The Philippines faces a wide array of challenges across political, economic, cultural, and social domains. These issues are deeply interconnected, often stemming from historical legacies, colonial influences, and global pressures. By drawing on the ideas of Ernest Renan, Benedict Anderson, and Claro M. Recto, we can propose nationalist solutions that not only address these challenges but also foster unity, progress, and resilience. Each thinker provides a unique lens through which we can analyze and tackle the pressing problems facing the nation today.

1. Political Challenges: Corruption, Weak Governance, and Threats to Democracy

The Philippines continues to grapple with systemic issues such as corruption, weak governance structures, and threats to democratic institutions. These challenges undermine public trust in government and hinder national development. Renan, Anderson, and Recto offer complementary insights into how nationalism can be leveraged to address these issues.

Renan’s Moral Commitment: Accountability and Transparency

Renan emphasizes the moral obligation of citizens to prioritize the welfare of the nation above personal or factional interests. In the context of Philippine politics, this principle calls for a culture of accountability and transparency. Corruption erodes public trust and diverts resources away from essential services like education, healthcare, and infrastructure. A nationalist approach demands that citizens hold leaders accountable by demanding stricter enforcement of anti-corruption laws, supporting investigative journalism, and participating in grassroots movements that advocate for good governance.

For example, Renan’s idea of moral responsibility can inspire civic organizations to monitor government spending and expose unethical practices. Initiatives like the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) can be strengthened to ensure that citizens have access to government data, enabling them to make informed decisions and demand transparency.

Anderson’s Shared Narratives: Civic Education and Collective Responsibility

Anderson’s concept of shared narratives highlights the role of history and collective identity in fostering unity and collective responsibility. In the Philippines, civic education programs can play a crucial role in promoting awareness of the nation’s struggles for independence and democracy. By teaching students about the sacrifices of national heroes like José Rizal, Andres Bonifacio, and Emilio Aguinaldo, schools can instill a sense of pride and responsibility in young Filipinos.

Moreover, Anderson’s emphasis on shared symbols can be used to strengthen national identity. For instance, celebrating events like Independence Day, People Power Revolution, and National Heroes Day can serve as reminders of the nation’s democratic values and the importance of safeguarding them. These celebrations can include activities like essay-writing contests, debates, and community dialogues that encourage critical thinking about governance and citizenship.

Recto’s Political Sovereignty: Reducing Foreign Interference

Recto’s advocacy for political sovereignty underscores the need to reduce foreign interference in domestic affairs. In the Philippines, foreign powers often exert influence through unequal trade agreements, military alliances, and economic policies that favor multinational corporations over local industries. A nationalist government must resist such external pressures and prioritize the interests of its citizens.

One proposed solution is to establish an independent body tasked with reviewing international agreements and ensuring they align with national priorities. Additionally, Recto’s principles call for empowering local leaders and communities to take charge of decision-making processes, reducing reliance on external actors. This can be achieved through decentralization policies that give more autonomy to local governments, enabling them to address regional needs effectively.

Proposed Solution: Anti-Corruption Campaign and Civic Education Program

A comprehensive anti-corruption campaign could involve:

• Launching a nationwide initiative called "Bayanihan Para sa Kaunlaran" (Bayanihan for Progress) to promote transparency and accountability.

• Creating a digital platform where citizens can report corrupt practices anonymously.

• Partnering with schools and universities to integrate civic education into curricula, focusing on topics like democracy, human rights, and the importance of active citizenship.

2. Economic Challenges: Inequality, Unemployment, and Dependence on Foreign Investments

Economic inequality remains one of the most pressing issues in the Philippines, exacerbated by unemployment, poverty, and reliance on foreign investments. Renan, Anderson, and Recto provide valuable insights into how nationalism can drive inclusive economic growth and reduce dependence on external forces.

Renan’s Collective Will: Collaboration for Inclusive Policies

Renan’s emphasis on collective will encourages collaboration between the government, private sector, and citizens to create inclusive economic policies. Addressing economic inequality requires a concerted effort to bridge disparities in income, education, and opportunities. For instance, rural areas often lack access to basic infrastructure like roads, electricity, and internet connectivity, limiting their ability to participate in the economy.

