Abstract: India, like many other countries, is marked by persistent son preference and resulting gender inequalities. In response, policymakers instituted several Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programs to encourage the birth and education of girls in smaller families, along with sterilization. I evaluate two large CCTs that provide generous subsidies for girls, one that is restricted to families without boys and one without such a restriction. Using retrospective fertility data from the Demographic Health Survey and employing a difference-in-differences methodology, I find that the policy without the restriction to girls increases the probability of having a subsidy-eligible child composition by 8% relative to women in neighboring control states, driven by an increase in families with a composition that includes a boy. In contrast, all-girl compositions do not increase under either policy, suggesting that the demand elasticity for daughters is higher in the presence of a son. Both policies increase sterilization at subsidized compositions, but the girl-restricted policy does so without affecting fertility, suggesting that it inefficiently incentivizes women toundergo the risky procedure. However, the girl-restricted policy, by requiring subsidized girls to start school one year before the legally mandated age, increased school enrollment, highlighting ts positive impact after birth.