This paper studies the welfare implications of input tariff liberalization in a model that features firm heterogeneity in both exposure and responses to input tariff shocks. We show that this setting gives rise to a new anti-competitive effect that extends the benchmark welfare gains from trade liberalization. We derive a sufficient statistic for the anti-competitive effect in a general environment — the correlation between firm market shares and their cost shares of imported inputs. The interplay between import-intensiveness and market power implies that larger firms both benefit more from input tariff cuts and pass through less of the cost reductions, leading to an increased dispersion of markups in the aggregate. We use a unique collection of firm-level microdata from Colombia around its 2010 trade reform to empirically test this framework. The dataset records the entirety of firm-level inputs, both imported and domestically sourced, which enables us to disentangle and identify firm-specific exposure and responses to input tariff shocks. Our quantitative analysis demonstrates that input tariff liberalization brings about a substantial anti-competitive effect, whose magnitude can be on par with the pro-competitive effects in the episode we study.

WORK IN PROGRESS

Market-Specific Marketing Capital, with Costas Arkolakis and Sam Kortum [Slides]

Recent studies document the disparity between short- and long-run trade elasticities. In this paper, we propose a dynamic multi-country general equilibrium model with market-specific marketing capital and convex capital adjustment costs to account for the persistence in bilateral trade flow responses. Our model predicts that the dynamic effects of the Trump tariff shocks can take around two decades to die out. We connect the model to a reduced-form dynamic gravity equation with multiple horizons to decompose the long-run trade elasticity into the "static trade elasticity" and the "dynamic trade elasticity". Incorporating the dynamic effects, our estimate of long-run trade elasticity is two times as large as the short-run elasticity.

POLICY WORK

Household Saving Rates in the Eurozone: Evidence from Cross-Country Survey Data, with Kamil Dybczk, Shiqing Hua, Mariusz Jarmuzek, and Ruifeng Zhang, IMF Working Paper No. 2023/150

The paper looks into the puzzle of low household savings in three Southern European (SE3) countries – Cyprus, Greece, and Portugal. Building on the household saving drivers literature, we employ cross-country micro-level data and investigate the key saving patterns, examining their heterogeneity across households in SE3 countries relative to the EA average. The results confirm the prominent role of income, along with interest rate, inflation, fiscal balance, and debt in shaping household savings in SE3 countries. Quantile regressions employed to analyze saving behavior across the distribution of households suggest that households with lower savings tend to see their savings dip (or dissavings rise) more-than-proportionately with shocks to income, interest rate, inflation, and government balance. Our policy simulations across the distribution of households suggest that targeted rather than universal policy intervention could improve household savings, especially of the most vulnerable ones.

PRE-DOCTORAL WORK

Exploring the Impact of High-Speed Railways on the Spatial Redistribution of Economic Activities - Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration as a Case Study, with Xijing Li, Rongrong Li, and Bo Huang,  Journal of Transport Geography, 2016, Vol. 57, 194-206.

The high-speed railway (HSR) network in China has developed rapidly over the past ten years, offering a new means of travel and also regenerating and redistributing economic activities by encouraging population mobility. Using the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration as a case study, this paper investigates the redistribution of economic activities resulting from HSRs by developing a locally weighted regression model, geographically network weighted regression (GNWR). This GNWR is formulated in light of the current account identity in economics and incorporates the changes in network-based travel time from HSRs and the degrees of cities, thereby offering a more appropriate method of capturing the movement of economic activities. Importantly, the coefficients in GNWR can reflect the net inflow or outflow of different cities in terms of their residents' investment and/or consumption. The results of the analysis show that HSRs have significantly changed the spatial redistribution of economic activities due to more frequent and rapid mobility. For investment activities, HSR drew the inflow to the second-tier cities alongside HSR and strengthened the status of core cities; for consumption activities, HSR motivated the inflow to non-HSR cities located in the peripheral areas.