A nationalist approach would prioritize inclusive development by investing in rural infrastructure, providing subsidies to farmers and fishermen, and creating job opportunities in underserved regions. Programs like the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) can be expanded to include skills training and entrepreneurship workshops, empowering beneficiaries to become self-reliant.

Anderson’s Equality: Bridging Regional Disparities

Anderson’s principle of equality emphasizes the need to ensure that economic opportunities are accessible to everyone, regardless of region or social class. In the Philippines, regional disparities are stark, with Metro Manila receiving the lion’s share of investment while other regions lag behind. To address this imbalance, the government can adopt policies that promote balanced regional development.

For example, special economic zones can be established in provinces outside Metro Manila to attract businesses and create jobs locally. Additionally, Anderson’s focus on shared consciousness can be applied by using media campaigns to highlight success stories from different regions, fostering a sense of pride and encouraging interregional cooperation.

Recto’s Economic Independence: Supporting Local Industries

Recto’s vision of economic nationalism advocates for prioritizing local industries and resources over foreign exploitation. The Philippines has abundant natural resources, yet many sectors remain underdeveloped due to reliance on imported goods and foreign investments. A nationalist agenda would involve:

• Providing subsidies, tax breaks, and low-interest loans to small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

• Promoting "Buy Local" campaigns to encourage consumers to support Filipino-made products.

• Enacting protectionist policies to shield local industries from unfair competition.

Proposed Solution: Nationwide SME Support Initiative

A nationwide initiative called "Sulong Lokal: Empowering Filipino Entrepreneurs" could include:

• Training programs for skills development in sectors like agriculture, manufacturing, and technology.

• Online marketplaces that connect Filipino entrepreneurs with buyers both locally and internationally.

• Partnerships with financial institutions to provide affordable credit options for SMEs.

3. Cultural Challenges: Globalization and the Erosion of Filipino Identity

Globalization poses a significant threat to Filipino culture, language, and traditions, as foreign influences often overshadow local identity. Renan, Anderson, and Recto offer strategies to preserve and promote Filipino heritage amidst these challenges.

Renan’s Shared Heritage: Celebrating Indigenous Cultures

Renan’s concept of shared heritage encourages the celebration and promotion of indigenous cultures, languages, and traditions. In the Philippines, there are over 100 languages and countless cultural practices that reflect the nation’s rich diversity. However, globalization and urbanization have led to the erosion of these traditions, particularly among younger generations.

To counteract this trend, the government and civil society can organize festivals, museum exhibits, and educational programs that celebrate indigenous cultures. For example, the National Commission for Culture and the Arts (NCCA) can partner with local communities to document and preserve traditional practices, ensuring they are passed down to future generations.

Anderson’s Cultural Symbols: Amplifying Filipino Voices

Anderson’s focus on cultural symbols highlights the role of media and technology in amplifying Filipino voices and stories. Digital platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram can be used to showcase Filipino art, music, literature, and cuisine to a global audience.

For instance, campaigns like #ProudlyPinoy can encourage Filipinos to share their cultural experiences online, fostering a sense of pride and belonging. Schools can also incorporate lessons on Filipino literature and history into their curricula, ensuring that students appreciate their cultural roots.

Recto’s Cultural Preservation: Protecting Heritage Sites

Recto’s principle of cultural preservation calls for enacting laws to protect cultural heritage sites and funding programs that teach regional languages in schools. Many historical landmarks in the Philippines are at risk of deterioration due to neglect or commercial development.

A proposed solution is to establish a National Cultural Heritage Fund , financed by public and private contributions, to restore and maintain heritage sites. Additionally, schools can introduce mandatory courses on regional languages and dialects, ensuring that students remain connected to their linguistic heritage.

Proposed Solution: National Cultural Heritage Fund

The fund could finance projects such as:

• Restoring historical landmarks like Intramuros, Barasoain Church, and Banaue Rice Terraces.

• Producing documentaries and educational materials about Filipino history and culture.

• Organizing annual cultural festivals that bring together diverse ethnic groups.

4. Social Challenges: Poverty, Inequality, and Lack of Access to Education

Social issues like poverty, inequality, and lack of access to education require urgent attention. Renan, Anderson, and Recto provide frameworks for addressing these challenges through community cooperation, inclusivity, and empowerment.

