Frequently Asked Questions & Email Responses

Why Are You Running At-Large Rather Than District 3?

There are a couple different factors that led to my decision to run At-Large . First and foremost being that the concerns I bear for our city are not relegated to any one particular district but truly city wide. Another reason being that those who are most familiar with me and my involvement with local government and my political theories are spread throughout the city and I felt that this would lend to my greatest chance at garnering the support needed to win. Lastly, but probably most importantly, I recognize the needs and the problems that the citizens of our city's south side face both in District 3 and District 4 and believe that they more than justify further representation and consideration of those districts from the dais. I promise to champion for them along with their district representatives, bolstering their efforts and helping bring greater attention to the needs of those communities and the region more generally. 

What are your top two priorities for the office and how will you address them if elected?

Public Safety and Affordable Housing are my two top priorities. I would prioritize public safety by increasing the funding for police and fire departments, working with community leaders to reduce crime, and supporting mental health and addiction resources. For affordable housing, I would work with community developers to restore existing infrastructure and utilities, focusing on revitalization projects with an emphasis on affordability and historic preservation. I would seek to slow urban sprawl and meter growth against natural resources and city services to ensure developments do not outpace renewable resources.

What is your opinion on increasing the salary for City Council Members? (NOTE: Current salary is $6,250)

I support increasing the salary for City Council Members, I believe that it would allow for greater diversity and inclusion on the dais. I believe that by increasing the salary, more individuals from diverse backgrounds who may not have the financial means to serve on the council would be able to do so. This would lead to a council that better reflects the community it serves and would allow for a wider range of perspectives and ideas to be heard and considered when making important decisions. Ultimately, I believe that a diverse and inclusive council is necessary for creating policies that benefit all members of the community.

How would you balance city growth and the water supply needed to sustain it as a Colorado Springs Utilities Board member?

I will balance growth with our natural resources, such as water, and our city services, such as police and fire. Revitalizing our existing service areas through infill development and working with industry experts to ensure responsible development that doesn't exceed our renewable resources.

What would you do to address the housing and homelessness issues, if anything?

As a City Council member, I would collaborate with community developers to repurpose current infrastructure and utilities, prioritizing affordable housing and historic preservation in restoration and renewal projects. To curb sprawl, I would require any new annexation proposals to include plans for one of these renewal projects.

What will you do to support a vibrant economy?

I believe in creating an environment that attracts and supports businesses of all sizes. This includes investing in infrastructure, supporting workforce development programs, and streamlining regulations to make it easier for businesses to operate.

What will you do to address environmental issues such as drought, wildfires and air quality, if anything?

I am committed to protecting public lands and open spaces, including parks and trails, which are critical to Colorado Springs' environment and quality of life. As a Colorado Springs Utilities Board member, I would prioritize sustainable and responsible water management to help mitigate drought and wildfire risks. I would also support expanding the use of renewable energy sources to reduce pollution and improve air quality. Additionally, I would advocate for responsible development that considers environmental impacts and promotes green infrastructure.

CITIZEN'S PROJECT SURVEY

General:

1. What are the top two issues facing Colorado Springs and what are your plans to address them? (150 Words)

The top two issues facing Colorado Springs are undoubtedly affordable housing and public safety. As a City Council candidate, my plan to address the affordable housing crisis includes working with community developers to focus on restoration and renewal projects with an emphasis on affordable housing and historic preservation. I would also make consideration of new annexations contingent on agreement to one of these projects to slow continual sprawl.

Regarding public safety, I would work to increase community policing efforts and support programs that address the root causes of crime, such as mental health and addiction. I would also prioritize funding for essential public safety services, such as police and fire departments. I believe that by addressing these issues, we can make Colorado Springs a safer and more affordable place to live for all residents.

Transparency:

2. How would you engage citizens from underrepresented or disengaged communities and

increase the public’s access to government information and decision-making? (100 Words)

I would prioritize community engagement by hosting town hall meetings and other events to give citizens a chance to ask questions and share their concerns. I would also establish an open-door policy, making myself available to constituents and seeking input on issues. I would also work to increase access to information by advocating for more user-friendly city websites and ensure our meetings are available to view on all streaming devices. I believe that by actively engaging with the community and prioritizing transparency, we can help increase public trust in local government and improve decision-making for all residents of Colorado Springs.

Houselessness:

3. Over the last 8 months, there have been 87 deaths in the houseless community, what can the

City of Colorado Springs do to further address houselessness and the resulting deaths? (150

Words)

The issue of homelessness in Colorado Springs is a serious one and it requires a multifaceted approach, including increasing access to affordable housing, mental health and substance abuse services, job training, and supportive services. Emergency shelter during extreme weather conditions and outreach efforts for medical care and harm reduction resources are also essential. It is also important for us to differentiate between those experiencing houselessness and the chronically homeless in order to provide targeted solutions. Collaborative efforts across government, business, and nonprofit organizations are necessary for long-term solutions. As a council candidate, I am committed to working with community partners to develop and implement evidence-based solutions to address the root causes of homelessness and prevent future deaths among those experiencing houselessness.

Transit:

4. With the rapid growth we are experiencing, how can the City of Colorado Springs expand and

improve the efficiency of our public transportation? (100 Words)

I would like us to consider building a bus station on the north side of the city with substations in between and possibly a light rail connecting the two halves. As well as, increasing the frequency of buses and expanding routes to cover underserved areas. Increasing our city's walkability and expanding our bike-share programs should also be a priority. Finally, implementing technology solutions such as better real-time bus tracking would improve efficiency and convenience for riders.

Growth/Development:

5. How will you ensure that economic growth and development will be equitably distributed,

especially as it pertains to the southeast, while also maintaining and improving access to

affordable housing? (150 Words)

I will prioritize equitable development by working with community leaders and stakeholders to ensure that investment and opportunities are distributed evenly across all neighborhoods, including the southeast. I will work to promote policies that prioritize affordable housing and incentivize developers to include affordable units in their projects. Additionally, I will push for the expansion of public transit in underserved areas to connect residents with job opportunities and resources. To ensure transparency and community engagement, I will hold regular town hall meetings and establish community advisory boards to provide input on economic development and affordable housing initiatives. I believe that every resident of Colorado Springs deserves access to safe, affordable housing and equitable economic opportunities, and I am committed to working towards this goal.

