Image credit: NASA Earth Observatory
Topography-Generated Lee Waves in Shear Flows
Key words: wave-mean interaction, wave-wave interaction, ocean modeling
Lee waves are an example of internal gravity waves forced by stably stratified flow over bathymetry. Oceanic internal lee waves have horizontal wavelengths between O(1–10) km that bridge mesoscale currents and small-scale turbulence and play a central role in the ocean’s energy cascade. Their generation exerts wave drag on balanced flow and extracts mesoscale energy, and their propagation transports this energy through wave-fluxes. When they break, they convert energy downscale to turbulent dissipation and mixing, maintaining the ocean’s stratification and, in turn, contributing to the large-scale circulation.
For the global energy budget (FIG. 1), roughly 1 terawatt of wind-work drives the ocean circulation, out of which 15–75% is used for lee-wave generation. A common assumption in recent ocean modeling literature is that this lee-wave generation is all lost to turbulent dissipation in a one-way forward energy cascade (from large to small scale; marked by the red dashed arrow in FIG. 1). However, this can be challenged by the fact that lee waves and their generating currents can exchange energy through wave-mean interaction and this exchange can be two-way. Thus, lee-wave generation may be partially reabsorbed back to bottom-intensified currents, which unveils a backward energy cascade (from small to large scale; marked by the green arrow in FIG. 1). Wave action conservation suggests that, in a steady flow, wave action A = E / ωL is conserved rather than wave energy E. As Doppler-shift alters waves’ Lagrangian frequency ωL = |ωE − kU| (where Eulerian frequency ωE is invariant, k is the along-stream topographic wavenumber, and U is flow velocity), shear will result in energy exchange between waves and the mean flow.
A natural testbed for wave-mean interaction and the resulting energy exchange is the Southern Ocean, where microstructure measurements of turbulent dissipation rates fall short of linear predictions of lee-wave generation by as much as an order of magnitude. This so-called suppression of turbulence can be explained by (i) nonlinear generation by steep topography, (ii) reabsorption in bottom-intensified flow, (iii) remote dissipation as freely propagating waves, or (iv) downstream advection from localized topography. Among these mechanisms, reabsorption will emerge in vertically asymmetric lee-wave fields due to critical-layer trapping but has been overlooked in literature.
In this research, trapped lee waves in a bottom-intensified, laterally confined jet are put forward to examine wave-mean and wave-wave interactions in sheared ocean environment. Regional numerical modeling is used to explore the fates of lee waves as reabsorption and dissipation in the presence of a range of topographic variations.
For monochromatic topography with |kU|≈ 0.9N (where k is the along-stream topographic wavenumber, U is the near-bottom flow speed, and N is the buoyancy frequency), Reynolds-decomposed energy budget analysis is consistent with wave action conservation predictions, confirming that only 14% of the upward lee-wave energy flux is dissipated, while up to 50% is reabsorbed into the sheared mean flow. Thus, reabsorption needs to be taken into account as a possible mechanism for reducing the lee-wave dissipative sink for balanced circulation.
For broadband topography at mid- and high latitudes, the integrated dissipative fraction is 90–95%, suggesting that reabsorption is not sufficient to explain the observed turbulence shortfall in the Southern Ocean.
A new parameterization for lee-wave energy sinks into reabsorption and dissipation as a function of lee-wave generation frequency is proposed, independent of the strength of turbulent parameterization.
This research quantifies lee waves’ role in dissipating versus redistributing balanced energy and advance parameterizations of drag and mixing for balanced flow interacting with topography for oceanic general circulation models.
FIG. 2. Snapshots of meridional sections (upper row) and zonal sections (lower row) of zonal velocities for (a) the mean, (b,e) lee waves, and (c,f) free waves. In (c), the grey arrows indicate the direction of free-wave propagation, and the grey dashed semi-circle represents a wave front of surface-reflected free waves. In (d), yellow denotes where the Gradient Froude number Frg > 2 suggesting potential shear instability. The grey dotted vertical lines in (b), (c), (e), and (f) mark where the zonal and meridional sections are taken. Bottom topography (green dotted curve) is amplified by a factor of 5 to be visible.
Wu, Y., Kunze, E., Tandon, A., and Mahadevan, A. Lee-Wave Energy Sinks in Bottom-Intensified Flow. Under revision for Journal of Physical Oceanography.
Wu, Y., Kunze, E., Tandon, A., and Mahadevan, A. (2023). Reabsorption of Lee-Wave Energy in Bottom-Intensified Currents. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 53(2) pp. 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-22-0058.1