Renan’s Moral Responsibility: Fostering Bayanihan

Renan’s emphasis on moral responsibility fosters a culture of bayanihan (community cooperation), encouraging Filipinos to work together to address social inequalities. For example, volunteer programs can be organized to build houses for homeless families, distribute food packs to marginalized communities, and provide free medical services in rural areas.

Anderson’s Unity Amid Diversity: Celebrating Ethnic Diversity

Anderson’s principle of unity amid diversity promotes inclusivity by celebrating the diversity of Filipino ethnic groups while emphasizing shared values. This approach can help bridge divides and build solidarity among communities. For instance, schools can host cultural exchange programs where students learn about the traditions of different ethnic groups, fostering mutual respect and understanding.

Recto’s Empowerment: Investing in Education and Healthcare

Recto’s focus on empowerment highlights the importance of investing in education and healthcare to uplift marginalized communities and reduce poverty. Scholarships, vocational training programs, and improved healthcare services can transform lives and break the cycle of poverty.

Proposed Solution: Expanded Scholarship and Healthcare Programs

A nationwide initiative called "Kabataang Pinoy: Building a Brighter Future" could include:

• Expanding scholarship programs for underprivileged students, particularly in STEM fields.

• Establishing mobile clinics to provide free healthcare services in remote areas.

• Partnering with NGOs and private companies to fund community-based projects.

Conclusion: Building a Stronger Nation Through Nationalism

In conclusion, the ideas of Renan, Anderson, and Recto provide a comprehensive framework for understanding nationalism and addressing contemporary challenges. By fostering unity through shared history, promoting cultural identity through shared symbols, and prioritizing economic and political sovereignty, Filipinos can work together to overcome the challenges of today and build a brighter future.

Whether through policy reforms, community initiatives, or individual actions, nationalism remains a powerful force for progress and unity. By applying these principles, the Philippines can pave the way for a more inclusive, resilient, and prosperous nation.

The Philippines faces a myriad of challenges in the political, economic, cultural, and social spheres. To address these issues effectively, it is essential to draw on the theoretical foundations of nation and nationalism. This paper explores how the ideas of Ernest Renan, Benedict Anderson, and Claro M. Recto can be applied to understand and propose solutions to these contemporary problems. By examining their key principles, we can develop a comprehensive framework for addressing the nation's issues through nationalist solutions.

Nationalism, as a political ideology, emphasizes the interests and culture of a particular nation. It is often associated with the desire for self-determination and the preservation of cultural heritage. Understanding the theoretical foundations of nationalism helps in comprehending its impact on contemporary political and social issues. The rise of nationalism has been a response to various historical and social contexts, including colonialism, globalization, and the quest for identity.

This paper will delve into the perspectives of three influential thinkers: Ernest Renan, who emphasized the spiritual and voluntary aspects of nationhood; Benedict Anderson, who introduced the concept of imagined communities; and Claro M. Recto, who championed Filipino nationalism and independence. By examining their ideas, we can gain a deeper understanding of the principles that underpin nationalism and the stances that nationalists should adopt on various issues. Their contributions provide a comprehensive framework for analyzing the complexities of nationalism in both historical and contemporary contexts.

Ernest Renan's Concept of Nation

Ernest Renan, a French historian, delivered a seminal lecture titled "What is a Nation?" in 1882. Renan's ideas were revolutionary, as he argued that a nation is not defined by race, language, or religion, but by a shared history and collective memory. His perspective challenged the traditional notions of nationhood that were prevalent in the 19th century. Renan's approach to nationalism was rooted in the belief that a nation is a spiritual entity, formed by the collective will of its people.

Renan's key principles of nationalism include the idea that a nation is a "daily plebiscite," meaning that the existence of a nation depends on the continuous consent of its people. This concept highlights the importance of collective will and the active participation of citizens in the life of the nation. Renan also emphasized the role of collective memory and forgetting in the formation of a nation. He believed that nations are built on shared experiences and the ability to move past historical grievances. This process of selective memory is crucial for maintaining national unity and cohesion.

Furthermore, Renan rejected the idea that race, language, or religion alone could define a nation. Instead, he believed that a nation is a spiritual principle, a shared sense of belonging that transcends ethnic and religious differences. This inclusive approach to nationhood underscores the importance of unity and solidarity among diverse groups within a nation. Renan's ideas remain relevant today as societies grapple with issues of identity and integration. His emphasis on the voluntary and consensual nature of nationhood provides a valuable perspective for understanding the dynamics of modern nationalism.

