Publications

For a full list of publications and presentations, please see 'About' page for updated curriculum vitae. Only publications from past 6 years listed here.

Publications

1. Allison, M., Jung, S., & Culhane, S. E. (2023). The effect of alibi consistency, presence of physical evidence, and timing of disclosure on mock juror perceptions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2023.2206869 

2. Pham, A., Hilton, N. Z., Ennis, L., Nunes, K. L., & Jung, S. (2023). Predicting recidivism in a high-risk sample of intimate partner violent men referred for police threat assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221143535 

3. Pham, A., & Jung, S. (2022). Risk constructs behind Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment. Victims & Offenders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2022.2117750 

4. *Himmen, M., *Thomas, M., *Scavuzzo, R., & Jung, S. (2023). Can community notifications be improved to reduce misinformation and change public perceptions of the criminal justice system? International Journal of Law, Crime, and Justice, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100607

5. Peters, J. R., Nunes, K. L. Ennis, L., Hilton, N. Z., Pham, A. T., & Jung, S. (2023). Latent case analysis of the heterogeneity of intimate partner violent men: Implications for research and practice. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 10(3), 202-219. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000192

6. *Thomas, M. L., *Himmen, M. K., & Jung, S. (2022). Sexual violence perpetration against intimate partners: Current progress and future directions. Current Psychiatry Reports, 24, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-022-01373-w

7. Jung, S., & *Himmen, M. K. (2022). A field study of the police use of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA). Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 9(4), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000175

8. Jung, S., & *Thomas, M. (2022). A compendium of risk tools for assessing youths who engage in sexually abusive behaviours. Sexual Offending: Theory, Research, and Prevention, 17, e8085. https://doi.org/10.5964/sotrap.8085 

9. Jung, S., & Kitura, G. (2022). Offenders on judicial restraint orders: Implications for evidence-based supervision and risk management in policing. Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being, 7(1), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.222.  

10. Pham, A. T., Nunes, K. L., Maimone, S., & Jung, S. (2022). Childhood sexual victimization, pedophilic interest, and antisocial orientation. Sexual Offending: Theory, Research, and Prevention, 17, e5425. https://doi.org/10.5964/sotrap.5425 

11. Jung, S., *Himmen, M., *Velupillai, N., & Buro, K. (2022). Does stalking behavior improve risk prediction of intimate partner violence? Victims & Offenders, 17(4), 553-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2021.1963899 

12. Salerno-Ferraro, A., & Jung, S. (2022). To charge or not to charge? Police decisions in sexual assault cases and the relevance of rape myths. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 23(5), 539-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2021.2002150

13. Hilton, N. Z., Pham, A. T., Jung, S., Nunes, K., & Ennis, L. (2021). Risk scores and reliability of the SARA, SARA-V3, B-SAFER, and ODARA among intimate partner violence (IPV) cases referred for threat assessment. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 22(1), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2020.1798235 

14. Jung, S., *Faitakis, M., & *Cheema, H. (2021). A comparative profile of intimate partner sexual violence. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 27(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2020.1722268 

15. *Adams, L., & Jung, S. (2020). Partisan allegiance in legal cases involving sexual assault. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 63, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2020.100423 

16. Jung, S., Allison, M., *Toop, C., & Martin, E. (2020). Stakeholders’ perceptions of sex offender registries. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27(3), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1733698    

17. Allison, M., Jung, S., & Benjamin, A. (2020). Alibi believability: Corroborative evidence and contextual factors. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 38(4), 337-354. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2473  

18. Zara, G., Farrington, D., & Jung, S. (2020). Denial in sex offending treatment: Examining criminal career diversity. Journal of Forensic Psychology: Research and Practice, 20(5), 451-473.  https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2020.1776050

19. Sparks, B., *Wielinga, F., Jung, S., & Olver, M. (2020). Recidivism risk and criminogenic needs of individuals who perpetrated intimate partner sexual violence offenses. Sexual Offending: Theory, Research, and Prevention, 15(1), e3713. https://doi.org/10.5964/sotrap.3713

20. Pettersen, C., Nunes, K. L., Kostiuk, N., Jung, S., & Atlas, M. (2020). Explicit and implicit self-esteem, narcissism, and recidivism risk in a sample of men who have sexually offended against children. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01598-6

21. Jung, S., & *Stewart, J. (2019). Exploratory comparison between fatal and non-fatal cases of intimate partner. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 11, 158-168. 

22. *Toop, C., Olver, M. E., & Jung, S. (2019). Forensic assessment with the PAI in correctional samples: Implications for RNR. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46, 866-883.

23. Jung, S., & *Wielinga, F. (2019). Simplifying the estimation of violence risk by police among individuals charged for sexual assault. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 6, 38-50.

24. Jung, S., *Toop, C., & Ennis, L. (2018). Identifying risk-relevant criminogenic needs using the Personality Assessment Inventory with males who have sexually offended. Sexual Abuse, 30, 992–1009.

