Image credit: NASA Earth Observatory
Topography-Generated Lee Waves in Mean Shear
Key words: wave-mean interaction, wave-wave interaction, waves in shear, ocean modeling
Lee waves are an example of internal gravity waves forced by stably stratified flow over bathymetry. Oceanic internal lee waves have horizontal wavelengths between O(1–10) km that bridge mesoscale currents and small-scale turbulence and play a central role in the ocean’s energy cascade. Their generation exerts wave drag on balanced flow and extracts mesoscale energy, and their propagation transports this energy through wave-fluxes. When they break, they convert energy downscale to turbulent dissipation and mixing, maintaining the ocean’s stratification and, in turn, contributing to the large-scale circulation.
For the global energy budget (FIG. 1), roughly 1 terawatt of wind-work drives the ocean circulation, out of which 15–75% is used for lee-wave generation. A common assumption in recent ocean modeling literature is that this lee-wave generation is all lost to turbulent dissipation in a one-way forward energy cascade (from large to small scale; marked by the red dashed arrow in FIG. 1). However, this can be challenged by the fact that lee waves and their generating currents can exchange energy through wave-mean interaction and this exchange can be two-way. Thus, lee-wave generation may be partially reabsorbed back to bottom-intensified currents, which unveils a backward energy cascade (from small to large scale; marked by the green arrow in FIG. 1). Wave action conservation suggests that, in a steady flow, wave action A = E / ωL is conserved rather than wave energy E. As Doppler-shift alters waves’ Lagrangian frequency ωL = |ωE − kU| (where Eulerian frequency ωE is invariant, k is the along-stream topographic wavenumber, and U is flow velocity), shear will result in exchange of wave energy with the mean flow.
A natural testbed for wave-mean interaction and the resulting energy exchange is the Drake Passage and the Kerguelen Plateau in the Southern Ocean, where recent microstructure measurements of turbulent dissipation fall short of linear predictions of lee-wave generation by as much as an order of magnitude. This so-called suppression of turbulence might be explained by (i) nonlinear generation at the topography, (ii) reabsorption during lee-wave propagation, (iii) remote dissipation as freely propagating waves, or (iv) downstream advection from localized generating topography. Among these mechanisms, reabsorption through wave-mean interaction will emerge for asymmetric wave fields (e.g., due to wave trapping and dissipation) in mean shear and has largely been ignored in oceanic lee-wave modeling literature.
In this research, trapped lee waves in a bottom-intensified, laterally confined jet are put forward to examine energy exchange between lee-wave and mean fields as well as transfer to freely propagating waves that dissipate remotely. Regional numerical modeling is used to evaluate the four possible mechanisms for the observed suppression of turbulence and explore the fates of lee waves as dissipation, reabsorption, and remote dissipation in the presence of a range of topographic variations.
For the case of monochromatic topography with |kU|≈ 0.9N, where k is the along-stream topographic wavenumber, U is the near-bottom flow speed, and N is the buoyancy frequency; Reynolds-decomposed energy budget analysis is consistent with linear wave action conservation predictions that only 14% of lee-wave generation is dissipated, while up to 50% of lee-wave energy flux is reabsorbed into the mean flow. Thus, water column reabsorption needs to be taken into account as a possible mechanism for reducing the lee-wave dissipative sink for balanced circulation.
For broadband topographic spectra at mid- and high latitudes, the integrated dissipative fraction is 90–95% for linear generation by one-dimensional topography, suggesting that reabsorption may not explain the observed turbulence shortfall in the Southern Ocean.
A new parameterization for lee-wave energy sinks into reabsorption and dissipation as a function of lee-wave generation frequency is proposed, independent of the strength of turbulent parameterization. This research quantifies lee waves’ role in dissipating versus redistributing balanced energy and advance parameterizations of drag and mixing for balanced flow interacting with topography for oceanic general circulation models.
FIG. 2. Snapshots of meridional sections (upper row) and zonal sections (lower row) of zonal velocities for (a) the mean, (b,e) lee waves, and (c,f) free waves. In (c), the grey arrows indicate the direction of free-wave propagation, and the grey dashed semi-circle represents a wave front of surface-reflected free waves. In (d), yellow denotes where the Gradient Froude number Frg > 2 suggesting potential shear instability. The grey dotted vertical lines in (b), (c), (e), and (f) mark where the zonal and meridional sections are taken. Bottom topography (green dotted curve) is amplified by a factor of 5 to be visible.
Wu, Y., E. Kunze, A. Tandon, A. Mahadevan: Spontaneous generation of near-inertial waves at lee-wave critical layers. In preparation.
Wu, Y., E. Kunze, A. Tandon, and A. Mahadevan, 2023: Reabsorption of lee-wave energy in bottom-intensified currents. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 53 (2), 477–491, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-22-0058.1