After the 11/18/14 retreat on strategies to increase enrollments, the Center for Instructional Support Director and staff developed a Growing Online Enrollments Report (1/15/15) with a further analysis of strengths/opportunities/threats and weaknesses identified at the retreat, key relationships, and possible approaches/actions to follow. CIS began a six-month project (January-June 2015) to analyze capacity and needs associated with growing enrollments through offering courses that are online or in non-traditional formats, and to facilitate development of policies and new practices necessary to successfully expand such offerings.
CIS staff collected and analyzed relevant data about SOU and current online courses and programs (see SOU Online infographic) , as well as national trends in online education (see National Scene). CIS staff conducted 30+ interviews with division directors, chairs, program coordinators, advisors, Enrollment and Retention staff, students and others with important perspectives on the current deployment and perceived needs for online and non-traditional format courses and programs, the current infrastructure to support online students, and barriers encountered by online students.
The purpose of these interviews was to explore the following questions:
After a briefing on data collected and analyzed [Infographic Gallery], and issues encountered by online students [Win, Lose or (With)Draw game], retreat participants took a first pass at the question, “What is one specific thing we can do starting this Spring and build on over the next three years to ensure that our students have a great online learning experience that is consistent across programs, services, and faculty, results in student success, speaks well for the entire University, and provides the ‘SOU experience.’”
Two actionable problem statements were tackled and recommendations made for each.
Actionable Problem Statement: G strands courses involve labs which are difficult to provide to online students.
A pressing issue is that an insufficient number of G-Strand courses (Sciences — Physical, Biological and Computer) are being offered (whether in online, face-to-face, or alternative formats) to meet the needs of SOU students who must take at least three courses in this strand. (See G-strand eligible courses.) In addition, two of the three Strand G courses must include a lab. Only four of 33 G-strand courses are currently taught online, and only two of these are lab courses. As a consequence, many students in our online degree completion programs have difficulty finding a G-strand course and this may delay their degree completion. (Note: Only one G-strand course has been offered in hybrid format.) Face-to-face students also have fewer choices of sections available because fewer are being offered as class sizes are increased, and this leads to scheduling challenges for students.
Recommendation: Explore student needs for G-strand courses to support degree completion. Pilot courses in online and alternative formats that can meet these needs, and provide faculty development and support for pilots.
Status Update 7/16
Actionable Problem Statement: Differing expectations result in dissatisfaction for faculty and students.
There is a disconnect between what faculty think is good service and what students expect from their instructors. As a consequence, students who need to take online courses in order to graduate in a timely manner may avoid them because they have had a negative experience with an online course. Faculty may avoid them for the same reason.
Recommendation: Define and communicate reasonable expectations (for the institution, faculty and students) regarding online courses. This does not require everyone to teach the same way, but expectation management contributes to a positive experience.
Status Update 7/16
Retreat participants reviewed a series of scenarios, out of which a draft shared decision framework for identifying courses and programs will be developed for online and alternative formats. The decision framework should:
Anticipated work product: Recommendations concerning guidelines for online course quality (design and delivery), to be addressed in a formal policy to be submitted for Faculty Senate approval.
Process: Ensure the quality of the online learning experience for SOU students by developing and formally adopting course quality standards. This process must be faculty-driven. A task force will be convened to develop the guidelines for online course design, development and assessment. The task force will also develop recommendations regarding resources necessary to maintain quality of online and alternative-format courses.
Adoption of policy and design framework that will maximize and enhance existing offerings, and enable new online courses/programs to be identified and offered.
These initial phases will create a solid foundation for building institutional policies and developing broad strategies for online teaching and learning.
Informed by the work products of Phases 1-6, this strategic framework would articulate objectives, priorities, institutional capacity (including funding model) and metrics for growth, assessment and enhancement of online instruction at SOU. The statement would address the key relationships for successful expansion of online and alternative format course offerings. Potential institutional priorities and approaches that have already been identified (and would be prioritized during the earlier phases) include: