Melpar Incorporated
Wikipedia 🌐 Melpar
For such an important and influential military tech company, Melpar Inc. is extremely difficult to find information on.
Also see :
E-Systems, Incorporated ( LTV Electrosystems acquired American Standard Inc.'s Melpar Division in 1970 and established a new Commercial Services Division in Greenville to perform heavy structural modification and maintenance for the airlines. In 1971 LTV Electrosystems acquired Hamilton Watch Company's Electronics division and established a new domestic international sales company known as Electrosystems Export Company. Nevertheless, after unloading several of its acquisitions, employment in 1970 was down to 7,000 from a high in 1968 of more than 11,000. In 1972, E-Systems emerged as an independent, publicly owned corporation, headed by John W. Dixon, who had served as LTV Electrosystems' president and chief executive officer since 1969. )
Raytheon Intelligence, Information, and Services Business Unit ( In 1995, Raytheon Company acquired E-Systems, Inc. ; E-Systems was renamed Raytheon Intelligence and Information Systems. )
Notable employees :
Dr. Donald Malcolm MacArthur (born 1931) ( "From 1958 to 1966, [Dr. Donald MacArthur] was with Melpar Inc., where he developed the Life Science Laboratories and directed the Chemistry and Life Sciences Division. ") [HN00T2][GDrive]
Founded 1945
Headquarters Northern Virginia
Services Government research and development
Melpar was an American government contractor in the 20th century Cold War period. At a time when most employment in Washington, DC was directly by the US federal government, Melpar became an early private sector contracting company training a high technology workforce in the area.
History
In 1945, after the conclusion of World War II, the founders of Melpar Inc (Thomas Meloy and Joseph Parks), at the suggestion of the United States Navy, moved from New York City to the Washington, DC area to obtain government contracts.[1] Meloy had served as an assistant to Henry Stimson during the war. The company name was derived from the first syllable of their last names.[2] In late 1945 Parks accidentally killed himself in a hunting accident; nevertheless Meloy continued promote developing Melpar as an engineering and production company doing business with the Armed forces. He acquired the Carl Miller Engineering Company, a small firm that designed and produced electro-mechanical products. The new company took over a contract for airborne radar systems, and expanded. In the next few years Melpar moved to Alexandria, Virginia, added a second plant in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and a third plant in Alexandria. Within 15 years the company grew to more than 6,000 employees, and occupied ten facilities of more than 1,000,000 square feet (93,000 m2) throughout Northern Virginia.
Events such as the Berlin Airlift, the detonation of the nuclear weapons by the Soviet Union, and the outbreak of the Korean War helped Melpar's business. In addition to military applications, technology began to play a role in nonmilitary areas. The US government had a pool of technical talent in its laboratories, and assumed an expanded role. The launch of Sputnik in 1957 further intensified competition with the Soviet Union.
Melpar embraced rather than shunned government work, as did most other companies. In 1951 Westinghouse Air Brake Company, a railway equipment producer founded in 1869, purchased the company for $1 million. It was a large sum for the time, despite typical profits on government contracts of only 1-2% of sales, which were generally reinvested in research.
The 1990s saw the development of the Internet, and its emphasis on computer science, information systems, and software technology. During the 1970s and 1980s a similar fervor was experienced in the telecommunications and biotechnology sectors. However, during the 1950s and 1960s the most exciting technical place to advance the knowledge was the fledgling aerospace and electronics industry. The 1950-60's had many new firms and people readily working long hours. A unique feature of the 1950s, however, was that the US government, not the commercial marketplace, was the prime source of funding of new technologies.
