Building Evidence-Based Literacy Practices In And Out of School
By Nichole Goodmann
The act of reading is complex and multifaceted. According to the National Reading Panel (2000) there are five components that make up the act of reading- phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, fluency and reading comprehension. Amidst these five pillars there exists a delicate relationship that comprises reading instruction and that we are now discussing as being “the science of reading.” This relationship is known as The Simple View of Reading (Gough & Tunmer, 1986) and is a straightforward way of understanding the complexity of reading. Reading comprehension is the product of word recognition AND language comprehension, meaning that it cannot exist if one of the two parts is absent or deficient.
Word recognition includes skills that build upon phonemic awareness and phonics to eventually arrive at the point where students are able to fluently decode and recognize words. These are the skills we heavily target in early literacy development. In fact, development in phonemic awareness (the ability to identify, isolate and manipulate speech sounds) is shown to have a direct impact on later reading and spelling skills (Masterson and Apel, 2000). This is why we want young children to sing songs and practice rhyming games. We are training their ears to understand the sounds of English so they will be ready to make the connection to sound-symbols (letters) when they begin encountering phonics instruction.
School Practice: In our classroom this year, we will be using an evidence-based curriculum called Heggerty (2003) to support phonemic awareness skill development. This is a quick lesson every day first thing in the morning to get students ready for later phonics instruction. As a group students listen for the initial, medial and final sounds in words, blend and segment sounds, and even substitute sounds in words (the most difficult of the sound tasks). For example, I may have students say “beep” then change /b/ to /sh/ and tell me the new word.
Home Practice: A familiar game such as I Spy could be easily adapted to build phonemic awareness skills and played anywhere! Next time you head to the grocery store try playing “I Spy something that starts with the sound...”
Phonics instruction is the explicit pairing of speech sounds to sound-symbols, or letters. This is usually the component of literacy most people associate with “learning to read” as it is the foundational step of learning the alphabetic code. In second grade we strive to ensure students are able to fluently decode all 6 Syllable types, which students were introduced to in first grade, but may still need practice in acquiring proficiency with. For your reference, the 6 Syllable Types are:
Closed Syllables (cat, bin, run, pot)
Open Syllables (he, she, hi, fly)
Vowel-Consonant-E Syllables (home, kite, mule, stone)
R-Controlled Vowel Syllables (fur, girl, horn, car)
Vowel Team Syllables (boy, soup, play, foot)
Consonant-LE Syllables (humble, boggle, thimble, puzzle)
School Practice: We use Fundations (2002) for phonics instruction. It is a well-researched program that teaches phonics explicitly and systematically (this type of phonics instruction is known as synthetic phonics). Students will spend a significant portion of whole group instruction working with these syllable patterns both for reading and spelling purposes and will then be able to start reading multisyllabic words that contain a variety of syllable patters (rainbow, racetrack, toothpaste).
Home Practice: This is where the real “homework” is! Students should be decoding (sounding out and or fluently reading) as much as possible at home and there is text all around us! Encouraging students to read ads, text messages, recipes, labels, really anything they can get their hands on will be beneficial. They may not have mastered the “code” yet enough to read everything that is out there, but practicing and observing the practical applications of literacy in daily life will support their literacy skills tremendously.
Another important component of word recognition involves fluency in reading words that do not seem to follow the logic of English (believe it or not, there is logic behind our language!). In our class, we call these words “heart words.” This is because there is a part of the word that they cannot simply sound out. They have to memorize these heart parts/words so they can read and spell them correctly.
School Practice: Every week students will have heart words to practice as a group (some of these they will already have mastered) as well as in a small group (these will be tailored to them individually based on a high frequency word assessment I have given each student based on Fry’s 200 most frequently used words). In class we will look at the word, for example “is” and analyze what parts follow the rules by putting a check mark above, for example, the “i” because it makes the /i/ sound as expected. However, a heart will go above or around the parts that do not follow the rules, such as how the “s” in this word say /z/ rather than /s/ (even though it can make the /z/ sound as well, but in that case is most often found between two vowels such as in the word “nose” and “rose”).
Home Practice: This is where frequently writing out heart words in fun ways at home can be beneficial as repeated practice aids in the long-term storage of information. Some research has shown that using a variety of methods can help the group of neurons in the brain that filters information, known as the Reticular Activating System (RAS), to focus into the content that is being delivered (Bell, 2017). For example, students could write there words in chalk, with a dry erase marker on a window or mirror, in a sandbox with a chopstick or simply in the air with their arm.
Readers not only need to learn to “break the code” fluently, but they also need to understand that meaning of the code they break. Language comprehension is, therefore, the other key component of the reading equation. Vocabulary development is an essential part of understanding language. One of the best ways to develop a child’s vocabulary is to expose them to reading daily by either reading to them or with them. According to a well-known study (Nagy & Herman, 1987), children who are exposed to reading for 20 minutes per day develop significantly larger vocabularies than those who read for less, which has far-reaching implications not only on the child’s academic success, but on their career and overall life-satisfaction. There are many other benefits to reading daily (perhaps too many to note here, but I have provided links to various sources below for more information), but another aspect of language comprehension is the ability to understand complex grammatical structures. Exposure to a variety of texts can support this. Finally, students need to encounter a vast range of ideas and information. It has been said that to learn something you must know something, and this is true! This is yet another reason why “building background knowledge” is so important.
Perry Lecompton School District, Perry KS. (n.d.)
School Practice: The English Language Arts (ELA) program currently used by our district is called Benchmark Advance & Adelante (2015). The program is made up of 10 units of study with embedded themes of social studies, science, and literature. In class, we will spend time daily engaging in reading comprehension activities such as retelling, researching, role-playing and writing to deepen support student comprehension of the weekly/daily text while at the same time expanding vocabulary and background knowledge. Additionally, I read aloud to students daily from a variety of books to facilitate inferential thinking skills so students can practice understanding text beyond the surface code (Kelly & Moses, 2018).
Home Practice: Reading is a practice that starts with modeling. Consider what message it sends to children if they are told they must read for 20 minutes while their parents or guardians scroll through their social media accounts or are streaming their favorite Netflix special. I am not in any way suggesting these other activities are bad. In fact, they play an important part in a different mode of learning (digital literacy), but what I would ask is for you to simply consider, do you feel you promote a culture of literacy at home? How can you increase that practice for yourself if you feel it is weak? How can you maintain that practice if it is already established?
I believe the ability to read is a right all children have and I trust that together we can make your child's second-grade literacy journey a success!
Learn more at:
https://www.understood.org/en/articles/14-ways-to-encourage-your-grade-schooler-to-read
https://specialedresource.com/bedtime-routine-for-kids
https://features.apmreports.org/sold-a-story/
Eide, D. (2012). Uncovering the logic of English: a common-sense approach to reading, spelling, and literacy. 2nd ed. pbk. Minneapolis, MN, Pedia Learning Inc.
References
Bell, B. (2017). How to supercharge struggling readers with brain-based strategies! California Reader, 50(4), 12–17.
Gough, P.B. & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
Kelly, L. B., & Moses, L. (2018). Children’s literature that sparks inferential discussions. Reading Teacher, 72(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1675
Masterson, J.J. and Apel, K. (2000). Spelling assessment: Charting a path to optimal intervention. Topics in Language Disorders 20, 50-65.
Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19–35).
National Reading Panel (U.S.) & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read : an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Perry Lecompton School District, Perry KS. (n.d.). Why can’t I skip my 20 minutes of reading tonight?[Infographic]. https://bookkidsblog.wordpress.com/tag/nagy-herman/