The files below are locked for EE supervisor access only:
Fresh focus on the growth of the learner through their EE experience, emphasising skills development and transfer
One 500-word reflective statement, (no long 3 individual ones) captured on a redesigned Research and progress form (RPF), which also continues to record the attendance of the student at three, mandatory reflection sessions, the third being a viva voce.
Continues to be submitted with the EE, and is assessed applying a redesigned Criterion E
The legacy criteria have been amended and restructured, with a new total maximum possible mark of 30:
Criterion A – Framework for the essay (research question, research methods, structure) (6 mks)
Criterion B – Knowledge and understanding (6 mks)
Criterion C – Analysis and line of argument (6 mks)
Criterion D– Discussion and evaluation (8 mks)
Criterion E – Reflection (growth, evaluate) (4 mks)
Old Criterion C (critical thinking) has been divided into 2 separate criteria (C and D).
Old Criterion D (presentation) has been removed, but the ‘structure’ element has been retained as an element of a reworked Criterion A.
Old Criterion E now has a fresh focus on the growth of the learner through their EE experience, emphasising skills development and transfer.
The wording of markband descriptors is now clearer and more concise.
New Assessment Criteria Rubrics and Grade Descriptors
(2027 Assessment)
Note: Examiners are instructed no to read or assess any material in excess of the word limit.
Guidance on what content should be included in the word count:
The introduction
The main body
The conclusion
Quotations
Footnotes and/or endnotes that are not references
Table of Contents
Maps, charts, diagrams, annotated illustrations
Tables
Equations, formulas, and calcuations
Citations/refernecs (whether parenthetical, numbered, footnotes, or endnotes)
The bibliography
Headers
Comments can be added that indicate how the essay could be improved. The comments should be open-ended and not involve editing the text.
Supervisors are not permitted to:
correct spelling and punctuation
correct experimental work or mathematics
re-write any part of the essay
indicate where whole sections of the essay would be better placed
proofread the essay for errors
correct bibliographies or citations.
A supervisor should not feel burdened by a responsibility to provide subject area expertise in terms of directing students to content that they can use in their essay.
The EE is a student-focused, self-regulated learning experience, with the student firmly at the centre of the research and writing process.
An EE Supervisor should think of themselves as a guide and mentor rather than a shaper of the student’s work.
A supervisor’s skill set is focused more on supporting the student with the process and prompting thinking and action by the student with well-placed questions ("Extended Essay Guide").
See the Supervising and Interdisciplinary EE Document above for more guidance.
When accessing sources, students should:
always start by having a clear and focused research question, so that they are not overwhelmed by their research
identify appropriate databases or search engines specific to the topics they are exploring
have a basic understanding of prompt engineering when using generative AI, but then critically evaluate the reliability and validity of the information obtained
not rely on content generated by AI tools, nor on unvetted or unattributed sources found on the internet
keep a detailed lists of prompts used in querying AI tools to generate content
keep a detailed record of all sources consulted, in accordance with the IB’s requirements on citation and referencing.
For example, they should ensure that the URL of an internet source is recorded fully along with the date the site was accessed. The researcher’s reflection space is a good tool for supporting this practice.
During the preparation and planning phase, students can use internet search engines or generative AI tools to identify ethical issues related to their career interest.
They can refine their search to further explore those ethical issues and generate a list of ethical dilemmas.
Students can then seek information on various contexts and perspectives relevant to the ethical dilemma they choose.
This can be especially helpful for students who struggle to get going. However, it is only a starting point—students must use critical thinking to filter through the information provided and evaluate their sources for reliability and bias.
They must also think critically in refining their research questions, and use additional vetted sources to conduct, analyse and synthesize research.
If students find that a potentially useful but lengthy text resource does not have its own summary abstract, they could use AI tools to summarize the resource for them.
This will allow them to determine quickly whether it contains information relevant to their research. Once it is determined that a resource is worth further investigation, students must then explore it more thoroughly.
For students conducting primary research, AI tools can support data analysis, especially if students are using large data sets.
Data analysis tools with visualization options can create data charts and graphs. These can enhance student presentations or projects where data visualization is important to communicating key information in the student’s essay.
Writing assistants are built into most word-processing programs and are commonly used to provide immediate feedback on grammar, punctuation, structure and word choice. Generative AI can augment writing assistance further, supporting students in exploring and adhering to stylistic conventions. These could be valuable tools for students who want to consider different options when refining their writing.
However, students must not use generative AI to write any part of their extended essays.
A good strategy to consider is requiring students to record prompt histories when using generative AI tools.
This can help teachers to confirm the authenticity of student work and can help students learn how to make better use of AI tools.
For any IB student work where an external source has been used, including information sourced or generated through AI tools, a citation must be included at the point of use which should link to a full reference in the bibliography.
Students should be clear that if they use content produced by an AI tool—by copying or paraphrasing text or modifying an image—they must clearly reference it in the body of their work and add the reference in their reference list or bibliography.