This week will explore how to design research projects that address health disparities. Faculty will learn to identify research questions and methodologies that prioritize inclusion and social justice, while also considering the ethical dimensions of working with marginalized populations. Participants will reflect on their current or future research and consider how they can embed inclusive principles into their scholarly practices.
Supplemental materials will include research guides, examples of inclusive research studies, and ethical frameworks to support responsible and impactful research.
Key Readings and Critical Perspectives
1. "Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR): Towards Equitable Involvement of Community in Psychology Research"
(Collins et al., 2018, American Psychologist)
Inclusive Framework – CBPR centers the knowledge, needs, and priorities of communities in the research process, promoting co-learning and mutual benefit.
Cultural Humility & Identity – Emphasizes reflexivity and cultural humility as key to dismantling power imbalances in researcher–community relationships.
Ethical & Practical Collaboration – Encourages shared decision-making, long-term trust-building, and co-ownership of the research process and its outcomes.
Capacity Building – Aims to enhance both scientific knowledge and local community strengths through inclusive partnerships.
Implication for Teaching – Faculty can model CBPR by embedding community engagement in research design, ethics discussions, and course assignments.
2. "Decolonial Framework for Reflexivity and Positionality in Global Health Research"
(Naidu, Gingell, & Zaidi, 2024, Global Health Promotion)
Context and Accountability – Calls for reflexivity in both global and local research contexts, with priority on accountability to communities rather than only to funders or institutions.
Identity and Positionality – Encourages researchers to interrogate their own identities, power, and worldview to avoid reinforcing colonial hierarchies in research settings.
Procedural vs. Practical Ethics – Critiques how traditional IRBs may uphold colonial standards of ethics; urges alignment with local, community-defined ethical norms.
Disrupting Epistemic Dominance – Argues for dismantling Euro-American research assumptions by supporting diverse, situated knowledges and community epistemologies.
Implication for Teaching – Promotes incorporating positionality, decolonial ethics, and reflexive methods into student research training and academic mentorship.
📌 Feedback
Please fill out the feedback form here to mark your progress for this week.
Additional Resources
(Venkateswaran et al., 2023, RTI Press)
Researcher Transformation – Encourages critical self-reflection on identity, power, and bias; equity work starts with the individual researcher.
Equity in Research Design – Promotes studies that address root causes of inequity, not just outcomes, and align with community-defined priorities.
Inclusive Research Practices – Advocates for culturally responsive methods and community-led research processes.
Epistemic Power – Challenges dominant (Western) knowledge systems and uplifts marginalized voices and knowledge traditions.
Funding and Infrastructure – Calls for more inclusive research funding structures and long-term community investment.
Implication for Teaching – Faculty should model reflexivity and justice-centered methods while mentoring students in ethical, collaborative research.