*Updated 2024*
Click on the tabs to see access to Popover windows showing the original DOCUMENTS and IMAGES.
DOCUMENTS TAB
IMAGES TAB
The SOURCE NOTES and BLACK VOICES tabs are experimental open container fields.
This means they only include text (which means there is almost no storage burden). I created them for experimental purposes to figure out how I could anchor qualitative data to stronger quantitatively recognizable social science markers. The aim was to paste unformatted, searchable text never intended to become "camera-ready" for someone to read like humans read books or websites. The animating idea for inclusion was that the researcher leaves open the possibility for further detection of patterns. Even at the end of a study, researchers can miss associations hidden by assumed familiarity or presumed absence. But repetition, time, or robots might reveal links from research notes.
Currently, only a minority of Camp Profile entries have corresponding Source Notes and/or Black Voices entries. Yet I argue that keeping them in this version of the project's online beta version suggests advantages in presenting in-process work more publicly. Potential advantages include:
more tag creation in the voice of Black speakers (TAGS: SHOES, HANTS)
potential public discussion over dialect standardization in the process of digitization (SEE NOTE IN RED)
stronger centering of specific Black actors in historically-anchored dates and times on Emancipation timeline
SOURCE NOTES TAB
BLACK VOICES TAB
A relational database joins different tables into meaningful relationships with each other.
⬆️The Camps Record Detail Layout screenshotted above with 287 entries is one of multiple layouts. Each layout organizes the database into different orientations, making--in effect--different databases sourced from the same data. The advantage of a relational database is that it permits the creator to collect diverse sources into entries profiling camp records while at the same time ensuring that this systematization is not the only way to look at the data. Subsequently, as one field of data or pattern appears more significant for study, users can create yet another layout that does not creat new information but reorganizes what is already there. (For example, a user could make an ISLANDS layout that foregrounds how the refugee camps that are islands--perhaps as a means to correlate environmental history data or gender demographics.) All database layouts are browsable and searchable unto themselves.
🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹
⬅️
To the left we see the Document Database Layout with 765 entries that gives researchers better tools to understand and interrogate the kinds of documents that recorded Black refugee camp experiences of freedpeople.
🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹
➡️
To the right we see the Images Database Layout with 372 entries that gives researchers an opportunity to browse and search an array of images and illustrations attached to camps that can also be informative for different sets of research questions beyond the freedpeople's refugee camps contexts.
I created other layouts in order to see specific selected data in a more focused way.
WHAT MAKES A DATABASE RELATIONAL: INFORMATION IS RELATED TO EACH OTHER, BUT YOU CAN CHANGE HOW YOU VIEW THAT INFORMATION BY CREATING DIFFERENT LAYOUTS AND REORGANIZING THAT INFORMATION BY ID
Relational database
A group of one or more databases. Each occurrence of data is stored in only one table at a time, but can be accessed in any table, either in the same file or from a related file. Data from another table or file is displayed in the current table without being copied, and the data changes whenever the values in the other table or file change.
Relationship
Relationships provide access to data from one table to another. Relationships can join one record in one table to one record in another table, one record to many other records, or all records in one table to all records in another table, depending on the criteria you specify when you create the relationship in the relationships graph.
Relationships graph
In the Relationships tab of the Manage Database dialog box, you can see the occurrences of tables both in the current file and from any external, related files. In this relationships graph, you join tables and change relationships between fields in different tables.
When you create a new table, a visual representation, or occurrence, of the table appears in the relationships graph. You can specify multiple occurrences (with unique names) of the same table in order to work with complex relationships in the graph.
Interactive Map
*Updated 2024*
This a work-in-progress database and mapping project that documents Black Freedpeople's camps (many known as "contraband camps") of Emancipation. I invite viewers to reenvision the narrative of emancipation by connecting with a reconstructed archive in database form. Here we can center Black historical actions and voices spread across many harder-to-find archival sources. By employing new and emergent technologies, we can better collect, systematize, and reinterpret Black actions and voices that had previously been marginalized in the traditional Civil War archives. This web-published version represents my attempts to date, with the help of student research assistants.
I am not yet satisfied that this draft does justice to the richness I know from my time spent with Black sources, or to the work coming out from scholars and grassroots archival justice initiatives. I still see the potential for more geocoding of qualitative interview data. I see the potential for an open-source database project to be a means of encouraging Black communities today to see their own ancestors' first freedom family histories as part of a rolling archive still in need of participation and preservation. I see the potential for genealogists and heirs' property justice advocates to find common cause in the collecting and sharing of Emancipation sources and resources.