Diversity:

6. How should the City Council ensure that Colorado Springs best serves the interests of an

increasingly diverse population, considering all protected classes? (100 Words)

By actively seeking out and listening to the voices of underrepresented communities. We can start by creating and participating in forums that specifically engage and prioritize input from diverse groups, as well as conducting community surveys to better understand the needs and priorities of these communities. We should work to promote diversity and inclusion within all levels of city government, including hiring practices and creating opportunities for professional development and leadership roles. Lastly, I would say should ensure that policies and programs are designed with equity in mind and are evaluated regularly to ensure that they are effectively meeting the needs of all protected classes.

Separation of Church and State:

7. What can be done to ensure that personal religious preferences do not interfere with

government functions? (150 Words)

As a council member, I would uphold the separation of church and state and ensure that all government functions are conducted in a neutral and non-discriminatory manner. I would advocate for policies that prohibit discrimination based on religion and work towards creating a culture of respect and inclusivity within the government. I would also support efforts to educate government officials on the importance of religious neutrality and how it pertains to their duties.  Finally, I would work with community organizations and leaders to ensure that the voices of all residents, including those of different faiths and beliefs, are heard and represented in the decision-making process.

Arts:

8. What are the most important ways that you would support the creative industries and cultural

life in our city over the next 5 years? (100 Words)

I would prioritize our city's creative industries and cultural life by supporting policies that foster local artists and organizations. I'll advocate for increased funding for public art and events, partner with businesses to create more artist opportunities, and promote our cultural assets to attract tourism. I'll also ensure our zoning and regulations support creative industries and preserve historic landmarks. Lastly, I'll prioritize diversity and inclusivity in cultural programming to represent and value all members of our community.

Pikes Peak Outdoor Recreation Alliance Questionnaire

1. Mayor Suthers often closes his remarks by challenging citizens to continue to “build a

city that matches our scenery, a shining city at the foot of a great mountain.” Our city’s

history is closely tied to the outdoors and its future should also be viewed as intrinsically

linked to our amazing natural beauty and recreational opportunities. One program that

has been instrumental in acquiring and maintaining these spaces is the Trails, Open

Space and Parks (TOPS) Program. This program is coming up for renewal and will be the

one issue on the April ballot. Although our tax rate is significantly lower than most other

comparable communities, the increase did not pass during the last election so only an

extension of 20 years with a few changes in use are included in the ballot language this

time.

How do you view the TOPS program, are you in support of the extension for 20 years,

and would you support a future increase to the sales tax from the current one cent on

$10?

I strongly support the extension of the TOPS Program. Our city's natural beauty and

recreational opportunities are integral to our community, and the TOPS program has

been instrumental in acquiring and maintaining these spaces. I believe that preserving

our natural resources is critical to maintaining a high quality of life for our residents and

visitors alike. While I understand the concern about increasing taxes, the current tax

rate is significantly lower than most other comparable communities, and I believe that

investing in the TOPS program is well worth the cost. I would definitely support a future

increase in the sales tax if it meant preserving and enhancing our city's beautiful parks,

trails, and open spaces.

2. The outdoor recreation industry brings significant economic impact to communities,

including Colorado Springs. In the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) 2022 Report, the

economic output of outdoor recreation was calculated at $862 billion, contributing

more to the U.S. economy than oil and gas extraction, mining, and agriculture. In

Colorado, the industry contributes $11.6 billion to the state’s GDP. Here in Colorado

Springs, our local industry is made up of manufacturers, retailers, guides and outfitters,

outdoor educators, advocacy groups, land managers, and so much more. It is composed

of and built by small businesses, both for profit companies and nonprofit organizations.

What do you see as the role of the outdoor industry in the future of Colorado Springs’

economy and how would you support these businesses and their workforce?

The outdoor recreation industry has proven to be a vital part of Colorado Springs’

economy and its future potential cannot be overstated. The industry not only creates

jobs and generates revenue but also contributes to the unique character of our city. As

our community continues to grow, it is important that we support the outdoor industry

and its workforce. One way to do this is by providing resources and incentives for

businesses to expand and innovate. We should also prioritize the protection and

preservation of our natural spaces to ensure that they remain accessible to all and can

continue to serve as a draw for visitors and residents alike. Additionally, promoting

outdoor education and engagement can help foster a culture of appreciation for the

outdoors, which can in turn support the growth of the industry. Generally, investing in

the outdoor industry is investing in the future of Colorado Springs.

3. Our local outdoor recreation opportunities and natural wonders draw people from all

across the world and bring essential tourism dollars to Colorado Springs. The 2021

Longwoods report showed that 14% of all overnight visitors’ main purpose of their trip

was to enjoy the outdoors, making it the 3rd most popular reason (after visiting friends

or family and touring, some of which likely encompassed the outdoors). Of all overnight

visitors, 66% of them enjoyed outdoor activities during their stay and it was the #1

activity for all visitors - more than entertainment, cultural activities, sporting activities,

and business activities.

The Lodging and Automobile Rental Tax (LART) is almost completely funded by tourists.

In fact, if residents don’t stay overnight in a local hotel or rent a car in the city, they are

not taxed at all! The fund and at the end of 2022 raised $9.8 million for the established

purpose “to attract visitors and to enhance the economy of the City and the Pikes Peak

Region.” Share your thoughts on the LART tax – increasing it, its oversight, creating a

“set aside” for stewardship of outdoor spaces heavily impacted by tourists, etc.

I believe that increasing the LART tax with greater oversight and creating earmarked

funds for stewardship of outdoor may be the most equitable means for both residents

and tourists. As the outdoor recreation opportunities and natural wonders are one of

the main reasons for people to visit Colorado Springs, it is only fair that tourists

contribute to the maintenance and preservation of the natural spaces that they enjoy

and impact. The LART tax, which is almost completely funded by tourists, can be used to

support the local economy and attract visitors, but also to fund the preservation of

natural spaces. With proper oversight, this tax increase can be implemented fairly and

effectively, benefitting both residents and tourists alike.

4. Colorado Springs has a unique relationship with the forest and foothills, with our WUI

(Wildland Urban Interface) encompassing a significant border of our community. The

issues in our city easily move into the forest and those of the forest can move into our

community. This “border” is not recognized by wildfire or wildlife coming into the city or

homeless who camp or people engage in illegal activity in the forest. Some Colorado

cities have found creative ways to address these issues, including hiring additional

rangers to supplement the Forest Service. Please share your thoughts on these issues

and solutions you would support.