Melpar was located near its customers in Washington, DC. Other government contractors such as Atlantic Research, Vitro Laboratories, Page Communications Engineers, Hazleton Laboratories, COMSAT and the Applied Physics Laboratory also benefited. However, Melpar was the largest. In 1963, openings included astronomers, astrophysicists, microbiologists, entomologists, geophysicists and gas chromatagraphers. Melpar filled a void due to the lack of a technical university in the area (Melpar welcomed George Mason University in 1964).[3]
In 1952 Melpar built an expensive, modern plant 10 miles (16 km) from downtown on a 44-acre (180,000 m2) wooded tract near Seven Corners on Route 50. The new building, surrounded by fields in a campus-like setting 400 feet (120 m) back from the road, had a pond, willow trees, brick facade, and parking behind the plant. It was a contrast to the small buildings and warehouses located downtown, and was promoted as harmonizing industrial design with residential surroundings. To accommodate Melpar, Fairfax County revamped its zoning laws to help relieve the tax burden on property owners. Melpar employees could work near their homes. In development advertising the state of Virginia touted Melpar as a model.[citation needed] The decision to move to the country was made more than ten years before the "circumferential highway" was completed, and more than 15 years before a shopping mall now known as Tysons Corner Center was built at Tyson's Corner. Later known as the Capital Beltway, this highway led to the term beltway bandits for the contracting firms that later proliferated.[2]
Melpar linked production facilities to its scientific and engineering capabilities. The company won two large contracts for B-58 aircraft electronics and Minuteman missile guidance components, requiring a buildup of manufacturing plants and an associated technical work force in the Washington area. These facilities enabled scientists to test their laboratory research with prototype hardware. By 1960 the company assembled products such as missile equipment, flight simulators, radar beacons, fuses, data processing equipment, communications, antennas, electronic countermeasure and reconnaissance systems.
Managing manufacturing programs presented a different set of challenges. Since Washington did not have a workforce of electronic technicians Melpar had to build and train one. The Minuteman production line required 1,800 people and as many as 130 were hired in a single day. Technology schools such as the Capitol Radio Engineering Institute expanded to help train designers and draftsmen to build products for space and missile programs. Universities conducted technical courses in Melpar's facilities for employees on their own time, in programs praised by the Secretary of Education. Melpar instituted tuition-reimbursement policies with incentives for high grades in technical courses. Positions for minorities and females opened at unprecedented levels.[citation needed]
During this time the company also pioneered manufacturing technology. Unlike today when existing commercial off-the-shelf technology is available, manufacturing had to translate ideas quickly into producible reality. Intense development occurred in areas of microelectronics technology such as fabrication and layout of miniature circuits, and use of thin film devices and plastic components. Processes such as welding, plating, soldering and automatic component insertion were studied and improved. Melpar's manufacturing engineers often found themselves writing engineering process documents that eventually became the government standard.
Melpar performed diverse research in physical and life sciences over 40 years. One project begun in the late 1950s (foreshadowing artificial intelligence) linked biology and the design of electrical devices–computer programs that emulated artificial nerve cells and simulated functions such as learning ability and initiative. The intent was to construct a thinking machine, similar to a human nervous system that learned pattern recognition and avoided mistakes (e.g. programming a mobile satellite on the moon to avoid a deep precipice). Studies on the nature of speech led to more efficient use of the radio spectrum through bandwidth compression, and improved long distance and coded communications–other related studies focused on elimination of speech deficiencies and development of a phonetic typewriter. In medical research Melpar developed synthetic materials (tissue growth) to be compatible with the heart (later known as the Jarvik heart), and produced an electronic heart monitor (Cardiac Sentry) which detected out-of-norm variations, maintained hospital records and administered prescribed treatments. The company was a pioneer in plasma physics and developed materials for communicating with manned space vehicles reentering the atmosphere. Using solar energy, desalinization experiments were conducted to make saline and brackish water drinkable. Detection systems to measure highway curves, motions and vibrations were developed to improvemass transit systems.
Melpar performed studies in cell biology, food chemistry, composite materials (light weight, high temperature), solar energy, meteorology, virology and immunology (cancer research), air and water pollution, air traffic control, global navigation (constructed a prototype map of the Global Positioning System), and underwater acoustics and optics. They studied methane detection in mines and conversion of coal to acetylene as a new source of energy. An antenna was placed on top of the Empire State Building to evaluate the feasibility of UHF broadcasting. Offshoot products from laboratory technology included resins, varnishes, foam, nonsmudge ink, adhesives, photoelectric readers and frequency standard instrumentation. Synthetic diamonds and emeralds were produced to test hardness in space age materials. While most of Melpar's efforts were technical, some involved the social sciences–creation of a stock index of S&P 500 companies for Business Week, and operation of a Job Corps center.
Melpar continued its work on military and space applications such as radar, communications, and electronic counter measure systems as well as airborne and ground intelligence systems. Devices to detect lethal chemical and biological agents were developed. The company participated in early unmanned (Vanguard and Explorer) and manned space programs (Mercury and Apollo), providing antennas and semidried food for lunar missions. A quarantine facility was produced to insure the astronauts had not brought any contamination from the moon.
