One of the constant refrains of college admissions officers is that they select students not so much for their prior accomplishments, but rather for their potential to make productive use of that college’s resources. Unfulfilled promise signals youth, energy and long-term investment. But is it wise to put one’s faith in something unseen, merely hoping that it may blossom in the future? Just ask anyone dissatisfied with the failed promises of our elected leaders.
Does potential have a shelf life? Is it possible to live a good life valuing potential over accomplishment? If we are called to serve others and make the most of our talents, isn’t singularly focusing on potential wrong? This dichotomy has its metaphysical roots as well—Aristotle himself drew up a distinction between potentiality and actuality.
