If you want discreet, small in-ear earbuds with up to 24 hours of listening time from the charging case for study, choose Xmenha X55; if you need translation features, active noise cancellation, and a broader set of functions, choose MINISO MS105. The X55 is the more focused pick for unobtrusive listening, while the MS105 is built for communication as well as audio.
• Xmenha X55 strength: Small, lightweight in-ear design and up to 24 hours of battery life with the case. Trade-off: Its stated listening time is five hours per charge, and it does not offer the MS105’s translation modes or active noise cancellation.
• MINISO MS105 strength: Combines music, calls, sleep mode, and real-time translation, with eight translation modes and active noise cancellation. Trade-off: Its feature set is more specialized, and the product information does not state a battery-life figure.
• Choose X55 if your priority is compact earbuds for everyday listening, including study sessions where a small in-ear shape appeals to you.
• Choose MS105 if you want translation tools alongside music and calls, or value a stated active noise-cancellation feature.
• Neither is a direct match for every shopper looking for open ear earbuds for study: both are described as in-ear products.
The Xmenha X55 is the simpler of these two earbuds. Its main distinction is its mini, lightweight in-ear design, described as intended for sleep and side sleeping. The product information also says the earbuds can be worn during work or leisure. That makes the X55 worth considering if you want a discreet shape for a quiet study space, a commute, or listening before bed, rather than a device built around translation features.
Battery details are relatively clear: the earbuds are specified for up to five hours of listening on one charge, with 24 hours of battery life when the charging case is included. That case-based figure is useful for planning a day of listening, though it does not mean the earbuds can play continuously for 24 hours without recharging. Bluetooth 5.3 and a stated 10-meter Bluetooth range describe the connection setup. The product also lists sound isolation, a dynamic driver, and a 20 Hz–20,000 Hz frequency range.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-23 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
For study, the appeal is the compact fit and straightforward audio role. The X55 does not list a microphone or call-focused feature, so I would not choose it specifically for crystal clear calls in ear earbuds for study. Its advertised sound features include a Graphene diaphragm and reduced sound leakage, but those descriptions do not provide a measurable call-performance guarantee. The product’s control method is listed as an app, which is another practical detail to check against your preferred phone setup.
Who should skip it: Skip the X55 if you specifically want real-time translation, active noise cancellation, or a stated listening period longer than five hours per charge.
The MINISO MS105 is the more feature-heavy option. It combines music playback, phone calls, sleep mode, and real-time translation. Its eight listed translation modes include AI Dialogue, Free Talk, Translation Machine, Headphone & Phone, Photo Translation, Voice Note, AI Video Captions, and Real-Time Translation. The product title refers to support for 165 languages, but the practical draw is the variety of communication tools rather than a simple music-first design.
That range could suit someone who wants one pair of earbuds for calls, language learning, and travel conversations. The shared design is described as allowing two people to wear the device while conversing in different languages. Bluetooth 6.0, a 10-meter range, dynamic drivers, and a 20 Hz–20,000 Hz frequency range are also listed. The product page describes 13 mm speakers and HD stereo sound. Those specifications help explain its audio positioning, but they do not establish how well every translation mode will work in a particular setting.
For study, the MS105 has a potential advantage if your sessions involve language practice, translation, or voice notes. It also lists active noise cancellation, with a claim of blocking up to 98% of background noise. That may make the feature relevant in busy surroundings, but the stated claim should not be read as a guarantee that all noise will disappear. The MS105 uses touch controls, and four earbud tips are listed in the package details. Unlike the X55, its information does not give a battery-life figure, so there is less concrete guidance for planning long sessions between charges.
Who should skip it: Skip the MS105 if you want a minimal pair of earbuds mainly for discreet listening or need a clearly stated battery-life estimate.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
Start with the way you plan to use the earbuds, not with a single specification. The X55 is easier to assess for listening time because its battery information includes five hours per charge and up to 24 hours with the case. The MS105 may offer more study-related tools if you are learning a language, using translation, or making calls, but its product information does not provide a battery-life figure. If you regularly study in long blocks, that missing detail is worth considering before choosing it.
Fit and controls are also distinct. The X55 is described as mini and lightweight, with a design intended for sleep and side sleeping. The MS105 is described as ergonomic and comes with four earbud tips. Those descriptions point to different priorities, but they do not tell you exactly how either pair will fit your ears. The X55 lists app control, while the MS105 lists touch control. Think about which style feels more convenient for the way you use earbuds.
My Verdict
I would choose the Xmenha X55 for study if my priority were a small, discreet pair with a stated case-inclusive listening figure. Its compact design and simple audio focus make the decision easier for everyday listening.
I would choose the MINISO MS105 instead if translation, language practice, or active noise cancellation mattered more than a clearly documented battery-life figure. For my own study-focused pick, I prefer the X55’s more specific battery information and focused design.
For ordinary listening, the X55 offers a small design and a stated five hours per charge, with up to 24 hours including the case. For language learning or translation-based study, the MS105 offers more relevant functions, including voice notes and translation modes.
Yes. Its product information lists active noise cancellation and claims it can block up to 98% of background noise. That is a product claim, not a guarantee that all sounds will be eliminated in every environment.
The X55 lists five hours of listening on a full charge and 24 hours with the charging case. The MS105’s product information does not state a battery-life figure, so the available details do not support a direct battery-duration comparison.
No. Both products are described as in-ear earbuds. If you specifically want open ear earbuds for study, neither product matches that design description.
• Marley House vs MEE audio KidJamz KJ45BT comparison
• Rosmas Earbuds vs CCA Falcon 2: Gaming Earbuds
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.