Melpar also produced more than a dozen flight simulators, including many of the Air Force's century series fighters and helicopter systems for the Navy. These simulators enabled more realistic and demanding training, saving pilots' lives and reducing fuel consumption during the 1970s energy crisis.
A company newspaper editorial in 1957 stated, "We have sought the breeder job, the line of inquiry promising to expand a general field of engineering endeavor or open a new one."[citation needed]
However, in the mid-1960s Melpar's research, engineering and production began to decline. The government's budget priorities changed, with emphasis placed on solving the nation's social problems.The human spaceflight program had few follow-on missions after landing a man on the moon. The military's budget was heavily dedicated to the Vietnam War. These budget trends reduced Melpar's programs.
Other factors contributed to the business decline. The government did not award follow-on manufacturing contracts, so layoffs of production workers took place. The American Standard Companies, bought the Westinghouse Air Brake Company, and immediately began to sell off the assets. Melpar's research programs were diverse, unprofitable, and had uncertain business prospects.
Some unfavorable publicity contributed to Melpar's misfortunes. In 1963 Bobby Baker was Secretary for the Majority Democratic caucus in the US Senate, and closely linked to Lyndon B. Johnson - he held perhaps the most powerful nonelected position in Congress. A Melpar vending machine contractor filed a lawsuit against Baker, accusing him of influence peddling to switch the contract to a competitor, with which he had financial ties. Within a few days Baker resigned his position. For almost two years there were headlines and congressional investigations into Baker's business deals and questionable relationships. Melpar's top management was called to testify before the Senate Rules committee, although ultimately the Melpar incident was settled out of court. Even so, the situation demoralized employees, did not enhance the company's ability to win new Government contracts, and changes in company management soon took place.
An investigation was also ordered into overpricing of the B-58 systems.[4]
Some employees left Melpar to start new companies (usually in the Washington area). Over the next 20 to 30 years more than a dozen spin-offs generated millions of dollars in annual sales and employed thousands in the Washington area. One employee began a communications company in Florida that ultimately became the Harris Corporation. Two employees from a research division near Boston formed the data communications manufacturer Codex Corporation in 1962.[5] . Many prospered in the 1970s and 1980s, but then left the area, due to industrial consolidations, mergers, and acquisitions. Meloy Laboratories continued Melpar's biotechnical, pharmaceutical research until Rhône-Poulenc moved the operation to Philadelphia in the 1980s. A flight simulator spin-off named Simulation Engineering Corporation (Secor), went through four changes in ownership in Northern Virginia–from Sperry Rand to Honeywell to Hughes to Raytheon - before being moved to Texas in 1998. The same employees started a second company, Quintron, which was purchased by Loral for $22 million and later owned by Lockheed. A few companies still reside in Northern Virginia –VSE Inc in Alexandria (1300 employees), RSI Inc in Sterling (500 employees), ISOMET in Springfield, ST Research (now a division of Boeing called Argon ST[6]) in Newington, as well as half a dozen small machine shops.[citation needed]