As a resident of Colorado Springs, I recognize the unique challenges presented by our

WUI and the need for innovative solutions to address these issues. I am willing to

investigate and support potential solutions such as hiring additional rangers to help

supplement the efforts of the Forest Service. It is important to recognize that these

issues are not limited to wildfires and wildlife, but also include illegal activities and

homelessness, which can impact both the forest and the community. As a community,

we must work together to find sustainable solutions that balance the preservation of

our natural spaces with the safety and wellbeing of our residents.

Faith Table Candidate Questionnaire 

Why are you running for city council?

I am running for city council because I believe in the power of community and the need for diverse representation in local government. I am committed to addressing issues related to public safety, affordable housing, and economic development, and I want to use my experience as a community organizer and advocate to make positive change for the people of Colorado Springs.

What are three things you hope to achieve on city council if you are elected?

1.Increase transparency and accountability in the city government by bridging the gap between the council and the community.

2.Address the issues of affordable housing and homelessness by working with developers and non-profits to create sustainable and affordable housing options.

3.Prioritize the protection and preservation of natural resources, including parks and open spaces, while balancing the needs of growth and development in the city.

Water  - What is your view of the City’s role and that of the Public Utilities Board in preserving water resources and ensuring that growth will be possible with enough water to sustain our community? 

I believe the City and Public Utilities Board must balance growth with water resources to ensure a sustainable community. I plan to work collaboratively with experts in the field to make informed decisions that prioritize responsible water use and conservation.

Housing -  HB23-1115 is the bill in the Colorado legislature to lift the judicial ban on local control of rents.  If it passes, what rent stabilization policies would you support?

Rent control legislation can have unintended consequences such as reduced housing availability and quality due to decreased incentives for developers and landlords to invest in new properties or maintain existing ones. On the other hand, just cause eviction legislation provides much-needed protections for renters, preventing landlords from evicting tenants without a legitimate reason, thereby promoting stability and security in the rental market.

Housing – What is your position on just cause eviction legislation as it relates to Colorado Springs?  What will you do to increase protections to renting residents against unjust eviction?

As a City Council candidate, I support the concept of Just Cause Eviction legislation in Colorado Springs. If elected, I plan to work towards implementing such legislation and increasing protections for renters to ensure they are not unjustly evicted. I believe that everyone should have a safe and stable place to call home.

Housing -  Many areas of our city are undergoing revitalization, which both brings new opportunities and also threatens the homes and lives of poorer residents.  How should the city handle resident displacement in areas like the Mill St. neighborhood?

I believe that community involvement is essential in managing revitalization projects. I would advocate for resident representation in planning and decision-making, ensuring that the needs of current residents are met. To address displacement concerns, I would prioritize the creation of affordable housing options in revitalized areas and provide resources and support to those who may be at risk of displacement.

Housing - The community at highest risk of experiencing homelessness are those earning 0-30% of the area median income (AMI).  What will you do to prioritize the creation of affordable housing for those earning 0-30% AMI in Colorado Springs?

I plan to address the issue of affordable housing by working with community developers to prioritize affordable housing and historic preservation projects, focusing on infill and revitalization of existing service areas. I also plan to slow down the continual sprawl by making consideration of new annexations contingent on agreement to one of these projects.

Public Safety - There’s been a lot of talk about criminal justice reform. What kinds of specific reforms do you see are needed in Colorado Springs? And if you’re the incumbent, what local policing reforms have you supported here in Colorado Springs?  

I would support evidence-based criminal justice reforms such as more pre-trial diversion programs, increased funding for mental health and addiction treatment, and ending cash bail. I would also support community policing and hiring more diverse officers.

Health Care - What do you see as the appropriate role of the City of Colorado Springs in meeting the health care needs of all residents? What has been your experience in dealing with the barriers to health care for people in Colorado Springs?

As an advocate for public health, I believe that the City should prioritize access to affordable healthcare for all residents. I recognizes the barriers to healthcare that many people in Colorado Springs face, and I am committed to working with healthcare providers and community organizations to address these issues and advocating for policies that expand access to healthcare and address the root causes of health disparities in the community.

UCCS Questionnaire

The City Council recently passed an ordinance that would put limitations on future

annexations of land for development based on Colorado Springs Utilities’ (CSU)

capacity to supply water. One of the critical points of this ordinance is setting CSU’s

ability to deliver 130% of current demand as a prerequisite for future annexations.

Q: Do you believe 130% is an appropriate threshold to set?

A: This is a hard one for a number of factors. First, I do not support any measures that may lead to the creation of a de facto monopoly. It is my understanding that 130% is considered too strenuous by most in the industry and left only one qualifying consortium. I do recognize water as a real and present concern and that we have a duty to both our neighbors in the region and down the waterways as well as future generations to meter our growth responsibly. I trust our experts in the utilities department and their recommendations, however, as several current council members requested, I would have liked to see how the 130% was determined as the appropriate number, and without seeing the results of that request the number does strike somewhat arbitrary. If the number is arbitrary that would make the measures appear more politically motivated rather than of viability.  A "wolf in sheep's clothing" as it were. While not opposed to 130%, if determined necessary, I did agree with the compromise of 128% first adopted by council and felt that more research was warranted to decide what is both responsible and equitable. While I feel that water is a pressing subject with profound impacts that needs to be addressed sooner rather than later I did not see it as something so imminent that more time and resources could not be afforded the matter.

Q: How do you balance the need to conserve water and create a buffer for capacity with the need to provide housing to meet the City’s current 12k unit shortfall?

A: Exactly why greater time and consideration should be given the matter. However, I believe one avenue that needs to be emphasized more fully is infill over expansion. By utilizing and revitalizing existing infrastructure already in existence and in need of repair we limit waste reduction and coverage area with improved efficiency. Rather than continuing to entice only new residents from outside the region we should focus on creating truly attainable, affordable, and efficient housing for the current underserved residents. That isn't to say that I don't want those who might want to move here to have the opportunity or that I do not want all to feel welcome but we must do more to slow the sprawl and address the current needs of the citizens before expanding our services. Especially our notoriously underserved including the elderly and military veterans.

Q: The City funds several programs through sales tax including TOPS (Trails Open

Space and Parks) and PPRTA (Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority).

    a. Do you believe that sales tax is an appropriate mechanism to fund these

        programs?

