mindful focus by minimizing the fragmented attention that the digital age can foster.

Teachers Guild Medium – “Educator Duo Reflects on How Design Thinking Transformed Their Teaching” – Elsa Fridman Randolph interviewing two teachers (2017). While about design thinking, this reflection contains a powerful point for digital-age engagement: using student-centered design to restructure learning. One teacher noted that when they started treating students as the primary “users” in designing learning experiences (much like a designer would consider the end-user), it was “incredibly liberating” (Educator Duo Reflects on How Design Thinking Has Transformed Their Teaching | by Elsa Fridman Randolph | The Teachers Guild | Medium). They crafted a new interdisciplinary course by co-designing it with students, using iterative experimentation – which kept students highly engaged. The message here is that to engage modern students, we can apply some design thinking: empathize with their interests and needs, involve them in shaping projects, and be willing to try innovative approaches. This doesn’t conflict with classical education; rather, it can make ancient content more accessible. For example, a Latin teacher might design a project where students create digital storyboards of the Aeneid – blending classical content with creative, student-driven output.

HipSocket Blog – “The Importance of a Classical Education in a Digital Age” – Humorous guest post (actually written by AI) that nevertheless makes solid points. It argues that classical education provides a “valuable counterbalance” to the frenetic information overload of the digital era (GUEST POST: The Importance of a Classical Education in a Digital Age (With a Dash of Humor) - Hip Socket). In short, this resource (in a tongue-in-cheek way) reassures teachers that leaning into our classical curriculum – teaching students to analyze literature, discuss big ideas, and reflect on moral lessons – is exactly what digital-native kids need to become well-rounded, grounded individuals. The classical approach is not only compatible with the digital age; it’s an antidote to some of its downsides.

Presentation Slides

Handouts

Implementing Wait Time – Research by Mary Budd Rowe famously showed that when teachers pause 3-5 seconds after asking a question (and after a student’s answer), student responses become longer and more thoughtful, and more students volunteer answers (Providing wait-time for students to process and gain confidence). Simply put, giving students a few seconds to think increases the quantity and quality of responses. This session will encourage teachers to consciously employ “Wait Time 1 and 2” – wait after posing a question, and wait after a student response (instead of rushing to affirm or move on). Practically, this might mean silently counting “one-Mississippi, two-Mississippi, three-Mississippi” after asking the class a question. It may feel awkward at first, but research suggests students will fill that silence with deeper thinking and more hands will go up as a result.

Cold Call (No Hands) Technique – From Teach Like a Champion, Cold Call involves calling on students whether or not they’ve raised their hands. When used positively and routinely, it establishes the norm that every student must be ready to engage (Cold Calling: The #1 strategy for inclusive classrooms - teacherhead). Rather than being punitive, Cold Call is framed as inclusive: “We want to hear from everyone.” For example, instead of asking “Who can tell me…?” and getting a few volunteers, a teacher might say, “I’m going to cold call—everyone think about this question… (wait)... Ok, Maria, let’s start with you.” All students mentally prepare to possibly answer, increasing overall attentiveness (Technique 22: Cold Call - Teach Like a Champion Ch.4). Research indicates this can raise participation from quieter students and make discussions more equitable (with some caveats: a 2019 study noted allowing a small “opt out” or think-pair-share before cold calling can reduce student anxiety while preserving the benefits (Does Cold Calling Work? Here's What the Research Says | Edutopia)). Teachers will practice using Cold Call in a supportive manner – e.g., giving think time, then calling names in a brisk, unpredictable manner to keep everyone on their toes.