For almost 50 years Melpar used the same facility on U.S. Route 50 in Virginia and had about 1,500 employees. The company went through several changes in ownership, being purchased by LTV Electrosystems in 1970 (changed to E-Systems in 1972) and the Raytheon Company in 1995. The name Melpar was discontinued in 1994 and the facility served as headquarters for Raytheon's Strategic Systems Division. Over the last 25 to 30 years the company performed some government electronics contracts, such as production and support of ground systems for the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft, and unmanned aerial vehicles. Additionally this facility managed information systems for agencies such as the US Department of Education, and fabricated and tested electronic products. In 2010 Raytheon moved out of the building at 7700 Arlington Boulevard, and it was remodeled for Tricare.[7][8]
2018 - A video I found of an ex-Melpar employee
Source - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUVlwELjYFg
2018-12-23-youtube-david-jolkovski-melpar (.jpg / .pdf / .mp4 ) /
Melpar ( Dec 23, 2018)
David Jolkovski
"Meloy Laboratories continued Melpar's biotechnical, pharmaceutical research until Rhône-Poulenc moved the operation to Philadelphia in the 1980s. "
history of DoD research - good
https://books.google.com/books?id=Xkm8awAlBNMC&pg=PA24&lpg=PA24&dq=melpar+history&source=bl&ots=XAg5XLWaIg&sig=ACfU3U01pP-V3hOtObNxCPTfBt2STgMxzg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZ-t7plo_qAhUkoXIEHUXEB8UQ6AEwCHoECAsQAQ#v=onepage&q=melpar%20history&f=false
june 8 1961
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0925/ML092580609.pdf
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19660025318.pdf
https://books.google.com/books?id=RN8VIZjnsRYC&pg=PA50&lpg=PA50&dq=melpar+history&source=bl&ots=XBbAHWosep&sig=ACfU3U2B-0fFQKD37Z5tubMyAWOns-zt1Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZ-t7plo_qAhUkoXIEHUXEB8UQ6AEwCnoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=melpar%20history&f=false
https://books.google.com/books?id=nthSDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT195&lpg=PT195&dq=melpar+history&source=bl&ots=ZyMEkX8rYl&sig=ACfU3U34_XU65JMSyqYiFCVrV55RZIEqSA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZ-t7plo_qAhUkoXIEHUXEB8UQ6AEwC3oECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=melpar%20history&f=false
https://books.google.com/books?id=Yor4DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA218&lpg=PA218&dq=melpar+history&source=bl&ots=SjYjvSZXBZ&sig=ACfU3U2XAux_H32_yBDlrzMUpinTo3oVUw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZ-t7plo_qAhUkoXIEHUXEB8UQ6AEwDHoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=melpar%20history&f=false
https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/607072main_WhenBiospheresCollide-ebook.pdf
607072main_WhenBiospheresCollide-ebook
https://www.worldcat.org/title/effects-of-r-f-energy-on-biological-macromolecules/oclc/50373688
Effects of R-F energy on biological macromolecules.
Author: Melpar, Inc.; US Army Edgewood Arsenal Chemical Research and Development Laboratories.
Publisher: Fall Church, Va. [1963?]-
Series: AD 618472, etc.
Edition/Format: Journal, magazine : English
Pages 105 - 106 : International Relationships
Since World War II, American military operations research
organizations had cooperated closely with their counterparts
in Britain and Canada. ORO personnel worked
closely with British and Canadian operations analysts in
Korea, and the offi ce maintained a full-time liaison offi cer
with the British Army Operational Research Establishment
(AORE).184 Another important means of maintaining contact
with the British and Canadian OR organizations was the
series of annual Tripartite (later Quadripartite, with the addition
of the Australians) Conferences on Army Operations
Research, the fi rst of which was held in London in April 1949
and the second of which was hosted by ORO in Washington
in October 1950.185 Each conference concentrated on a specifi
c major topic and was attended by representatives from
ORO, AORE, and the Canadian Army Operational Research
Establishment (CAORE), as well as representatives from the
OR organizations of the other services in all three countries.
Th e British and Canadians also frequently participated
in conferences sponsored by other U.S. Army agencies,
such as the annual Army OR symposium sponsored
by the Ordnance Corps Army Research Offi ce (Durham).