While I feel that too often we are are heavily sales tax dependent in this city due to the misperceptions surrounding metro districts and how they are mudding the waters around property tax. In this particular situation I do believe that sales tax is the appropriate mechanism. Our parks and open spaces are the crown jewel of the city and a major attraction to the region enjoyed by patrons from across the country and around the globe. Sales tax is actually the most equitable way to assure the contributions of both resident and tourist proportionate to their duration and in as much as they utilize the city.

       b. Do you think current tax rates are sufficient or should they be changed? 

Unfortunately, no I do not believe it to be sufficient. I know that TOPS is in need of even greater funding. 

Without proper TOPS funding we are greater risk of private entities purchasing our open spaces as we have seen in the recent past with examples like the Broadmoor's acquisition of Strawberry Fields.  Along with rising costs and inflation comes a need to evaluate the sales tax rate in order to cover the rising overhead in our public works departments.

Q: Please describe what in your opinion constitutes a thorough and engaging

stakeholder (including people on different sides of an issue) process?

A: Continued civic polling and robust public comment. Open forums and ample notification. Easily accessible data.

a. In your opinion is the City Council offering an appropriate level of

engagement with stakeholders?

A: I know that the city likes to tout that they achieve greater public engagement than many other comparable municipalities but I hear many citizens say, as I have felt myself, that they are unapprised by the city on matters that directly affect their neighborhoods.  I know that some members of the city say that it is the citizen that does not do enough to stay apprised. If elected, I look forward to examining this issues from the opposite side to see where the breakdown truly exists.

Q: What are the top three critical issues facing the City in your opinion?

Answer:

1. Public Safety

2. Affordable/Attainable Housing

3. Homelessness (Shelter/ Mental Health Services)

Q: Our region is on the edge of federal air quality standards set by EPA for ground-level

ozone, a pollutant that is harmful to children and elderly residents.  Much of the ozone

pollution that comes into our region is generated by sources that are out of our control. 

However, a large share of regionally-generated ozone pollutants come from

transportation emissions.  As Mayor/City Council, what strategies would you pursue, if

any, to try to keep us out of a costly, long-term nonattainment designation by EPA?

A: Unfortunately, much of it is out of our control but that does not render our responsibility moot. We must take more accountability for our contributions to the air quality. We must examine our emissions standards and do more to promote environmentally friendly options through facilitation. This means more charging stations for EVs and better public transportation options. We can start by installing more EV charging stations across the city. This both sets a precedent both locally and in a region and has a duel benefit to the city as we are the power provider in the region but the city has not (as of yet) entered into the petroleum business. Lowering emissions while generating revenue. Greater consideration should be made on public and multi-modal transportation as well including bicycles and rideshare options. Our public transportation fleet should be examined for efficiency and emissions and rather than continuing to stretch the service area through further and further development would examine whether increased frequency of our current bus routes might make public transportation a more viable option and therefore ultimately reduce the number of cars contributing to emissions. Once we have done our due diligence I think we are a better vantage point to hold others accountable.

a. How do you believe public and private transportation in Colorado Springs

can be improved?

I may have already answered that with the previous question above but I think that currently in this city public transportation is not viewed by most as viable due to its inefficiency. 

Q: With the severe shortage in police recruitment and retention within CSPD, what

do you see as the causes that create this shortfall and what remedies would you

be open to exploring?

A: I think nationally the position of law-enforcement officer has lost its mystique and maybe rightfully so. In recent times the police have come to be regarded less as peace keepers and protectors of the community but the enforcers of totalitarian rule and unjust laws. The cinematic portrayal of a cop playing by his own rules and cleaning up the streets at any cost is now seen for what it is, criminal acts conducted with impunity. Locally I feel we are fortunate to have the law-enforcement personnel that do and believe we have one of the best communities to be a law-enforcement officer in. That being said I think we need to examine the rate of pay for our emergency responders and contrast it against the rate of pay in comparable municipalities along with cost of living. We need to create more ancillary divisions with specified purview and set authorities in order to allow our officers to focus on major crime.  And lastly we need to make sure our law-enforcement officers are equipped with the tools and technology necessary not only to excel in their duties but to ensure accountability.

Q: What policies and solutions are you open to exploring to address the growing homelessness issue in Colorado Springs?

A: I want to seek developer based solutions to affordable and attainable housing but much greater emphasis needs to be given to mental health services for those experiencing houselessness.  Even for those with no history of mental illness the trauma of the loss of home and shelter alone can be traumatic and disabling. Further complicating a persons ability to recover and reestablish themselves.  The feeling that others are apathetic to your condition is often the biggest deterrent to success. I would like to see more resources for temporary shelter and skills training but especially mental health services extend to the full breath of the city rather than relegated to just one region.

Q: What issues would you recuse yourself due to personal conflicts?

A: While I am currently not in the industry I have had past success in legalized cannabis and would consider returning to the industry in the future. Depending on the measure being presented and future impacts that it would have on the city and the cannabis industry I may feel it ethically prudent and morally necessary to recuse myself in certain situations.

Q: Why should we elect you?

A: I am often asked why people should vote for me and my answer is typically that I am not entirely sure you should, that is a choice best left to the individual. What I am certain of is that you must elect representation that you feel best reflects you with the greatest capability of crafting policy and make decisions with you in mind. I would certainly like to think that's me. I consider myself a common person with slightly above common sense and capabilities. Possessing a high level of empathy and reasoning. I am a solution seeker by nature. I do more than listen, I hear, and that is an important distinction. I have a way of communicating the ramifications of situations and decisions in a way that allows most to comprehend more fully. I am a strong proponent for communication and transparency. 

And I am different. If there is one thing my time with council these last 10 years have taught me is that we are in desperate need of something different. 

Integrity Matters Questionnaire 

1.  The Broadmoor Land Swap was a 2016 land trade including historic parkland, Strawberry Fields, passed by a vote of the people in 1885 to be a part of North Cheyenne Canon park.  The controversial land swap garnered national media attention even added to university classes across the nation.  Did you support the Broadmoor Land Swap and why? *

Yes

No

1a.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

Well for one I have pointed out time and again the council's hypocrisy on this matter when afterwards they have continually cited the need to adhere to the city charter when the charter expressly forbids such a land swap. I was a vocal opponent and find it funny that they made a number of arguments in favor of the swap to include the parks budget and their inability to adequately maintain the space but subsequently have continually touted the fine stewardship of the TOPS program and have repeatedly pushed for greater funds for acquisitions, of which I am in favor, but why is it then that TOPS did not receive first right of refusal for this parcel? The issues and motivations were glaring from the beginning and I was fervently opposed.

