Embedded Files
Water management runs on knowledge — hydrological models, data series, flood projections, scenario analyses. Without this technical apparatus, large-scale water management is not possible. The patterns in this cluster are not a case against it. They are a case for knowing what it can and cannot do.
Models answer the questions they are built to answer. They reflect the assumptions of the people who built them and are silent about everything outside their boundary conditions. The discipline of good modelling is knowing where that boundary is and resisting the temptation to speak beyond it. That discipline is harder than it sounds. The professional incentives of water management reward complexity and confidence. The simplest model that generates a useful result is rarely the one that wins the budget.
Meanwhile, the knowledge that communities have accumulated over generations — about how a river behaves, where the water goes, which fields survive a dry year — is structurally invisible to the technical apparatus. It gets dismissed as insufficiently rigorous, lost as interventions replace the conditions that sustained it, and rediscovered elsewhere at considerable cost.
The patterns in this cluster describe these failure modes: the reinvention of local knowledge, the missequencing of expertise and experience, the inflation of models beyond their honest limits, and the brittleness that comes from planning around a single future. Together they point toward a more disciplined and more humble relationship between technical knowledge and the systems it is trying to understand.
The Loop of Reinvented Knowledge — Local knowledge accumulated over generations is dismissed as insufficiently modern, lost as the intervention replaces the conditions that sustained it, and then rediscovered elsewhere as innovation at enormous cost.
Science Waits Its Turn — Models and data are ready to join the conversation but do not speak first. The sequencing of expertise and experience determines whether technical knowledge illuminates or distorts.
No Fat Modelling — The simplest model that generates a useful result is more honest than the most complete one. Complexity absorbs uncertainty rather than revealing it, and buries the assumptions that most need to be examined.
The Single Future Pitfall — When a plan is optimised for one future, it performs well under that future and fails under all the others. The design case gradually stops being a guess about what is coming and becomes a substitute for it.
When the River Disagrees — A water manager has three sources of understanding: the real world, their intuition, and their model. Professional culture ranks them in exactly the wrong order. When the river contradicts the model, it is the river that gets explained away. But the river is always right — and the divergence is the finding, not the error.
The Hungry Model — A water management challenge arrives and the first response is to reach for data and models. The modelling expands, as it always does, until eighty or ninety percent of the budget and timeline is gone. The recommendations, interventions, and governance design that were the actual purpose of the project are written in the margins of what remains. The model's completion is reported as an achievement. The questions it was built to answer remain open.
The Electronics Delusion — Hydrology is routinely practised as if it were a closed system of known components governed by exact laws — the mental model imported from electronics, where that confidence is earned. The result is a profession simultaneously overconfident in its models and underconfident in its judgment, that mistakes the precision of its outputs for the accuracy of its understanding.
The Model as Monopoly — When a model becomes the exclusive container of institutional knowledge, it stops being a tool that experts use to think and becomes the thing that defines who counts as an expert. The model creates its own priesthood — you are either inside the temple or you are not qualified to speak — producing a technocracy that is beyond democratic accountability and hostile to any healthy competition of ideas.
It Only Counts If It Can Be Counted (waiting)
Page updated
Report abuse