At the second such symposium in March 1962, G. Neville
Gadsby of AORE explained that his organization included
a small element with the director of operational science and
research in the War Offi ce and the main AORE, located at
West Byfl eet a few miles outside London, which included
an integrated staff of military and civilian analysts divided
into subelements covering weapons, tactics, fi eld studies,
general studies (logistics, economics, communications,
and so forth), human factors, and clothing and equipment
physiology.186 As Gadsby explained, AORE was on a level
with two other British Army OR groups, one in Germany
(Operational Research Section, British Army of the Rhine)
and one in southeast Asia (Operational Research Unit, Far
East). At the same symposium, Henry H. Watson discussed
the CAORE, which then was physically located at Canadian
Army Headquarters in Ottawa and reported directly to the
scientifi c advisor to the chief of the General Staff .187 Watson
also explained that the entire staff of CAORE, which included
military personnel, was in Ottawa and that CAORE
conducted a program of research projects (10–15 percent of
which were self generated) that fell into two main groups:
tactical studies and systems studies.188
In the 1950s, the other nations of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO) also began to set up OR organizations,
as did NATO itself.189 In the mid-1950s, an
international OR group composed primarily of the British
and the Canadians was established under Headquarters,
Allied Air Forces Central Europe, at Fontainebleau, France,
and a group led by Dr. H. F. Robertson was organized at
Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE).190
From 1953 the NATO Advisory Group on Aeronautical
Research and Development (AGARD) (and later the OR
group at SHAPE) was active in promoting lectures on operations
research and helping interested nations form their
own OR groups.191 Robertson’s team at SHAPE also organized
a number of conferences on OR in the various NATO
member nations. Th e fi rst conference, in 1955, had 30 participants
from only four nations, but the third gathering, held
in November 1956, had 120 participants representing all
but two of the NATO countries.192 In April 1957, the fourday
NATO conference on operational research sponsored
by AGARD was held at the Palais de Chaillot in Paris.193
Th e chief aims of the conference were to interest high-level
NATO administrators in the need for OR and to familiarize
NATO technical and operating personnel with the latest
research methods.194 As the supreme allied commander in
Europe, U.S. Air Force General Lauris Norstad, told attendees
at the conference:
Operational research, by revealing methods for more eff ective
utilization of our manpower, our skills, our material and our
resources, is making a signifi cant contribution to the military
potential of the Atlantic Alliance. Th is is of utmost importance,
for our strength depends not alone on what we have but to a
large extent on what we do with what we have.195
Th e attendees at the second SHAPE operations research
conference, held at HQ SHAPE on 14–15 February
1956, noted that most NATO OR groups were in the
central geographical area, with few in the NATO “fl ank”
countries.196 In March 1956 AGARD organized a threeman
team—Th ornton Page (from the ORO fi eld offi ce in
Heidelberg), Tony Sargeaunt (from the SHAPE scientifi c
advisory staff ), and Glen D. Camp (from Melpar, Inc.)—to
conduct a two-week trip to Italy, Greece, and Turkey to
promote OR and help organize OR groups.197 Th e Italian
General Staff expressed interest and asked for a followup
visit, and, on 1 June 1956, the Turks established an OR
group within the Turkish General Staff Scientifi c Advisory
Board comprising ten reserve offi cers with mathematics and
scientifi c training under the direction of Turkish Air Force
Col. Fuat Ulug.198
As of 1956, allied OR groups in NATO included those
at the headquarters of the British Army of the Rhine, the Second
Allied Tactical Air Force, and the Canadian Infantry Brigade
Group (all near Dusseldorf ); a RAND representative
and elements of the Offi ce of Operations Analysis at Headquarters,
United States Air Forces Europe, in Wiesbaden;
the ORO fi eld offi ce at Headquarters, United States Army
Europe; Headquarters, Twelfth U.S. Air Force at Ramstein;
Headquarters Allied Air Forces Central Europe at Fontainebleau;
two Navy analysts at Headquarters, Commander
SOUTH near Naples; the Air Defense Technical Center in
Th e Hague; SHAPE near Paris; and the Turkish OR group
under Col. Ulug.199 By 1963, Norway had an OR group of
approximately 450 people concentrated in the Norwegian
Defence Research Establishment (NDRE).200 By that time,
operations research in NATO was focused in the SHAPE
Air Defence Technical Center (SADTC), roughly 40 percent
of whose scientifi c staff (thirty-fi ve analysts) were assigned to
OR tasks.201 Th e SADTC analysts generated 70–80 percent
of their own projects, and, as with the NDRE, military offi -
cers were seconded to participate in specifi c projects.202
https://www.governmentattic.org/10docs/TechRptsDPG_1961-1965.pdf
CBRNIAC Number: CB-046345
AD Number: 326213
Site Holding: CB DT DW 509471
Title: Investigation of Bioelectro-Chemical Methods for Detection of Toxic CW Agents. Phase 3A. Final Comprehensive Report, 1 February-30 September 1961.
Author(s): MacArthur, D. M. Ambrose, J. F.
Report Number: DPG-62-0816
Publish Date: 1961-10-01
Corp Author Name: MELPAR FALLS CHURCH VA
Distribution Statement: Distribution limited to US Gov't agencies and their contractors. Other requests for this document shall be referred to Chemical Warfare Laboratories, Army Chemical Center, MD.
Document Classification: S
CBRNIAC Number: CB-046367
AD Number: 325557
Site Holding: CB DT DW 537601
Title: Research in the Area of CW Warning and Detection. Phase 3. Final Report, 1 January-31 August 1961. Author(s): MacArthur, D. M. Chaudet, J. H.