2.  In 2021, the City Council passed an ordinance, Parkland Development Ordinance (PLDO) that allows developers to reduce the number of acres required to develop for parkland for neighborhood developments (7.5 to 5.5 acres) and pay in lieu of developing any parks for neighborhoods they develop.  Did you support this decision? *

Yes

No

2a.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

3.  Under the Suthers Administration, Boulder and Denver have added a $10 million Google campus as well as Twitter, Facebook, Apple and a bevy of robotics start-ups.  We have added burger joint after burger joint, a failed Olympic museum the taxpayers are paying millions to keep afloat and manufacturing and tourism jobs driving us off a tourism cliff and creating a Minimum Wage Mecca.  We have a narrow tourism and retail tax base which drives up the amount each individual has to pay in taxes to attain our goals.  Do you agree with this leadership direction?   *

Yes

No

3a.  What should we do to diversify our tax base?

I have not been happy with the direction the city has been moving towards for some time now nor have I appreciated all of the actions of our current administrations. I find that there are many examples were they are clearly taking advantage of the distracted and heavily burden populace and use that distraction to accomplish goals that only serve to heap additional weight onto the shoulders of that same absorbed population and further tighten the blinders of public perception as to force us into being bystanders as they move forward crafting the city as they feel is best for us and regardless of the will of its citizens. Meanwhile we just struggle to maintain our lives. This is not a misfortune, it is a mechanism, a means by which to maintain control over the direction we move in as a city and whether by design or adventitious, it has been built. The time has come now for us to dismantle it and rebuild together to ensure the city remains viable and equitable for all its citizens now and well into the future. We must own our city or resign to let someone else own it.

4.  Westside Watch united neighborhoods across the city concerned about fire evacuation.  2010 was our last evacuation modeling study.  Westside Watch spent a year bringing in experts to show our leadership that we have life-threatening conditions due to rapid growth that exceeds our infrastructure and presented the Clearance Evacuation Time & Public Safety Ordinance which mandates the City do evacuation modeling, reports the times and maps (like what Mill Valley and others do) to residents and visitors and established standards for development.  The City ignored this and passed an ordinance that does nothing to address these problems.  Do you support evacuation modeling, reporting of times/maps to the public and establishing evacuation standards for development? *

Yes

No

4a.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

I absolutely support evacuation modeling and more. We should identify the neighborhoods and regions with the highest danger and begin establishing advisory boards consisting of community members and emergency service personnel as well as experts in the field to determine comprehensive evacuation plans for each community. Prioritizing locations by greatest danger and starting at the fringes while working our way towards the center.

5.  The vast majority of cities and towns in Colorado fully fund their parks systems from their General Fund (i.e. no additional tax). In Colorado Springs, the General Fund falls short, to the extent that the city has twice turned to the TOPS tax - unquestionably designed solely for the acquisition and preservation of Open Space - for relief in backlogged maintenance of parks. Do you agree that our pattern of parks funding should be redesigned such that it falls in line with that of our sister cities across Colorado? *

Yes

No

5a.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

Clearly the dysfunction is inherent in our current system. We move funds allocated in one area to cover the errors of policies in another. Our utter lack of transparency as a city combined with the mandates of TABOR have culminated in the confounded rejection of much needed tax resources by the voter time and again. Essentially shooting ourselves in the foot. Not because we do not all want good things for our city but we are confused by exactly how much of the money collected from us annually goes to the city and how much is returned to the developers in the form of mill levies and alike. We see the requests and the departments as redundant and we start to question if we are being swindled in some sort of shell game. We have lost the taxpayers trust because we have refused to include them. We regard them as if they are uninterested and incapable when in truth they are uninvited and ill-informed.

6.  Trails and Open Space are what brings people to Colorado Springs both to visit and live.  During the Suthers Administration, our ranking in Trust For Public Lands who rates cities on parks, has plummeted to 58th.  The TOPS Tax is supposed to be used to acquire and protect Open Spaces.  However, because of financial mismanagement, our city continues to pilfer those funds for municipal park maintenance.  The new TOPS tax leaves voters with the impression that 75 cents of every dollar taxed will go to acquiring Open Space when it's really only 40.9 cents of every dollar.  The majority of every tax dollar levied is going to administration, municipal park maintenance, and trails.  Further, because it is a municipal ordinance instead of a charter change, the promised controls can be changed administratively. It is, in fact, why a charter change was used as leverage to try and pass the recent Water Ordinance.  Integrity Matters believes that, at a minimum the language should reflect the truth.  Do you support the new TOPS tax? *

Yes

No

6a.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

This is a difficult one to answer as I do support TOPS in as much as it is our only mechanism at this time, and as you have pointed out, the General Fund falls short of what we need to preserve the crown jewel of our region which is our parks and open spaces. However, I would look forward with eager anticipation to examining things from the other side of the dais in order to see how we bring ourselves into alignment with our neighboring municipalities throughout the state.

7.  City Council recently passed ReToolCOS substantially changing our land use code which allows for "Flex Zoning" and dramatically limits the ability for citizens to appeal requiring they live within 1,000 feet to 3 linear miles and gain "Privileged Standing", a term coined by Councilmember Wayne Williams, requiring residents in the 1,000 feet to 3 mile distance, to speak at a meeting/write an email or letter to gain "Privileged Standing" to Appeal a development.  Do you agree with the restrictions placed on citizens' ability to appeal? *

Yes

No

7a.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

If I could respond here with a blank-stare emoji that would be my preference.

7b.  Do you support "Flex Zoning"? *

Yes

No

7b.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

Not in the manner it is crafted. I am for diverse neighborhoods, however, under its current structure I see where it might lead to those experiencing hardship to utilize their properties to establish ancillary dwelling units as a revenue generator in a poor attempt to handle the attainable housing crisis and resulting in portions of our city turning these properties into a sort of impoverished tenement complex further tarnishing the luster of some of our most historic neighborhoods when we should be more focused on renewal and revitalization. I would like to see where this form of flex zoning could be revised to avoid such an evolution.

