“The arts” is used in TOK to include a diverse range of disciplines such as visual arts, theatre, dance, music, film and literature. The forms and methods of these disciplines are often dissimilar, so the diversity within this single area of knowledge can itself be an excellent stimulus for TOK discussions.
The arts provide rich material for discussions of concepts such as
how we ascribe meaning to works of art, or whether the intention of the artist is what determines meaning
the role of the audience in the arts, such as the emotional character of art or the role of critics in determining the quality of an artwork
the social character and function of the arts
whether there are, or should be, limits to what is acceptable in art
the relationship between arts and particular cultures or traditions
artwork
artist
aesthetic
value
beauty
creativity
imagination
judgement
Cultural gatekeeper
convention
genre
affordance
subjectivity
Do the disciplines in the arts diverge from one another more fundamentally than disciplines within other areas of knowledge?
Does new knowledge in the arts always build on what is already known?
How have new technologies changed the nature and scope of the arts as an area of knowledge?
Are the arts best seen as a system of knowledge, a type of knowledge or a means of expressing knowledge?
Is artistic knowledge something that cannot be expressed in any other way?
Is the relationship between “knowing how” and “knowing that” different in the arts compared to other areas of knowledge? Does art enlarge what it is possible for us to think and know?
Is there such a thing as “obsolete” knowledge in the arts?
Can a work of art have meaning of which the artist themselves is unaware?
How does knowing more about the social, cultural or historical context of a work of art have an impact on our knowledge of the work itself?
Can art change the way we interpret the world?
What are the justifications for, and implications of, claiming that there are absolute standards for “good art”?
Who determines what art is valued, and on what criteria?
Should your judgments about art be given the same weight as those of an expert?
What role does the history of an artform play in evaluating present work?
Does convention play a different role in the arts compared to other areas of knowledge?
Does sense perception perform a radically different role in the arts compared to other areas of knowledge?
If the language of an art form is non-verbal, does this free it from being limited to propositional knowledge?
Can some knowledge in the arts only be gained through experience? How does the medium used change the way that knowledge is produced, shared or understood?
To what extent are the methods of justification different in the arts compared to other areas of knowledge?
In what ways are moral judgments similar to, or different from, aesthetic judgments?
Do the arts play a role in the development of our personal value systems?
How important is the study of literature in our individual ethical development?
Is the production and enjoyment of art subject to ethical constraints?
On what criteria could it be decided if the state has the right to censor art that is deemed immoral or blasphemous?
Do the arts have the power to challenge established moral values?
Are moral and aesthetic judgments more a matter of taste than a matter of truth?
Can we separate the moral character of the artist from the value of the artwork?
Does art provide knowledge of the artist or of ourselves? (scope)
How is art used in advertising to affect the beliefs of individuals and groups? (perspectives)
Does artistic creation rely more heavily on imagination than on other cognitive tools? (methods and tools)
What moral responsibilities do we have regarding art that has been created or published by other people? (ethics)
Coming Soon!