2024
Adamo, S. H., Brem, R., & Mitroff, S. R. (2024). Comparing multiple-target search performance and the satisfaction of search effect between 2D and segmented-3D search. Proceedings of SPIE - Medical Imaging 2024: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 12929, 1292909. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3005601 (.pdf)
2023
Adamo, S. H., Roque, N, Barufaldi, B., Schmidt, J., Mello-Thoms, C., & Lago, M. (2023). Assessing satisfaction of search in virtual mammograms for experienced and novice searchers. Journal of Medical Imaging, 10(S11917), 1-13. (.pdf)
2021
Adamo, S. H., Gereke, B. J., Shomstein, S., & Schmidt, J., (2021). From “satisfaction of search” to “subsequent search misses”: a review of multiple‑target search errors across radiology and cognitive science. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(59), 1-19. (.pdf)
2020
Porfido, C. L., Cox, P. H., Adamo, S. H., & Mitroff, S. R. (2020). Recruiting from the shallow end of the pool: Differences in cognitive and compliance measures for subject pool participants based on enrollment time across an academic term. Visual Cognition, 28(1), 1-9. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1702602. (.pdf)
2019
Adamo, S.H., Cox, P.H., Kravitz, D.J. et al. How to correctly put the “subsequent” in subsequent search miss errors. Atten Percept Psychophys 81, 2648–2657 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01802-8 (.pdf)
2018
Adamo, S. H., Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2018). Satisfaction at last: Evidence for the “satisfaction” account for multiple-target search errors. Proceedings SPIE: Medical Imaging, Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment. 105770A, doi.org/10.1117/12.2293692. (.pdf)
Adamo, S. H., Ericson, J. M., Nah, J. C., Brem, R., & Mitroff, S. R. (2018). Mammography to tomosynthesis: Examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(17), 1-13. (.pdf)
2017
Adamo, S. H., Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2017). An individual differences approach to multiple-target visual search errors: How search errors relate to different characteristics of attention. Vision Research. (.pdf)
2015
Adamo, S. H., Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2015). Targets need their own Personal space: Effects of clutter on multiple-target visual search. Perception, 44(10), 1203-1214. (.pdf)
Biggs, A. T., Adamo, S. H., & Mitroff, S. R. (2015). Mo’ money, mo’ problems: Monetary motivation can exacerbate the attentional blink. Perception, 44(4), 410-422. (.pdf)
Biggs, A. T., Adamo, S. H., Dowd, E. W., & Mitroff, S. R. (2015). Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 844-855. (.pdf)
Mitroff, S. R., Biggs, A. T., Adamo, S. H., Dowd, E. W., Winkle, J., & Clark, K. (2015). What can 1 billion trials tell us about visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 41(1), 1-5. (.pdf)
2014
Biggs, A. T., Adamo, S. H., & Mitroff, S. R. (2014). Rare, but obviously there: Effects of target frequency and salience on visual search accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 152, 158-165. (.pdf)
2013
Adamo, S. H., Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Self-induced attentional blink: A cause of errors in multiple-target visual search. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2569-2574. (.pdf)