7c.  When these conflicts arise, whose voice should prevail, the City or the Citizens? *

The City's Voice

The Citizens Voice

7c.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

The citizen always, but the city should be more diligent at apprising the public of the issues and the ramifications so the citizen can make a more informed decision.

8.  It's no secret that the developers, the HBA PAC and Dark Money groups like Colorado Springs Forward who was recently fined $1,000 by the Secretary of State for prohibited donations of $10,000 to Commissioners & Candidates Holly Williams and Cami Bremer, pour money into elections.  Of note, Colorado Springs Forward told the Secretary of State that one of the reasons for these prohibited donations was that they should have closed Colorado Springs Forward.  Google seems to think this is true as well unless, of course, they are donating gigantic sums to Councilmember Wayne Williams who just received an historic donation of $250,000 from developer-backed Colorado Springs Forward who, along with the Downtown Development Group as well as CSU and other important organizations now office in the Norwood building at 111 or 121 S. Tejon St. Do you support campaign finance limits? *

Yes

No

8a.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

As a citizen I find money to be an aversion to my vote. I often think back to a line from the classic Richard Pryor film from the 80's, Brewster's Millions, when in a news interview he says this to a reporter about the candidates running for Mayor of New York,

"Why would anyone spend 10 million dollars to get a job that pays $60,000 a year unless they plan to steal it back with interest?".

And from childhood this has stuck with me. The same can be said of campaign donations. Sure the money might not be theirs but we should also ask ourselves why would these large corporations and entities donate such significant sums to a candidate's campaign unless they were confident that their placement would benefit the bottom line. Corporations do not have a history of giving away money, as it tends to upset their investors, but they are known for making sound investments. Somewhere along the way a system intended for transparency and disclosure became a system of merit-badges and endorsements. With the results being; he with the largest pile of cash wins the seat. But the fault lies with us the people because we allow it to work, they purchase our vote and no matter how much they spent, they obtained it too cheap.

8b.  Do you support publicly funded elections where each candidate gets the same amount and no outside donations are allowed? *

Yes

No

8b.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

I am sorry but I am not sure how to answer this one affirmatively. Conceptually it sounds great and equitable but I would have to look over the finer details and examine any precedence before saying whether I was in favor. 

9.  The controversial Water Ordinance was passed, essentially as Norwood and the City created it, in a lickety-split 3 months, based upon murky prognostications and no thoughtful scientific process which includes the most important stakeholders and current ratepayers, the public, while the Clearance Evacuation Time-Public & Life Safety Ordinance that protects human lives was ignored after a year of meetings with world experts and our nation's top fire personnel endorsing it.  Do you support the Water Ordinance that protects water resources for a single developer? *

Yes

No

9.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

First, I do not support any measures that may lead to the creation of a de facto monopoly. It is my understanding that 130% is considered too strenuous by most in the industry and left only one qualifying consortium. I do recognize water as a real and present concern and that we have a duty to both our neighbors in the region and down the waterways as well as future generations to meter our growth responsibly. I trust our experts in the utilities department and their recommendations, however, as several current council members requested, I would have liked to see how the 130% was determined as the appropriate number, and without seeing the results of that request the number does strike somewhat arbitrary. If the number is arbitrary that would make the measures appear more politically motivated.  A "wolf in sheep's clothing" as it were. While not opposed to 130%, if illustrated necessary, I did agree with the compromise of 128% first adopted by council with the firm belief that it can be amended or removed by future councils. I feel that more research is warranted and I did not see it as something so imminent that more time and resources could not be afforded the matter.

I also foresee complications arising from having city policies that are not in concert with those of the county.

9b.  In his sales pitch for the Water Ordinance, Mayor Suthers tried to separate the rapid development of apartment infill from the annexation Water Ordinance. The Gazette reported Suthers would be adding 9,000 residences between May 2022 and April 2023 in a development tsunami.  Should these water limitations be applied to the  current development infill in the current city limits? *

Yes

No

9b.  You may provide additional explanation to the question above here:

 No, infill should be our focus right now, updating and revitalizing our existing infrastructure and utilities hookups for efficiency and to save money while promoting affordable and attainable dwellings for our citizens. Slowing the sprawl and focusing on renewal but creating monopolies on new annexations is not the mode for accomplishing this.

Pikes Peak Women Questionnaire

1.       What are your top five priorities  for the city budget?

My top five priorities for the city budget would be

1. Public Safety (Personnel/Equipment)

2. Mental Health

3. Parks and Open Spaces

4. Public Transportation

5. Homeless Intervention and Ancillary Services 

2.       What is your stance in the public discussion of the availability of water and restraints on developments that would try to create a “monopoly” or restraint of use of water in surrounding developments? How would your leadership create a group of citizens of varied backgrounds to make recommendations about our present and future needs of water for at least a century?

An adequate water supply is a real concern and I recognize the responsibility we have not only to  the current and future residents of our city but to our neighbors in the surrounding region and down the waterways as well but I, like many currently on the council, wanted to see how they came to the 130% determination.  I know that many of the council members requested this information but I have not seen it as of yet. Without seeing how they came to this determination it's hard to say for certain that I agree with it. I did agree with the 128% compromise decided on by council but still would like to see greater information. I am strongly opposed to any measure that might create a de facto monopoly on new developments unless it were completely necessary. However my real great concern with this matter is how we can act out of concert with the county. It seems like many complications would arise if we did not have a uniform policy in place and that we would be pushing development further and further out.  

And when you talk about a group of citizens with varied backgrounds considering the needs of the citizens far into the future, well that sounds a lot like the intended purpose of the council itself doesn't it? Isn't it a shame that we are so diverged from the original intent of our council that we discuss forming boards of citizens to advise our board of citizens as to the needs of our citizens?

3.       Would you support a charter change to allow pay for City Council Members? ( For comparison purposes, the salary of the Mayor of Colorado Springs in 2022 was approx. $160,000; the current city Council members make approx. $6,000;  County Commissioner’s salary is  approx.  $125,000)

Not only would I support this, I am strongly advocating for it as I have for many years now.  I desire a more inclusive council derived from and reflective of the general population and its wide array of economic and social diversity. I often said that we need more school teachers, grocery store clerks, nurses, and mechanics on our dais just to name some examples. And not retired members of those professions but current members of the working class, but no one I know with the burden of a mortgage, car payments, or raising children can afford to put their career on hold for four years to represent their communities on council with its current salary structure and it is clear that we all suffer the more for it. 