When communities today talk about the work of repair, it can quite amicably be a conversation of common investment. Black people were the reason a young nation at war with itself was able to repair and sustain. The histories we tell about who we were and are matter. Only through understanding how a people enslaved under American law could turn around and make America whole can we embrace the reality that there is no America without Black America.
I revive and update histories on Black culture from the 1970s and 80s (Sterling Stuckey, Robert Farris Thompson, Leon Litwack, and Lawrence Levine) and put them into conversation with recent work situating African diasporic folk culture as the intellectual history of the Atlantic World (Jason Young, Aisha Finch, James Sweet, Grey Gundaker).[1]
I integrate new archaeologies and anthropologies of culture to show how African Americans developed social controls and collectivities among each other outside of their legal integration into the body politic.[2]
The most persuasive and enduring paradigm for American self-emancipation remains Black military service and W.E.B. DuBois’ assertion that enslaved people conducted a “general strike” in leaving plantations for Union camps.[3]
I speak to an audience in African American and diasporic studies concerned with the unfinished work of Atlantic World emancipation as well as to American history audiences concerned with Civil War and Reconstruction in national reckonings.
[1] Stuckey, Slave Culture; Thompson, Flash of the Spirit; Levine, Black Culture Black Consciousness; Litwack, Been in the Storm So Long; James Sweet, Domingo Alvares; Ada Ferrer, Freedom’s Mirror; Pablo Gomez, Experiential Caribbean; Jason Young, Rituals of Resistance, Kiatezua Lubanzadio Luyaluka, "The Spiral as the Basic Semiotic of the Kongo Religion, the Bukongo: Journal of Black Studies 2017 Vol. 48(1) 91-112.
[2] In anthropology, I use the work of Grey Gundaker, Jean and John Comaroff, and David Chidester.. In archaeology, I use digs performed in Virginia, South Carolina, Georgia, New Orleans, Texas, and Kentucky.
[3] W.E.B. DuBois, Black Reconstruction in America, 1860– 1880 (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co., 1935), Chapter 4.
"LORD, UNTIL I REACH MY HOME": INSIDE THE REFUGEE CAMPS OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR by Abigail Cooper
This study explores the inner life of the refugee camps of the Civil War. Called “contraband” camps because the refugees were considered the confiscated slave property of Confederates, the camps were the first great cultural meeting grounds the war produced. This work gives close study to the refugee camps over the course of the Civil War period, comparing the experiences across the South with a special focus on the religious transformations that occurred there. It analyzes sources through a process of triangulation—examining slave interviews and narratives, missionary texts, government military records, and fragmentary evidence collected from various regional archives—in order to uncover the practices and artifacts outside of institutionally understood religious rubrics in the study of history. First, this study elucidates the cross-cultural encounter that took place in the camps not only as an interracial experiment between white and black but also as an exchange between black slaves of different cultural backgrounds. Second, this dissertation shows that the camps were breeding grounds for religious revival. Here was a meeting not of slave religion but of slave religions, and the syncretic forms and clashes that resulted are not yet described nor understood. Finally, this study promises to challenge histories of emancipation that celebrate black military service as the sole source of contraband freedom and citizenship. Rather than creating a solution for the contrabands, the advent of Union black military recruiting was a trauma, upsetting family reunions and making claims to land and subsistence more tenuous. This study evaluates the cost of military service and the alternative scenarios refugees themselves proposed.
Interactive Map
"Lord, Until I Reach My Home": Inside the Refugee Camps of the American Civil War
https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_digital/1/
If history has drawn the battle maps and borders of occupied territories over time in abundance, it is time to add the markers of the refugee camps often seen as peripheral to our history of the war. It is time to follow Black migration patterns and pathways as a means to better understand not just the many acts of fleeing from slavery but of walking toward something—a place where an entirely new system of order was possible. In this space of possibility, revolution could take root.
This digital mapping project accompanies my dissertation. The supplement included in the appendix and online includes full tables and maps, including pop-up annotations. The intention here is to give a lay of land for reader’s orientation to the "contraband camps" as well as to emphasize contingency and geographical specificity. These maps reconceptualize center and periphery in current Civil War history. They posit refugee camps as the centers of cultural production. They further highlight environmental features of strategic import—woods, swamps, rivers, and islands—as a means of conceiving the perspective of the refugee experience on the ground.