25. Jung, S. (2018). Sexual violence risk prediction in a police context. Sexual Abuse, 30, 576-592.

26. Tedeschini, J., & Jung, S. (2018). Motivational interviewing in the context of police investigative interviews. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 9, 1-13.

27. Jung, S., Allison, M., & Martin, E. (2018). Perspectives of Americans and Canadians on the use and function of sex offender registries. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 52, 106-117.

28. Jung, S., *Wielinga, F., & Ennis, L. (2018). Can we keep it simple? Using the BARR-2002R with a community-based sex offender sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 24, 25-36.  (free access up to 50 ePrints, click here) 

29. Olver, M., & Jung, S. (2017). Incremental validity of intimate partner violence risk prediction. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 440-453. 

30. Ennis, L., *Toop, C., Jung, S., & *Bois, S. (2017). Instrumental and reactive intimate partner violence: Offender characteristics, re-offense rates, and risk management. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 4, 61-76.

31. Jung, S., & Buro, K. (2017). Appraising risk for intimate partner violence in a police context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 240-260.

32. Jung, S., Ennis, L., Hermann, C. A., *Pham, A. T., Choy, A. L., *Corabian, G., & Hook, T. (2017). An evaluation of the reliability, construct validity, and factor structure of the Static-2002R. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 464-487.

Newsletter and Non-Peer Reviewed Articles

1. Jung, S., & Mendoza, J. (2023, Oct 2). Riskier times on campuses mean we need a tool for prevention and intervention of sexual assaults. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/riskier-times-on-campuses-mean-we-need-a-tool-for-prevention-and-intervention-of-sexual-assaults-213846  

2. Hilton, N. Z., & Jung, S. (2023, Sep 4). Police-academic partnerships could help tackle the crime of coercive control. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/police-academic-partnerships-could-help-tackle-the-crime-of-coercive-control-211965   

3. Jung, S., Mendoza, J., & Gothoskar, R. (2023, Mar 6). Addressing campus sexual violence: New risk assessment tool can help administrators make difficult decisions. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/addressing-campus-sexual-violence-new-risk-assessment-tool-can-help-administrators-make-difficult-decisions-199714 

4. Jung, S., & Mendoza, J. (2022, July). Building a new gender-based violence risk tool for campuses: Why re-invent the wheel? Courage to Act. www.couragetoact.ca/blog/community-risk-assessment

5. Tedeschini, J., & Jung, S. (2022, Spring). Motivational interviewing: Helping people find their own reasons for change. Council for School Leadership Magazine, 4(1).

6. Mendoza, J., & Jung, S. (2021, November). Gender-Based Violence Community Risk Assessment. Courage to Act. www.couragetoact.ca/blog/community-risk-assessment 

7. Jung, S., & *Dunlop, D. (2021, Spring). Is case prioritization risk-relevant in a law enforcement setting? Crime Scene, 28(1), 9-16.

8. Jung, S. (2019, Summer). FAQs column: What are the RNR principles? ATSA Forum Newsletter, 31(3). Available from http://www.atsa.com

9. Maltais, N., & Jung, S. (2019, Summer). Perceptions on RNR. ATSA Forum Newsletter, 31(3). Available from http://www.atsa.com

10. Perrault, L. P., Faitakis, M. E., Bencic, R. M., LaPierre, A. R., & Morrill, A. N. (2018, Fall/Winter). 5 things to know before conducting research in law enforcement. Crime Scene, 25(2), 16-17.

11. Faitakis, M. (2018-2019, Winter). Differences in perpetrators of intimate partner violence who sexually assault. ATSA Forum Newsletter, 31(1).

12. Jung, S., & Pagé, F. (2017, Spring). Translating intimate partner violence research into evidence-based policing practices. Crime Scene, 24(1), 5-8.

Books and Chapters

1. Jung, S. (2022). Applying RNR principles to effectively treat people who have committed a sexual offence. In K. Uzieblo, W. J. Smid, K. McCartan (Eds), Challenges in the Management of People Convicted of a Sexual Offence. Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80212-7_10

2. Jung, S. (2019). Inmate denial of criminal risk. In R. D. Morgan (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Criminal Psychology. Sage.

3. Jung, S., & Zara, G. (2018). Diniego e resistenza al trattamento negli aggressori sessuali [Denial and resistance to treatment in sexual aggressors]. In G. Zara (Ed.), Il diniego nei aggressori sessuali - CID-SO– Versione Italiana [The denial of sexual aggressors: From evaluation to treatment].Milan, Italy: Raffaello Cortina Publisher.

4. Jung, S. (2017). RNR principles in practice in the management and treatment of sexual abusers. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.

5. Jung, S. (2017). Treatment of online offenders: Current best practice and next steps (pp. 73-95). In J. Brown (Ed.), Online risk to children: Impact, protection and prevention. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley. 

Manuals and Reports

1. Jung, S., & Mendoz, J. (2023). A Gender-Based and Sexualized Violence Community Risk Assessment Tool for Post-Secondary Settings. Possibility Seeds. 

* denote MacEwan students