Report Number:
Publish Date: 1961-09-01
Corp Author Name: MELPAR FALLS CHURCH VA
Distribution Statement: Distribution limited to US Gov't agencies and their contractors. Document Classification: S
CBRNIAC Number: CB-046368
AD Number: 325556
Site Holding: DT DW
Title: Research in the Area of CW Warning and Detection. Volume 2 (Sections 4-6). Author(s): Chaudet, J. H. MacArthur, D. M.
Report Number:
Publish Date: 1961-08-01
Corp Author Name: MELPAR INC FALLS CHURCH VA
Distribution Statement: Distribution limited to US Gov't agencies and their contractors. Document Classification: C
melpar life sciences laboratories
https://books.google.com/books?id=9zlc1lcRd44C&pg=PA7&lpg=PA7&dq=melpar+LIFE+SCIENCE+LABORATORIES,&source=bl&ots=90iASJrXzI&sig=ACfU3U1CXmOhzYYqNGtol-W9H3JpiqxM7Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi5yISErYXqAhV2QzABHY8XBToQ6AEwAnoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=melpar%20LIFE%20SCIENCE%20LABORATORIES%2C&f=false
april 2 1968 - aboutlabs
https://books.google.com/books?id=QTkVAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA146&lpg=PA146&dq=melpar+LIFE+SCIENCE+LABORATORIES,&source=bl&ots=AE18jbwugQ&sig=ACfU3U2ctD5qH5982pNovsikWUzx98UEjQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi5yISErYXqAhV2QzABHY8XBToQ6AEwA3oECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=melpar%20LIFE%20SCIENCE%20LABORATORIES%2C&f=false
1951 (Sep 29) - Westinghouse air brake purchases all stock of Melpar Inc.
https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1951/09/29/89462249.html?pageNumber=32
1953
https://www.newspapers.com/image/89764945/?terms=melpar
1956
https://www.newspapers.com/image/581830667/?terms=melpar
1959
https://www.newspapers.com/image/290258460/?terms=melpar
1961/62 - bionic mouse
http://cyberneticzoo.com/tag/artificial-neural-network/
1962
1965 (November)
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19660022516.pdf
1965-11-nasa-proceedings-of-experimenters-info-meeting-on-the-apollo-applications-program-in-bioscience.pdf
1965 - Melpar - biowarfare ...
Toxicologic Assessment of the Army's Zinc Cadmium Sulfide Dispersion Tests
Subcommittee on Zinc Cadmium Sulfide, Commission on Life Sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council
National Academies Press, Jun 13, 1997 - Political Science - 351 pages
During the 1950s and 1960s, the U.S. Army conducted atmospheric dispersion tests in many American cities using fluorescent particles of zinc cadmium sulfide (ZnCdS) to develop and verify meteorological models to estimate the dispersal of aerosols. Upon learning of the tests, many citizens and some public health officials in the affected cities raised concerns about the health consequences of the tests. This book assesses the public health effects of the Army's tests, including the toxicity of ZnCdS, the toxicity of surrogate cadmium compounds, the environmental fate of ZnCdS, the extent of public exposures from the dispersion tests, and the risks of such exposures.
1997-us-national-academies-press-toxicology-assessment-of-armys-zinc-cadmium-sulfide-dispersion-tests-google-books-into / -pg-229 / -pg-230
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bAFqGkZvXCkogWT-AAXtUcaebZC3oBm8/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xiSDL1s4eWYU-3co-yqri805ZaHIx1wA/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xiSDL1s4eWYU-3co-yqri805ZaHIx1wA/view?usp=sharing
1998 Cheryl Welsh - "The Code of the Brain : How the US Government Won the Arms Race to Control Man" - Main points only, from MindJustice.com
https://nutesla.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/The-1950s-Secret-Discovery-of-the-Code-of-the-Brain-..pdf
1998-code-of-the-brain-us-government-won-arms-race-by-cheryl-walsh-main-points-only-from-mindjustice-com
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-aVDce65ASda6BSfbIcs3lnDSG3Eu6U3/view?usp=sharing
The 1950s Secret Discovery ...
