Abstract Submission Format

Abstract Submission Guidelines

Welcome to the abstract submission hub for our upcoming conference on "Enhancing Academic Integrity: From ideas to action." We are excited to hear about your experiences, research, and practical solutions that address contemporary challenges in academic integrity. Please carefully review the following guidelines before submitting your abstract.

CCT Enhancing Academic Integrity 2024- Abstract Submission Form

Submission Process

• Review Conference Themes and Values: Ensure your submission aligns with at least one of the conference themes and incorporates the conference values.

• Draft Your Abstract: Prepare a 250-word abstract outlining your case study, project, initiative, or research. Highlight the practical implications and how academic integrity is fostered.

• Submission Form: Complete all required fields in the submission form. You can save and resume your submission, but once you click "Submit," you will not be able to edit your submission.

• Submission deadline: The deadline for submission of abstracts for consideration at this conference is 28th June 12th July.

• Feedback: Feedback on abstracts and whether they have been accepted for the conference will be provided in late July.

Conference purpose, audience, themes and values can be reviewed on the conference website homepage.

Screening Criteria for Abstracts

• Alignment with Conference Themes: Abstracts should align with one of the conference themes.

• Interest to the Target Audience: Abstracts should present topics of interest to conference delegates and should be relevant to current challenges and innovations in the field of academic integrity.

• Alignment to Conference Values: Abstracts should be in alignment with conference values.

• Actionable Insights: Abstract should provide practical insights, strategies, or solutions that delegates can apply in their own work.

Peer Review Scoring and Feedback Process

• Reviewer Scores: Peer reviewers will assign a quantitative score based on the criteria above.

• Qualitative Feedback: Reviewers will provide qualitative feedback for all submissions.

• Scoring System Adjustment: The scoring system may be adjusted based on the overall volume and quality of submissions to ensure fairness and rigor.

These criteria and scoring process aim to ensure that the abstracts selected for the conference are high-quality, relevant, and valuable to attendees, fostering a meaningful and impactful event.