4.       What would you do to address the quality of life issues that residents are bringing to Council because of:   unrestrained/unregulated growth; the availability of lower-cost housing in places that have access to public transportation; the affordability crisis (rising costs of housing, childcare, healthcare, and more) and its impact on wage-earners and families); panhandlers at busy intersections; and the lack of beautification/landscaping and vegetation in new developments?

I believe that the revitalization of our existing infrastructure and renewal of our historic neighborhoods would solve many of the problems we see in our city today. There needs to be robust public discussion on how best to bring our communities up to date while preserving what is most prized by the residents with a strong emphasis on historic preservation. We must seek developer based solutions for attainable and affordable housing using our negotiating power through utilities and at the dais to incentivize renewal projects and making new annexation considerations contingent on coupling it with qualifying infill projects. This will go a long way towards slowing the sprawl and the continual stretching of city services and resources.

5.       Because City Council and County Commissioners are in charge of overseeing Pikes Peak Library District, how would you prevent the banning of books or types of learning or restricting public access in any way to information?

I do not believe in the banning of any books or information, I only oppose their misuse when applicable. You can count on my voice and vote to be in opposition.

Downtown Partnership Candidate Questionnaire

Why is a thriving Downtown important for the economic future of our entire city? 

A thriving Downtown is crucial for the city's economic future. A bustling Downtown attracts businesses, investors, and visitors, creating job opportunities, increasing tax revenues, and funding public services and infrastructure projects. The Downtown is home to numerous tourist attractions that draw visitors to the city, providing a boost to the local economy. A vibrant Downtown enhances the quality of life for residents, offering cultural events, entertainment, restaurants, and shopping options that create a sense of community and pride. The Downtown also increases property values, benefiting homeowners and businesses and generating more tax revenues for the city. Overall, a thriving Downtown is important for the economic growth, tourism, social cohesion, property values, and tax revenues that contribute to the economic future of Colorado Springs.

What role(s) are appropriate for the City to play in addressing our housing shortage, and what tools/methods do you support to increase the stock of affordable and attainable housing?

We must focus our efforts on infill utilizing our existing infrastructure to both update and be more cost efficient. We must work with our community development partners to meter our growth responsibly. Balancing annexations with revitalization and measuring development against our resources such as water but also our personnel such as police and fire.

Would you support efforts to increase City Council pay to a reasonable living wage in order to increase opportunities for people of all ages and backgrounds to serve?

Yes, I would be very supportive and have strongly advocated for an increase in council salary for the purpose of greater inclusion. 

As the Drake Power Plant is decommissioned, what factors are important for consideration of future use of the site (assuming environmental conditions are compatible)? Why is this site important?

As we move away from fossil fuels and towards more sustainable and renewable energy we also increase our costs. It may be necessary to consider how we increase our storage capabilities in order to increase our purchasing power on a national market as well as take advantage when prices are low.

If elected, what is your commitment to fostering an inclusive and equitable community?

This is my top priority. With my time on council I intend to help create a more inclusive and accessible dais opening the possibility of serving to more members of the community and crafting policy that ensures the city is more equitable for all its citizens far into the perceivable future.

Since 1980, the City of Colorado Springs has charged a 2% tax at hotels for nightly stays and a 1% tax on car rentals. The current hotel and rental taxes (LART) combined raise about $10 million annually in revenue for the City. There has been discussion recently about increasing the lodging tax from 2% to 4% and the rental car tax from 1% to 2%. Would you support such a move, and/or support placing the issue on a ballot for voters to consider? 

In this particular situation I do believe that sales tax is the appropriate mechanism. Our parks and open spaces are the crown jewel of the city and a major attraction to the region enjoyed by patrons from across the country and around the globe. Sales tax is actually the most equitable way to assure the contributions of both resident and tourist proportionate to their duration and in as much as they utilize the city.

Questionnaire from the Home Builders Association.

Q: Please tell us about yourself and why you are interested in running for elected office in Colorado Springs.

A: I am an entrepreneur, community advocate and long-time resident of Colorado Springs. I believe that I can represent the needs of the citizens well and hope to help craft policies that will allow for even greater participation, a wider array of representation, and ultimately a council more reflective of the economic and social diversity of the city.

Q: What do you identify as the top three issues facing Colorado Springs, and how do you think they should be addressed?

A: I would say that three largest issues facing the city today are public safety and emergency services, cost of living and affordable housing, and the rise in homelessness. I see these issues as somewhat overlapping

• I would address public safety firstly by examining the rate of pay for our law-enforcement officers and the cost of living for the region contrasted against other comparable municipalities. I would advocate for greater resources into ancillary programs, creating specialized departments with specific authorities and purview. Slow the stretching of services by focusing development on renewal and infill. With revitalization I believe we will also see a reduction in crime. It's my belief that the same way we account for resources like water when considering future developments we must also weigh growth against the current capabilities of our civil services.

• The cost of living and affordable housing is where I feel the HBA possesses its greatest abilities and responsibilities, working with the council as it always has, but with greater inclusion of the communities so we can make sure that we address the needs of our current residents as well as attracting new denizens. Encouraging its members to seek renewal and in-fill projects where needed and working with the city to make sure that development is balanced and sustainable.

• The homeless issue is at near crisis levels. The problem of homelessness is unique in that it cannot be adequately addressed through the standard means of fines and incarceration. Affordable, attainable and sustainable housing is a key component in addressing the problem. However, mental well-being is also a major factor in the homeless dilemma. I would push for greater mental health and shelter services distributed appropriately throughout the city, rather than relegated to certain portions, along with greater resources for connecting people to those services.

Q: What role does residential development play in your vision for the future of Colorado Springs, and what do you believe is the appropriate way for the city to guide housing development?

A: The economic benefits of development are numerous and widespread, however, a healthy balance must be maintained. I know first-hand the jobs created by development. My father started his own concrete company before I was born that is still in operation back in Arizona today and I myself began my married life working in the construction field doing plumbing installation in track housing. But I also know that for me, and many I worked with at the time, we could not afford even the modest homes we were building. There must be greater emphasis on development, both commercial and residential, that is attainable. This is how we bolster our working-class and inspire entrepreneurship, by making the prospects of business and home ownership feasible again.