Benedict Anderson's Imagined Communities

Benedict Anderson, a political scientist, introduced the concept of "imagined communities" to explain the origins of nationalism. According to Anderson, nations are socially constructed communities, imagined by the people who perceive themselves as part of that group. His work has had a profound impact on the study of nationalism and identity. Anderson's theory provides a framework for understanding how national identities are formed and sustained through shared symbols and narratives.

Anderson argued that a nation is an imagined political community because the members of even the smallest nation will never know most of their fellow members, yet they share a sense of comradeship. This sense of belonging is fostered through shared symbols, rituals, and narratives that create a collective identity. Anderson's concept of imagined communities emphasizes the role of imagination and perception in the formation of national identity. The idea that nations are imagined highlights the constructed nature of national identities and the role of cultural and social processes in their creation.

One of Anderson's key contributions is his analysis of the role of print capitalism and media in the rise of nationalism. He highlighted how the proliferation of printed materials in vernacular languages helped create a shared national consciousness. The spread of a common language through print media unified disparate groups into a single national community. Anderson's insights into the impact of language and communication on national identity are particularly relevant in today's globalized world. The role of media in shaping national consciousness continues to be a critical factor in the development and maintenance of national identities.

Claro M. Recto's Nationalist Ideals

Claro M. Recto, a Filipino statesman, was a prominent advocate of Filipino nationalism. His ideas were rooted in the struggle for independence and sovereignty from colonial and neo-colonial influences. Recto's nationalism was shaped by the historical context of the Philippines' fight for freedom from foreign domination. His vision for the Philippines was one of self-reliance and self-determination, where Filipinos could chart their own destiny without external interference.

Recto was a staunch advocate for Philippine independence and sovereignty. He believed that true nationalism required the rejection of foreign control and influence. Recto's vision for the Philippines was one of self-reliance and self-determination, where Filipinos could chart their own destiny without external interference. His advocacy for independence was not just political but also cultural and economic. Recto's emphasis on sovereignty extended to all aspects of national life, including the economy, culture, and politics.

Recto critiqued both colonial and neo-colonial influences, arguing that they hindered the development of a truly independent national identity. He emphasized the importance of economic independence and the nationalization of key industries to ensure that the benefits of economic growth were enjoyed by Filipinos. Recto's ideas highlight the interconnectedness of political, economic, and cultural dimensions of nationalism. His vision for a nationalist Philippines remains relevant as the country continues to navigate its post-colonial challenges. Recto's emphasis on economic independence and national pride continues to resonate in contemporary discussions about national development and sovereignty.

Comparative Analysis of Renan, Anderson, and Recto

While Renan, Anderson, and Recto had different approaches to nationalism, their ideas share some common themes. All three thinkers emphasized the importance of a collective national identity and unity. They believed that a strong sense of belonging and solidarity among the people is essential for the stability and prosperity of a nation. Their perspectives highlight the need for inclusive and cohesive national identities that can accommodate diversity and foster social cohesion.

Renan, Anderson, and Recto also rejected the idea that ethnicity or religion alone could define a nation. They argued for an inclusive approach to nationhood that transcends ethnic and religious differences. This inclusive nationalism is crucial in fostering social cohesion and preventing divisions within a society. Their ideas underscore the importance of unity in diversity. By promoting an inclusive national identity, they aimed to create a sense of belonging that could unite people from different backgrounds and foster a shared sense of purpose.

Despite these similarities, there are notable differences in their approaches. Renan focused on the role of collective memory and forgetting in the formation of a nation. Anderson highlighted the role of print capitalism and media in creating imagined communities. Recto emphasized political and economic independence as essential components of nationalism. These differences reflect the diverse contexts and challenges that each thinker addressed in their work. While Renan's ideas were shaped by the European context of the 19th century, Anderson's work was influenced by the global spread of print media, and Recto's nationalism was rooted in the anti-colonial struggles of the Philippines.

Stances on National Issues and Problems

The stances on national issues and problems that a nationalist should hold can be informed by the ideas of Renan, Anderson, and Recto. Renan believed in the importance of an inclusive national identity that transcends ethnic and religious differences. He emphasized the role of education and civic engagement in fostering a sense of national unity. Renan's perspective highlights the need for inclusive policies and practices that promote social cohesion. Nationalists should advocate for educational programs that emphasize shared history and values, and for civic initiatives that encourage active participation in national life.

