Research Questions

This systematic and longitudinal investigation is guided by the following research questions:

1) What are the emotional and behavioral processes of young children's environmental identity development?

2) How are children's emotional and behavioral responses to natural stimuli influenced by social, cultural, and geographical contexts?

3) How can education be used as a tool to support children in developing positive emotional and behavioral responses to natural stimuli?

Click on the links below to explore some emerging findings of the project.

Methods

Environmental Identity Development (EID) Theory

Psychosocial theory of emotions. A psychosocial understanding of emotional development recognizes that emotions and subsequently behavior are individualized and internalized and form the basis of one’s identity (Erikson, 1980). Although the project is designed to examine the sociocultural attributes that influence children’s emotional development in nature within two very different Alaskan communities, it would not be accurate to assume that children within the same social, cultural, or geographical contexts will emotionally respond to nature in the same way. The internal attributes of a child as well as outer influences all contribute to the way in which a child emotionally responds. What can be expected, and what this study intends to do, is examine how an individual’s emotional response to environmental stimuli will change through sociocultural experiences and over time.

Environmental Identity. Environmental identity is an aspect of one’s sense of self, which considers how one identifies with the natural world, “based on history” and “emotional attachment;” it influences the ways in which one “perceive[s] and act[s] towards the world” (Clayton, 2003, pp. 45-46). Environmental identity is particularly important in that it considers how one’s sense of self will direct one’s actions and behaviors towards the natural environment (Clayton & Optow, 2003). While environmental advocacy is the resulting behavior of one who has a strong environmental identity, theory is lacking about how children’s environmental identities emerge.

This project is informed by and informs a theory of Environmental Identity Development (EID) (Green, Kalvaitis, & Worster, 2016; Green, 2018). It stemmed from an interest in linking understanding of child development to environmental education. The theory extends the first four stages of Erikson’s (1980) framework. Children progress through a series of psychosocial dilemmas (stages) in the development of their environmental identity. Progression through each stage is determined by a child’s success in overcoming outer (environmental) and inner (emotional) conflicts attributed to healthy development. In the first stage, Trust in Nature vs. Mistrust in Nature, feelings of trust and security are considered foundational to a child’s environmental identity development. Mistrust in nature would emerge from fearful and anxious encounters with nature that are not adequately negotiated. In the second progression, Spatial Autonomy vs. Environmental Shame, a strong sense of trust in nature propels a child to venture out, independently or with others, to explore and claim their own places. The development of a sense of place allows a child to gain a sense of autonomy with their environment (Green, 2011; 2015). Contrary to spatial autonomy are feelings of environmental shame, which causes a child to withdraw and feel uncomfortable during nature experiences. In the third progression, Environmental Competency vs. Environmental Disdain, children gain confidence in their interactions with nature by acquiring skills and ecological understandings of place (Green, 2013). Feelings of guilt, or a lack of confidence and ecological understanding lead children to demonstrate environmental disdain, or a disregard for nature. In the fourth progression, Environmental Action vs. Environmental Harm, through successful progression in the previous stages, children develop moral values and the know-how to engage in Environmental Action. Failure to progress through one or more stages would result in intentional or unintentional environmental harm. The progression of Environmental Identity Development is fluid meaning that the various progressions are frequently revisited, refined, and/or reestablished with new encounters and experiences in, with, and for nature throughout one’s life. Sociocultural, geographical, and educational contexts influence the way in which a child’s environmental identity is formed. The proposed project will strengthen understanding of the emotional and behavioral attributes of children’s environmental identity development and how sociocultural, geographical, and educational contexts influence children’s nature relationship.

Figure 1. Model of Environmental Identity Development © Carie Green

References

Clayton S. & Optow, S. (2003). Identity and the natural environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Erikson, E.H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York: Norton.

Green, C. (2011). A place of my own: Exploring preschool children’s special places in the home environment. Children, Youth, and Environments, 21(2), 118-144.

Green, C. (2013). A sense of autonomy in young children’s special places. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 1(1), 8-33.

Green, C. (2015). Towards young children as active researchers: A critical review of the methodologies and methods in early childhood environmental education research. Journal of Environmental Education, 46(4), 207-229. DOI:10.1080/00958964.2015.1050345.

Green, C. (2016). Sensory Tours as a Method for Engaging Children as Active Researchers: Exploring the Use of Wearable Cameras in Early Childhood Research. International Journal of Early Childhood, 48(3), 277-294.

Green, C., Kalvaitis, D., & Worster, A. (2016). Recontextualizing psychosocial development in young children: A model of environmental identity development. Environmental Education Research, 22(7), 1025-1048.

Green, C. (2017). Four methods to engage young children as environmental education researchers. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 5, 6-19. Retrieved from https://cdn.naaee.org/sites/default/files/eepro/resource/files/ijecee_51.pdf

Green, C. (2018). Children's Environmental Identity Development: Negotiating tensions in natural-world socialization. New York: Peter Lang.

Contact the Researcher:

Former Research Assistants