#1 People v. Andrew Madison
New Columbia v. Chris Archer
Mock Trial Guide Short Version
Classroom Guide to Mock Trials Full Version
A mock trial argument is a persuasive speech delivered by a student attorney in a simulated courtroom setting, where they summarize the evidence presented during the trial and explain why the jury should rule in favor of their client, essentially making a compelling case based on the facts and legal points established during the trial, similar to a closing argument in a real courtroom.
Key points about mock trial arguments:
Structure:
Follows the format of a real closing argument, including a re-cap of key facts, analysis of witness testimony, and a clear articulation of why the presented evidence supports their side of the case.
Focus on evidence:
Attorneys must rely on the evidence presented during the trial (witness testimony, exhibits) to construct their argument, highlighting favorable points and downplaying any damaging information.
Persuasive language:
Effective arguments use strong rhetoric, logical reasoning, and emotional appeals to convince the mock jury.
Addressing opposing arguments:
Attorneys must anticipate and counter the opposing side's arguments, explaining why their interpretation of the evidence is more convincing.
Time constraints:
Mock trial arguments are typically limited to a specific time frame, requiring the attorney to be concise and prioritize key points.
This activity demonstrates the Nashville State Composition II Competencies of
Integrating sources appropriate to the thesis
Crafting logical arguments and addressing counterarguments
Using an academic voice
Explicating source materials while identifying rhetorical techniques
Incorporating sources as appropriate
**Grading Rubrics**
Mock Trial Performance Rubrics https://www.nsta.org/sites/default/files/journal-articles/supplemental-resources/table%206.pdf
Mock Trial Theory of the Case Rubric https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KCMEzbQjUKZKTa1iffwMmzVkaTTMWVKTD-xOPlwsmzw/edit?usp=sharing
Mock Trial Reflection Rubric https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hfOB1pLQae4R_ELi2TFMFHawgAjGu9TKHNA8hKbkKeg/edit?usp=sharing
Mock Trial Preparation in Class
Step 1: Decide what roles each witness will play.
Step 2: Read through the evidence and complete the worksheets for each role based on the information in the mock trial packet.
Step 3: Once the sheets have been completed, begin compiling a mutual "theory of the case" essay. This is the paper that you will file with the judge BEFORE the trial. Our judges must receive a copy of your case theory by class time on Monday 3/10/25. All lawyers and witnesses will work on the case file document together and will share the grade for the essay. Your paper will be graded using the NSCC rubric without documentation. You do not have to file this until 3/10, but you should have this finished before you begin practicing your case.
Step 4: A. Lawyers will practice opening, examining witnesses, cross-examining witnesses, and closing. The attorney who opens should not be the attorney who closes. There are two attorneys for a reason: decide what your strengths are as arguers and use them. Read all of the rules about presenting evidence and examining witnesses.
B. Witnesses should be able to answer all of the attorney's questions without notes. While they do not have to memorize their character script verbatim, they should be in character the entire time and answer all questions in the voice of that character. (see rubric)
Step 5: Trial Days. Students should dress appropriately for courtroom days. While students are not expected to wear suits and ties, clean and professional attire is expected. Jeans are allowed as long as they are free from holes. All shirts should be tucked in. No hats. No cell phones. The bailiff will confiscate cell phones during the trial.
Step 6: After each class period, each team should meet to debrief and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of their performance. No alternations may be made to the witness list; however, new evidence may be discovered as long as it is shared with both teams prior to trial.
Step 7: The team that is not performing will serve as the jury and the jury will decide the case based on the evidence presented in performance. The judge will rule on fallacies in logic.
Step 8: Once both cases have been tried, the class will engage in a debrief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
" You must decide what evidence and arguments to ignore as well as which ones to emphasize. Your final product should be a cohesive, logical view of the merits of the case that is consistent with common everyday experience, that builds on your strengths and finds ways to compensate for your weaknesses"
Writing a Case Theory https://law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b584/CaseTheory.pdf
How to Write Opening and Closing Statements for Mock Trial https://rivercity.wusd.k12.ca.us/documents/Students/Mock-Trial/Opening%20and%20Closing%20Statements.pdf
Steps in a Mock Trial
https://lawforkids.org/programs/mock-trial/tournament-documents/76-steps-in-a-mocktrial/file
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mock Trial Preparation Resources:
Mock Trial Script https://2ndcircuit.leoncountyfl.gov/teenCourt/resources/MockTrialAttorneyandBailiffScript.pdf
Street Law https://streetlaw.org/teaching-resources/simulations-mock-trials-and-moot-courts/
Mock Trial Strategies https://www.mocktrialstrategies.com/resources-2/
University of Florida Mock Trial Guide https://guides.lib.usf.edu/c.php?g=638162&p=4523763
The Role of the Attorney Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cnp9l9bkoUk
Understanding Direct Examination Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXRL41uilfc
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Complete the following handouts as preparation for your "Theory of the Case." These must be turned in to the instructor along with a copy of the "Theory of the Case" that you will submit to the judges pre-trial. You may only have legal pads and evidence in the courtroom on trial days.
For Witnesses
Getting into Character Prep Sheet: file:///C:/Users/CJoyce/Downloads/Witness%20Profile%20(1).pdf
For Defense Attorneys
Theory of the Case Prep Sheet: file:///C:/Users/CJoyce/Downloads/Defendant&%23039%3Bs%20Theory%20of%20Case.pdf
Opening Statement Prep Sheet: file:///C:/Users/CJoyce/Downloads/Opening%20Statements%20(1).pdf
Examining Witnesses Prep Sheet: file:///C:/Users/CJoyce/Downloads/Direct%20Exam%20Worksheet.pdf
For Prosecution Attorneys
Plantiffs' Theory of the Case Prep Sheet: file:///C:/Users/CJoyce/Downloads/Plaintiff%20Prosecution%20Theory%20of%20Case%20(1).pdf
Opening Statement Prep Sheet: file:///C:/Users/CJoyce/Downloads/Opening%20Statements%20(1).pdf
Examining Witnesses Prep Sheet file:///C:/Users/CJoyce/Downloads/Direct%20Exam%20Worksheet.pdf
Logic In Writing
"Logic in Writing"
"How to Write a Good Argumentative Essay" https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/logic_in_argumentative_writing/logic_in_writing.html
"Argumentative Writing and Using Evidence"
https://www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter/docs/handouts/Argumentative%20Writing%20and%20Using%20Evidence.pdf
Logical Fallacies & the Law
"Unmasking Logical Fallacies" https://tennesseelawreview.org/blogpostunmaskinglogicalfallacies/#:~:text=Fallacies%20can%20undermine%20arguments%2C%20hinder,using%20them%20in%20their%20own.
"The Signicance of Logic and the Law" https://www.judges.org/news-and-info/the-significance-of-logic-for-law/
"The Most Common Logical Fallacies Found on the LSAT" https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/blog/the-complete-guide-to-the-most-common-logical-fallacies-found-on-the-lsat/
"Seven Logical Fallacies Lawyers Need to Stop Using" https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/greedy-associates/7-logical-fallacies-lawyers-need-to-stop-using/
"Logic for Lawyers: A Cheat Sheet" https://www.americanbar.org/groups/government_public/resources/logic_for_lawyers/