Anderson argued that media plays a crucial role in shaping national identity and consciousness. He highlighted the influence of media on national identity and the challenges posed by globalization and cultural homogenization. Anderson's views underscore the importance of media literacy and the need to preserve cultural diversity in the face of globalizing forces. Nationalists should advocate for policies that support diverse media landscapes and protect cultural heritage. By promoting media literacy and supporting diverse media, nationalists can help ensure that national identities are not eroded by global cultural trends.

Recto advocated for the nationalization of key industries and economic policies that prioritize national interests. He believed that political autonomy and national pride were essential for true independence and sovereignty. Recto's approach to economic and political sovereignty emphasizes the need for self-reliance and the protection of national resources. Nationalists should support policies that promote economic independence and political autonomy. By advocating for the nationalization of key industries and the protection of national resources, nationalists can help ensure that the benefits of economic growth are enjoyed by the nation as a whole.

Conclusion

The ideas of Renan, Anderson, and Recto provide valuable insights into the meanings and fundamental principles of nation and nationalism. Their perspectives highlight the importance of collective identity, the role of media and communication, and the need for political and economic independence. In contemporary times, these ideas remain relevant as nations navigate the complexities of globalization and strive to maintain their unique identities. Understanding the theoretical foundations of nationalism helps in addressing contemporary issues related to national identity, social cohesion, and sovereignty.

The principles articulated by Renan, Anderson, and Recto offer guidance for nationalists in formulating policies and strategies that promote unity, inclusivity, and self-reliance. Their ideas continue to inspire and inform nationalist movements around the world. As nations face new challenges in the 21st century, the insights of these thinkers can help in crafting responses that uphold the values of nationalism while embracing the realities of a globalized world. The future of nationalism will depend on the ability to balance the preservation of national identity with the demands of global interconnectness.

In conclusion, the exploration of Renan's emphasis on collective memory, Anderson's concept of imagined communities, and Recto's advocacy for political and economic sovereignty provides a comprehensive understanding of nationalism. These thinkers remind us that nationalism is not a static concept but a dynamic and evolving ideology that must adapt to changing circumstances. By drawing on their ideas, nationalists can develop a vision that is both rooted in tradition and responsive to contemporary challenges, ensuring that the nation remains a vital and cohesive entity in an increasingly interconnected world.

Based on these fundamental principles, the objectives of the Rizal Law emphasize the necessity of prioritizing education that cultivates a robust sense of national pride and a collective historical comprehension as a preliminary step in contemporary strategies for tackling political, economic, cultural, and social challenges. This involves enhancing students' understanding of the concepts, traditions, and issues that have shaped the nation's identity, along with educating them about significant historical occurrences and figures. To allow individuals to make significant contributions to the nation's ongoing progress, this education must promote critical thinking and informed participation regarding its history, current situation, and future. 

Governments could enhance media initiatives and educational programs to promote civic engagement and critical thinking about national identity, aligning with Renan's idea of a nation as a "daily plebiscite" of belonging. Besides motivating people to participate in writing their nation's history, these programs should aim to promote conversation and dialogue about the idea of nationhood. These initiatives can strengthen the ties that link people throughout the nation by fostering a sense of responsibility and ownership. This involves creating media initiatives and educational programs to promote civic engagement and critical reflection on national identity. 

From an economic standpoint, preserving cultural heritage and supporting local businesses could diminish dependence on foreign influences, mirroring Recto's aspiration for independence and national sovereignty. This policy emphasizes the significance of economic self-sufficiency in determining a nation's future and safeguarding its cultural heritage. Focusing on local production and consumption allows nations to maintain the cultural values and traditions that define their national identity, while also fostering economic prosperity for all citizens. Aligned with Recto's call for autonomy and self-reliance, governments ought to support domestic businesses and protect cultural artifacts to reduce dependence on external factors. 