All-Student Response Systems – One way to manage responses is to ensure every student responds to every question, not just one. Low-tech methods work great: for example, using mini whiteboards or index cards. Instead of oral answers from one student, pose a question and have everyone write their answer and hold it up. This way, the teacher can rapidly see every student’s understanding, and no one can opt out. As Edutopia notes, using whiteboards in place of hand-raising means “long gone are the days of students hiding or avoiding answering – the expectation becomes that all students participate in every question.” (Low-Tech Student Participation Tools Increase Participation | Edutopia). This boosts engagement and accountability. The session might have teachers simulate a mini-whiteboard activity and discuss logistics (like setting norms for quick drawing/writing and showing answers simultaneously). Digital polling tools (like Kahoot or PollEverywhere) can serve a similar function in a 1:1 device environment, but often analog is just as effective and faster. The big idea: when everyone responds, formative assessment data improves and students stay active, plus it normalizes mistakes as part of learning (because everyone’s answer is on display in some form, not just one student under the spotlight).

Think-Pair-Share – This classic cooperative strategy will be reviewed as a means to increase response opportunities. In Think-Pair-Share, every student first thinks of an answer, then pairs with a neighbor to discuss, then some share out to the whole class. Research shows TPS “gives all students the opportunity to think and talk about ideas,” often increasing participation from shy students and improving confidence in answers (Reconsidering the Share of a Think–Pair–Share: Emerging ...). It also tends to produce more in-depth responses, since students refine their thoughts in the pair discussion. Teachers will consider when to use TPS (for higher-order questions especially) and how to manage the sharing phase (e.g., randomly selecting a few pairs to share what they discussed, rather than whoever volunteers). By incorporating TPS regularly, teachers ensure that for every question posed, 100% of students have processed an answer and voiced it to at least one peer. This makes classwide discussion richer and engages those who might otherwise stay silent.

Presentation Slides

Handouts

Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (Teacher Magazine) – Instructional scaffolding is rooted in Vygotsky’s theory that learning is a social process and that with guidance, a student can accomplish more. The ZPD is defined as the gap between what a learner can do alone and what they can do with help (The importance of instructional scaffolding). This article explains that scaffolding “activates” the ZPD by teaching material just beyond the student’s current ability and providing support to bridge the gap. As a result, any child—given the right scaffold—can succeed in mastering a skill or concept that initially challenged them. It also notes that scaffolding isn’t just academic support but builds student confidence and motivation to tackle harder tasks.

Definition of Instructional Scaffolding (IRIS Center) – “Just like the scaffold around a building, these supports are temporary and adjustable. As students master the task, the supports are gradually removed.” (Page 1: What Is Instructional Scaffolding?). In this online module, teachers learn the essence of scaffolding: initially, the teacher has full responsibility (much like holding a baby’s hands as they learn to walk), but over time the student takes on more of the work until they can perform independently. The IRIS resource also identifies types of scaffolds—content scaffolds (e.g. selecting easier material to begin with), task scaffolds (breaking an assignment into steps), and material scaffolds (graphic organizers, cue cards, etc.)—with tips on when and how to use each.

“6 Scaffolding Strategies to Use With Students” (Edutopia) – This teacher-friendly article (Rebecca Alber) offers practical scaffolding techniques and clarifies the difference between scaffolding and differentiation. Scaffolding means breaking learning into chunks and providing a tool or structure with each chunk (for example, pausing a reading to discuss key vocabulary or using a graphic organizer) (6 Scaffolding Strategies to Use With Your Students | Edutopia). Differentiation, on the other hand, might mean actually modifying the task for different learners. The article suggests strategies like tapping into prior knowledge with a “KWL” chart, modeling thought processes by thinking aloud, using visual aids, and “checking for understanding” frequently. All these techniques align with scaffolding research by meeting students at their current level and nudging them forward with support, then easing off as they gain confidence. 

Presentation Slides

Handout

“Not Just Group Work – Productive Group Work!” – Edutopia – By Andrew Miller (2014). Outlines essential elements for effective group work: a clear intention for the group task, intentional grouping (heterogeneous vs. homogeneous, decided with purpose), explicit norms and individual accountability (Not Just Group Work -- Productive Group Work! | Edutopia) (Not Just Group Work -- Productive Group Work! | Edutopia). Miller reminds teachers that productive collaboration doesn’t happen by accident – all students need to understand the goal and their role. For instance, he suggests pre-determining whether groups are mixed-ability (to support peers) or same-ability for a challenge, and making sure the task is structured so that “there is no group work without work”.