High-temperature Superconductors
(HTSC) contains the theory and basis for the technology used for remotely detecting brainwaves from a distance. Currently the military is developing it for remote sensing. While this may not be the classified mind reading technology used today, the point is to see that the level of technology is possible and the scientific theory behind mind reading can be figured out, even if it is classified. Please note that the Jonathan Tennenbaum article mentions HTSC and it's use for mind control weapons. Here is a list of articles on HTSC with brief comments.
Hewish, Mark. (1992,June 1). High-temperature Superconductors. International Defense Review. Vol.25. No.6;
Pg. 624. "The United States government Office Of Technology Assessment believes that electronic components using high-temperature superconductors (HTSCs) will be available by the mid-1990s. ...DARPA (the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) has awarded several contracts for work on HTSCs. E-Systems 'Melpar Division leads a team--including several universities and specialist companies such as Superconductor Technologies and Conductus--that has a $9.7 million contract from the agency to demonstrate a feasible approach to defense applications of HTSCs by 1994.
...HTSCs first made their appearance in 1986, when two researchers at the IBM laboratories in Zurich--who won a Nobel prize for their work...Radio-frequency energy encounters some resistance even in a superconductor, but this is negligible at frequencies below 1 GHz. ...Most radars of military interest operate at frequencies below 120GHz...
1988-03-21-washington-post-meloy-packs-test-tubes-new-home.pdf
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fN4Tv6_-EqEIIqnGRHnBBue5UZQgGoWa/view?usp=sharing
The Washington Post
MELOY PACKS ITS TEST TUBES FOR NEW HOME
By Malcolm Gladwell
March 21, 1988
Meloy Laboratories, one of the Washington area's pioneering biomedical
research companies, is moving out.
Over the next few weeks, Rorer Group Inc., the large Pennsylvania
pharmaceutical company that bought Meloy two years ago, will move
Meloy's Springfield laboratory and 80 of its scientists to Rorer's central
research facility in Fort Washington, Pa.
The loss of Meloy is not a major blow to this area's burgeoning
biotechnology community -- there are more than 100 biotech firms in the
area, with companies coming and going each month.
But in many ways Meloy -- which grew out of the concerted effort to find a
cure for cancer in the early 1970s and then was drawn away from
government contract research by the commercial promise of genetic
engineering -- is the archetypal Washington biotech firm. Many observers
say its fate is a portent of changes that may ripple through the region's
biotechnology community over the next few years.
Meloy is being moved to Pennsylvania so that its biotechnology expertise
can be meshed with Rorer Group's multimillion-dollar drug research
program. Virtually every major pharmaceutical company is making a
similar investment in biotechnology, as it has become increasingly clear
that genetic engineering will have a major impact on the way drugs are
developed.
The result is a new concentration of resources in the biotech field and
increased competition in key product areas, which some experts say could
force some of the many biotech start-ups into bankruptcy, limit others to
niche markets and push still more, like Meloy, into the arms of major
pharmaceutical houses.
"People have been talking for years about a shakeout in the biotech
industry," said L. Patrick Gage, vice president and director of exploratory
research for the Nutley, N.J.-based American arm of Hoffmann-La Roche
Inc., the Swiss drug giant. "I think it's finally coming."
Meloy had grown to $10 million in revenue from contract research by 1975
when it was acquired by Revlon Inc.'s drug division. That division, which
also included USV Pharmaceutical Corp. and Armour Pharmaceutical Co.,
was in turn bought by Rorer in January 1986.
At the time, Meloy was only a small portion of the deal, which was part of
Rorer's attempt to increase its pharmaceutical muscle. But later, when it
became clear that Rorer needed to build a base in biotechnology, its
management took a closer look at Meloy. "They'd brought in top-notch
scientists and were doing some exciting work," said Rorer Chairman
Robert E. Cawthorn. "We said, 'Boy, we've got a real gem here.' "
What attracted Rorer to Meloy was the same thing that has attracted many
of the major pharmaceutical companies to biotechnology -- expertise in the
use of recombinant DNA techniques to screen chemical compounds for
their potential as drugs.
In the past, new drugs were discovered by testing thousands of synthetic
compounds on living organisms, a process that, at best, yielded one
promising substance in 1,000. But by studying the chemical structures of
cells linked to particular medical problems, biotechnology has made it
possible to screen potential drugs far more effectively.