Anderson's concept of "imagined communities" illustrates how cultural and social initiatives that maintain indigenous languages and traditions while adopting modern technologies can enhance community bonds. The depth of indigenous history can foster a more inclusive and unified national identity, and this policy recognizes cultural diversity as a source of strength. Efforts that respect indigenous languages and traditions through modern technologies, similar to Anderson's "imagined communities," could enhance social connections. Governments and individuals can work together to create inclusive policies and initiatives that address the nation's issues while ensuring that every part of society plays a role in fostering a brighter future by applying these ideas in practice and policy.

The ideas of Renan, Anderson, and Recto provide a strong foundation for addressing the Philippines’ political, economic, cultural, and social challenges.

Renan’s "daily plebiscite" stresses the importance of active citizen participation voting, holding leaders accountable, and fostering national unity. Anderson’s "imagined communities" highlight the role of media and education in shaping national consciousness, while Recto’s political sovereignty calls for policies that limit foreign influence and prioritize Filipino interests.

Economically, Renan’s collective will emphasizes the need for inclusive development, Anderson’s shared identity supports local industries and innovation, and Recto’s economic independence urges the protection of Filipino businesses from foreign exploitation. A nationalist approach would involve strengthening local industries, reducing dependence on foreign goods, and implementing sustainable economic policies.

Culturally, Renan’s shared heritage encourages the preservation of Filipino traditions, Anderson’s cultural symbols emphasize media’s role in reinforcing identity, and Recto’s cultural preservation pushes for stronger laws protecting heritage. A comprehensive nationalist solution includes promoting local art, language, and historical education to strengthen national pride.

By applying these principles, the Philippines can establish policies that ensure self reliance, cultural pride, and responsible governance laying the groundwork for a united and resilient nation.

As a man who wants to be the change I wish to see in the world, I believe that nationalism is not just a concept—it is a way of life. It is not about grand declarations or blind patriotism but about consistent action, responsibility, and sacrifice for the greater good. In the context of the Philippines, nationalism is crucial in addressing political instability, economic dependence, and cultural erosion. It is a call to action, a reminder that the fate of our country does not rest solely on the shoulders of its leaders but also on its people.

Renan’s idea of a “daily plebiscite” reinforces my belief that nationalism requires continuous effort. It is about making choices every day that contribute to the betterment of the nation—whether through voting wisely, engaging in civic discussions, or taking an active role in the community. The state of our country is not determined by one moment or one leader but by the collective decisions of its citizens. Recto’s call for economic self-reliance resonates with me deeply, especially in a nation where foreign influence often dictates economic policies. Supporting local industries, choosing Filipino-made products, and advocating for economic policies that prioritize national interests are ways in which I see myself contributing to this vision. Meanwhile, Anderson’s concept of an “imagined community” reminds me that being Filipino is more than just holding citizenship—it is about shared experiences, culture, and values. In a time when globalization is rapidly shaping identities, it is crucial to uphold our language, traditions, and national pride, ensuring that we do not lose sight of who we are.

But nationalism, for me, is more than just ideas and theories—it is something I actively live out. One of the ways I do this is through my participation in ROTC. Taking up ROTC is not just about fulfilling a requirement; it is a conscious decision to discipline myself, develop resilience, and prepare for responsibilities greater than my own personal ambitions. It is a challenge—physically, mentally, and emotionally—but one that I willingly embrace because I believe that a strong nation begins with individuals who are willing to serve. ROTC is not just about drills or commands; it instills in me values of leadership, accountability, and camaraderie—qualities that I know will shape me into a better citizen. It teaches me that being ready to serve my country does not always mean fighting wars but also being prepared to step up in times of crisis, whether it be through disaster response, community service, or simply setting an example of discipline and integrity.

Through ROTC, I see firsthand the kind of change I want to see in the Philippines. I want a nation that is not just critical of its flaws but actively works toward improvement. I want to see more Filipinos taking responsibility—not just waiting for the government to fix problems but being part of the solution. I want to foster a culture of discipline and civic duty, where service is seen as an honor rather than an obligation. A strong nation is not built overnight, nor is it built by a single leader; it is built through the collective efforts of its people. This is the kind of nationalism I choose to uphold—not just one of words or sentiments but of tangible actions, self-improvement, and a commitment to the greater good.

At the end of the day, nationalism is not about waving flags or singing anthems; it is about what we do when no one is watching. It is about making difficult choices, stepping up when needed, and dedicating ourselves to something bigger than personal gain. This is the nationalism I strive to live by, and this is the change I wish to see in my country.