Q: Affordable and attainable housing is a major concern for many citizens. Please share your thoughts on affordable and attainable housing and your policy ideas on this subject.

A: Change is rarely regarded with popularity but a lack of progress leads to decay. It is possible to renovate a community while keeping its characteristics. It requires robust community input to determine what is most prized and unique about the neighborhood, what defines it in the minds of its residents, and what is in the greatest need of updating. Infill must be approached with the understanding that these are established neighborhoods and not empty tracks of land. For many, choosing a neighborhood is like choosing a spouse, it can be a life-long commitment and while you want them to remain healthy as they age, there is little you would change about them.

Q: Address the role of metro districts in the development process and your view on these districts in the community development process.

A: Metro Districts are an invaluable tool in the development of a city, however, they are not without their complications. Due to the manner and mode in which the metro fees are collected they often muddy the waters when it comes to the public's understanding of property tax. In fact it is the public's misunderstandings of Metro Districts is my single biggest umbrage. I here people talk about roads, parks, and facilities as if they are being unfairly distributed by the city with the perception being that favoritism is being shown certain classes and neighborhoods and that city resources are being unfairly distributed when in actuality this is the purview of the Metro Districts they reside in. I see some Metro Districts fail to adequately adhere to the agreements that granted them that status and I see others who excel in that manner with little credit or accountability in either regard and I don't see much in the way of mechanisms for the council to assure they have lived up to their agreements.

Q: Provide your views on the city’s water supplies and policies around conservation, future acquisitions, possible expanded service areas for CSU, and development.

A: I supported the recent compromise the council approved from the CSU recommendation of 130% to 128%. While I trust the experts from the utilities department I, like some on the dais, would like to see what data was used to determine the recommended number. I would oppose any ordinance that would severely limit which developers might qualify for future projects or create a monopoly de facto. All discussion of the matter seems moot, however, if legislation is not in concert and in congruence with the county.

Q: What is your opinion of technical and vocational education and how could you and the City support workforce education and help school districts offer more vocational-learning opportunities?

A: The workforce education school programs I've seen presented before council have been very impressive and I would support their development and expansion. However, I want to see the distribution of these programs to seem more equitable and less targeted. It seemed the skill trade programs I witnessed were more targeted towards schools with a more impoverished populace while programs in more affluent schools focused on management courses.

Q: If faced with a significant economic downturn, what department or category in the City/County budget would be the most important to protect? Where would you make cuts?

A: With economic downturn always comes a greater need for emergency services. Economic pressure causes increased crime and social unrest. It underpins the social discrepancies inherent in our system and highlights the inequities. It strains relationships, household dynamics, and social structures. Controlling the chaos while providing crucial services is absolutely essential.

Q: Do you support the extension of TOPS (Trails, Open Space and Parks)?

A: I am a full supporter of extending and expanding our TOPS program. Our parks and open spaces are the crowning jewels of region and a major contributor to the appeal and quality of living in Colorado Springs. 

RESPONSES TO EMAILS

Support for the LGBTQ+ community

Email To City Council & Candidates

Dear Council Members and Candidates,

I am writing to propose that our city creates a dedicated channel on major streaming devices to improve access to information and engagement opportunities for our citizens.As we move towards a digital age, more and more people are choosing to consume their media through streaming devices such as Roku and FireTV. However, there is currently no dedicated channel for our city on these platforms.

By creating a dedicated channel, we can provide a range of benefits to our residents, including:

• Improved Communication - Our channel could serve as a valuable communication tool by announcing upcoming events, town hall meetings, and neighborhood or community notices. Additionally, it could feature job postings and board and commission vacancies, which can help residents to stay informed of employment opportunities and volunteer positions.

• Increased Civic Engagement - A dedicated channel could also feature content that encourages citizens to become more involved in local government and civic life. This could include interviews with elected officials, updates on city services, and other relevant information.

• Convenience and Accessibility - By creating a channel on these popular platforms, we can ensure that our residents can easily access city-related content from the comfort of their own homes.

I believe that creating a dedicated channel on streaming devices is an important step towards making our city more connected, more accessible, and more engaging for our residents.

Thank you for your consideration. I would be happy to discuss this proposal with you further.

Sincerely,

Jaymen C. Johnson

Dear Council Members and Candidates,

I am writing to reprise my long-standing proposal for a new and innovative way to celebrate our nation's independence - a drone show. As we all know, traditional fireworks are often associated with environmental damage, fire hazards, and noise pollution. However, a drone show is a safer, more sustainable, and visually stunning alternative that aligns perfectly with our city's identity as Olympic City USA and home of Space Force Command.

Drones are at the forefront of modern technology, and using them for our Independence Day celebrations would highlight our commitment to innovation and sustainability. With drones, we can create intricate and unique aerial displays that are visible from great distances. They can be programmed to pay tribute to our military or showcase our city's landmarks, and the possibilities are endless.

Furthermore, drones are reusable, reducing waste and costs in the long run. As a city that takes pride in our environmental responsibility, incorporating a drone show into our celebrations is a step towards a greener future.

There are many benefits to hosting a drone show. Firstly, it is a safer option as there is no risk of fires, which is particularly important in drought-prone areas. Additionally, traditional fireworks can be very loud, causing distress to those with PTSD, household pets, and contributing to noise pollution. A drone show can be programmed to produce a more controlled and quieter display that is less disruptive to the environment and people. Unlike traditional fireworks displays, drone shows are less likely to be cancelled due to environmental conditions such as weather or fire danger, ensuring a dependable and consistent celebration.

Cities like Paris and Beijing have already embraced drone technology for their Independence Day celebrations, and as Olympic City USA and home of Space Force Command, we should be at the forefront of innovation and technology.

It's worth emphasizing that the potential of using these drones extends beyond just the 4th of July celebration. These drones can be repurposed for other city-wide events throughout the year and even be utilized for emergency situations such as search and rescue operations or disaster evacuations.

Moreover, this proposal offers an opportunity for collaboration between our city and surrounding military institutions. The drones can be used for a range of events such as Air Force games, graduations, and military exercises. By incorporating drone technology into our city's events, we are showcasing our commitment to staying ahead of the curve in technological advancements and innovation.

Thank you for your consideration, and I look forward to discussing this proposal further.

Sincerely,

Jaymen C. Johnson

Council Candidate At-Large