This process, known as receptor technology, allows scientists "to ask the
right biological questions," said Dr. Alain Schreiber, who is heading up the
integration of Meloy into Rorer. "Instead of using a shotgun approach, we
can use a pointed rifle."
Meloy has two scientists on its roster from the Wietzmann Institute in
Israel with international reputations in receptor work, and down the road
the Meloy team hopes to lead Rorer into a second potentially revolutionary
stage in drug development: allowing for the engineering of drugs to precise
biological specifications by giving scientists a precise understanding of the
nature of disease. Drug design, as it is known, promises to remove the
guesswork from drug development and to allow for the creation of stable,
targeted chemical compounds that are less prone to side effects.
"The dream of every chemist and every pharmaceutical house is to have
rational design of their drugs -- to have a scientist sit down and draw a
chemical compound on paper," Schreiber said.
In pursuit of this, Rorer has taken a drugdevelopment staff of about 100
scientists and supplemented it with an equivalent number of biologists
from the Meloy group. Many of the other major drug firms are doing the
same thing, looking to supplement the synthetic chemistry that has
dominated drug development so far with expertise in biotechnology.
"In a decade, bioscience will be the major driving force behind drug
development, and chemistry a tool," predicted Ralph Hardy, deputy
chairman of Boston's Biotechnica International Inc. "At the moment, it's
the opposite."
But drug companies are not simply turning themselves into biotech firms.
For example, as Smith Kline & French, the research division of
pharmaceutical giant SmithKline Beckman Corp., has hired about 200
biotech scientists in recent years the company's principal concern has been
integrating the skills of the newcomers with those of the chemists. "We
wanted molecular biologists to understand the existing world and wanted
the reverse osmosis among our traditional scientists so they could begin to
understand what molecular genetics was all about," said George Poste, the
company's vice president for research.
If biologists design drugs in the future, it will be in tandem with chemists,
who will construct the chemical compounds designed by the biologists.
Rorer felt it necessary to move Meloy Laboratories from Springfield to a
building adjacent to the company's research center in Fort Washington for
the same reason. Company officials say they want Meloy biologists to work
more closely with Rorer's chemists.
Of course, not every small biotech company is destined to be swallowed
whole by a giant like Rorer Group. But the enormous demands involved in
integrating traditional chemistry and biotechnology for drug development
in the next decade have made it less likely, according to industry experts,
that many smaller companies looking to produce drugs can survive.
Although some biotech firms, like California's Genentech Inc., appear to
have already made the leap from start-up to the pharmaceutical major
leagues, and other older firms, like California's Amgen and Boston's
Genetics Institute, have been touted as likely followers, analysts doubt
whether many other companies are capable of finding the capital to join
them.
"The time of the high market valuation for biotech companies is over,"
Schreiber said. "People have realized how difficult and expensive it is to
bring a new therapeutic to market. The hype is gone."
Among the rest of the hundreds of biotechnology companies in the health
care sector, there already seems to have developed a split between those
small firms struggling to compete with pharmaceutical companies
hundreds of times their size in the development of new drugs and biotech
firms thriving on much more modest niche markets in medical devices.
The division is especially marked in the Washington area, where the
majority of the most promising biotech health care firms -- such as Biotech
Research Laboratories Inc., one of the nation's principal manufacturers of
tests for acquired immune deficiency syndrome -- are in the business of
producing recombinant DNA diagnostic kits.
"There will always be a trend toward fewer players in the pharmaceutical
business because the costs of launching a product are so great. With
diagnostics, the costs of approval are less, and the demand for
differentiated products is much greater," said Leon Taub, president of
Digene, a College Park firm that has, among other things, developed a
DNA diagnostic test to supplement a pap smear.
"Diagnostics are a very different business," said Steve Turner, president of
Gaithersburg's Oncor Inc., another local company that has made a
successful entry into that market. "It's more like trench warfare. Products
evolve rapidly, and you have to make constant changes. That fits more into
themodus operandi of a smaller business."
For biotechnology firms in other parts of the health care market, the future
is less certain. And in the Washington area, where -- unlike the thriving
biotechnology communities in northern California and Boston -- there are
no clear giants emerging, some analysts say that further absorption of
small firms by large pharmaceutical companies is a distinct possibility.
"The ones that really have something are likely to be eaten up," said
Thomas Taylor, an analyst with Chesapeake Securities in Towson.
And the others? "I think many of them are just going to die."