NEA Article – “Building a Culture of Classroom Collaboration” – By James Paterson (2021). Emphasizes that preparation and classroom culture are key to effective group work. Teachers should lay out procedures and respect norms from day one because “effective group work requires careful preparation and a culture of collaboration as well as ongoing guidance from teachers” (Building a Culture of Classroom Collaboration | NEA). The article cites research that collaboration helps students learn more deeply and develop lifelong skills. It provides examples, such as a teacher using virtual breakout rooms during remote learning – leveraging students’ social need to connect as an entry point to collaborative academic work. The big idea: strong relationships and clear expectations enable students to tackle rigorous tasks together rather than simply dividing work.

Washington University CTL – “Using Roles in Group Work” – Assigning specific roles (facilitator, recorder, spokesperson, checker, etc.) can make group work more structured and equitable. This resource explains how roles combat common issues like unequal participation and gender stereotyping (e.g. without guidance, girls might end up doing the notetaking) (Using Roles in Group Work - Center for Teaching and Learning) (Using Roles in Group Work - Center for Teaching and Learning). It provides a model from the POGIL method with classic roles (Manager, Recorder, Presenter, Reflector) and suggests additional roles teachers can adapt. By rotating and monitoring these roles, teachers ensure all students contribute meaningfully and build a variety of collaboration skills.

Elfie Israel’s Definition of Socratic Seminars (ReadWriteThink) – While focusing on discussion-based group work, this succinct definition applies broadly: in a well-structured collaborative activity, students listen closely to each other, think critically, articulate their own ideas, and respond civilly to peers’ ideas (Socratic Seminars | Read Write Think). The emphasis is that students learn to “work cooperatively and to question intelligently and civilly.” This is the gold standard for group interactions. Bringing these principles into any group task – whether it’s a lab in science or a team project in an elective – can make the experience more meaningful. It shifts group work from simply dividing tasks to truly dialoguing and learning from one another, which is the ultimate goal of collaborative learning.

Presentation Slides

Handouts

Rosenshine’s Principles of Instruction – Independent Practice – Barak Rosenshine’s research found that “students need extensive, successful independent practice in order for skills and knowledge to become automatic.” (Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies That All Teachers Should Know, by Barak Rosenshine; American Educator Vol. 36, No. 1, Spring 2012, AFT ). In other words, practice makes permanent – but only if students are practicing correctly. Rosenshine notes that effective teachers ensure about an 80% success rate during practice (not too easy, but avoiding frustration) and continue to monitor students as they work. This means in class, circulating to catch errors (and re-teach if needed), and for homework, designing practice that students can mostly do on their own. The key is quality and correctness of practice, not just quantity. This research-backed principle reminds us to assign independent tasks only after sufficient guided practice – when students are ready – so that practice reinforces learning rather than ingraining mistakes.

Scaffolded Practice (Worked Examples Research) – A study cited by Rosenshine showed that giving students alternating worked examples and problems during independent practice led to greater success (Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies That All Teachers Should Know, by Barak Rosenshine; American Educator Vol. 36, No. 1, Spring 2012, AFT ). For instance, instead of a worksheet of 10 new problems, give 5 problems interspersed with 5 fully worked solutions to similar problems. Students can study the example, then attempt the next problem, which helps them correct their approach. This approach is very applicable in math and science electives – it keeps practice “meaningful” by teaching during practice. The broader idea is to gradually remove supports: start with heavy guidance and examples, then slowly increase independence as proficiency grows. Teachers in the session might consider providing answer keys or partially completed models for homework so that students can self-check and learn from the practice, not just grind through it.

Align Independent Work with Lesson Aims (No “Busyness” Tasks) – Independent practice should directly reinforce the day’s learning objectives. If students learn scales in music class, the independent practice is to practice those scales – not an unrelated music theory crossword. Research by Clark & Starr (and echoed in Rosenshine’s writing) warns against assignments that don’t match what was taught (Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies That All Teachers Should Know, by Barak Rosenshine; American Educator Vol. 36, No. 1, Spring 2012, AFT ). Students find such work meaningless and frustrating. Thus, meaningful practice means continuing the same skill or knowledge in a new context or deeper iteration. One check: if a student can’t see how their homework connects to class, it might not be meaningful. Keeping a clear throughline makes practice time well-spent and not perceived as arbitrary busywork.

Encouraging Retrieval and Review – One of the most powerful forms of independent practice is retrieval practice – actively recalling information from memory. Rather than having students reread notes passively, teachers can make practice more effective by incorporating self-quizzes, flashcards, or summary writing. Cognitive science research (Karpicke & Roediger, 2008) shows that when students regularly practice recalling information (even without looking at notes), they significantly improve retention versus only reviewing notes. For example, a history teacher might assign students to spend 10 minutes writing everything they remember about a topic, then check their notes for what they missed – this engages the brain far more. Similarly, spacing out practice (weekly cumulative reviews or monthly review homework) taps into the spacing effect to strengthen learning. The bottom line: meaningful practice often involves remembering and using knowledge, not just re-reading it. Teachers are encouraged to integrate retrieval techniques into homework (like using online quiz tools or old-fashioned flashcards) to boost long-term mastery.

Monitor, Motivate, and Make it Achievable – Independent practice shouldn’t mean “left on your own.” Meaningful practice is monitored and supported by the teacher over time. Here's a few M’s to remember:

• Monitor: Collect homework and seatwork feedback. As Rosenshine noted, students stayed more engaged when teachers circulated during independent seatwork. Likewise, scanning homework and giving quick feedback or using tools like exit-ticket quizzes can keep practice on track.
  
  

• Motivate: Use positive reinforcement to encourage practice. Studies show that when teachers praise effort on assignments (“I can tell you put a lot of effort into this problem set!”) (Effective Positive Reinforcement in Schools - Veracross) and recognize improvements, students develop more self-efficacy and are more likely to do practice work. Also, explaining the why behind practice (e.g., “This drill will make your fingers stronger for the recital piece”) increases buy-in.

• Make it Achievable: Ensure independent practice is at the right difficulty. If too hard, students give up (or resort to cheating); if too easy, it’s a waste of time. Aim for that ~80% success zone and differentiate when needed (some students might need a modified task to practice the same skill). Giving students tools to succeed independently – like reference examples, access to online help, or the ability to ask a question the next day – keeps practice meaningful and not discouraging.

Presentation Slides

Handout

Harnessing Movement to Boost Learning – NJ Alternate Route Blog (2024): Summarizes research showing that “kinesthetic activities improve concentration, reduce stress, and boost memory” for learners of all ages (Teachers Can Harness the Power of Movement to Boost Student Learning | NJ Alternate Route Rutgers University). Offers practical ideas (like stretch breaks and hands-on tasks) and teacher testimonials on incorporating movement to increase engagement and differentiate instruction for varied needs.

What Research Says About Differentiated Learning – ASCD Education Update: An overview of foundational research on differentiated instruction, noting positive results in classrooms that fully implement differentiation. It cites studies in which tailoring content and grouping to student needs yielded higher achievement, especially for students with learning difficulties (What Research Says About . . . / Differentiated Learning. This resource reinforces why adapting lessons for different learners is critical.

IRIS Module: Differentiated Instruction – An online teacher toolkit from Vanderbilt University that guides educators in differentiating content, process, and product to meet all learners’ needs. Includes strategies for assessing student readiness, flexible grouping, and scaffolding within lessons. This evidence-based module (est. 3 hours) provides interactive scenarios and tips for managing a differentiated classroom.

Station Rotation: Differentiating with Movement (Video) – Edutopia “Schools That Work” case study of a school using rotation stations to vary instruction. In the video, teachers combine hands-on, collaborative, and digital activities at different stations, allowing students to move physically and engage in tasks of varying complexity (Station Rotation: Differentiating Instruction to Reach All Students | Edutopia). The approach makes differentiation manageable for one teacher and has been linked to improved achievement and enthusiasm for learning.