If you want lightweight comfort, touch controls, and a stated 24 hours of total listening with the case, choose Xmenha True; if you need active noise cancellation and IPX5 water resistance, choose RadioShack TWS Earbuds. For jogging, I’d lean toward Xmenha for its running-friendly fit description and longer stated total playtime, while RadioShack has the clearer advantage for noise cancellation and a water-resistance rating.
• Xmenha True: Its ergonomic design is described as staying in place while running, and the case extends stated listening time to 24 hours. Its trade-off: the sheet specifies sound isolation, not active noise cancellation, and does not list a water-resistance rating.
• RadioShack TWS Earbuds: Active noise cancellation and an IPX5 rating are its standout features. Its trade-off: the supplied specifications do not state total listening hours or describe a running-focused fit.
• Choose Xmenha True if comfort, pocketable carrying, touch controls, and stated all-day case-supported listening matter most.
• Choose RadioShack if you prioritize active noise cancellation and a stated IPX5 rating over a documented fit or total-playtime figure.
Xmenha True is the more clearly described option for someone who wants compact earbuds for everyday movement. Its ergonomic design is specifically presented as suitable for running and dancing, and it is also described as workable for people wearing glasses. That makes it a reasonable fit to consider for jogging, especially if you want earbuds that the product information says are designed to stay on during activity. The sheet does not provide a fit test or a guarantee that they will suit every ear, so comfort will still be personal.
The battery information gives a useful planning point: up to five hours of listening from a full charge, with up to 24 hours when the charging case is included. The case is described as compact enough to fit in a pocket. For a jog followed by a commute or a day of casual listening, that case-supported total may be more relevant than the single-charge figure. Bluetooth 5.3, automatic connection when opening the case, and touch controls for music, volume, calls, and a voice assistant add convenience without requiring a headphone jack.
For calls, Xmenha lists microphone noise reduction and noise-cancellation methods intended to help voices remain clearer in noisy surroundings. Its sound-control specification is sound isolation, however, which is not the same as RadioShack’s listed active noise cancellation. The sheet also lists a 20 Hz–20,000 Hz frequency range and a dynamic driver, but those figures alone do not establish how the earbuds will sound to any particular listener.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Who should skip Xmenha True: Skip it if active noise cancellation or a stated water-resistance rating is essential; neither is specified for this model.
RadioShack TWS Earbuds put noise control at the center of their appeal. The specification lists active noise cancellation, which distinguishes them from Xmenha’s sound-isolation description. That could make RadioShack the more suitable choice for someone who often listens around steady background noise and wants a feature specifically identified as active cancellation.
The earbuds use Bluetooth 5.4 with a Bluetrum AB5636F chipset, and the product information describes instant pairing. That gives buyers a newer listed Bluetooth version than Xmenha’s 5.3, but version numbers alone do not prove that one connection will work better in every setting. RadioShack also lists 35 mAh batteries in the earbuds and a 460 mAh charging case. Those capacities are useful specifications, but no listening-hours figure is provided, so there is no factual basis here for comparing its total runtime directly with Xmenha’s stated 24 hours.
RadioShack’s listed IPX5 rating is a practical distinction for people concerned about exposure to water. The product information describes an in-ear design, a plastic enclosure, and a dynamic driver, with a listed frequency range of 20 Hz–20,000 Hz. These details may help narrow a choice, but they do not tell us how the earbuds will fit an individual runner or how their sound will compare in a listening test. The supplied information also does not describe a jogging-specific fit, touch controls, or a call microphone feature.
Who should skip RadioShack: Skip it if you need a clearly stated total listening time or want documented running-focused fit details before choosing.
• Best for jogging based on the stated fit description → Xmenha True. Its ergonomic design is described as staying in place during running. RadioShack’s sheet gives no comparable activity-fit detail.
• Best for active noise cancellation → RadioShack TWS Earbuds. Active noise cancellation is explicitly listed; Xmenha specifies sound isolation and call-noise reduction instead.
• Best for documented total case-supported playtime → Xmenha True. It lists up to 24 hours with the case, including up to five hours per charge.
• Best for a stated water-resistance rating → RadioShack TWS Earbuds. Its product information lists IPX5; Xmenha’s sheet does not provide a water-resistance rating.
• Best for touch control over music and calls → Xmenha True. Its listed touch functions include track changes, volume, calls, and voice-assistant access.
• Best for a described automatic case connection → Xmenha True. The product description says opening the case starts the connection process. RadioShack instead highlights instant pairing.
• Best for a newer listed Bluetooth version → RadioShack TWS Earbuds. It specifies Bluetooth 5.4, compared with Xmenha’s Bluetooth 5.3, though that difference alone does not settle overall performance.
• Best for stated microphone noise reduction during calls → Xmenha True. Its sheet describes microphone noise reduction; RadioShack’s supplied details do not specify a call feature.
Buying Considerations
Think carefully about what “noise cancellation” means in this comparison. RadioShack explicitly lists active noise cancellation. Xmenha lists sound isolation and describes microphone noise reduction for calls. These are not interchangeable claims: one concerns active noise control for listening, while the other details include passive isolation and clearer-call aims. If your main goal is reducing surrounding sound while listening, RadioShack has the more direct specification. If your priority is voice clarity during calls, Xmenha provides the more specific microphone-related information.
Battery figures need similar care. Xmenha states up to five hours per charge and up to 24 hours with the case. RadioShack gives battery capacities—35 mAh per earbud and 460 mAh for the case—but not an equivalent listening-time estimate. Capacity alone does not tell a buyer how many hours of playback to expect, so I would not treat those numbers as proof that either model lasts longer.
Search phrases like “best crystal clear calls wireless earbuds for jogging” often combine two separate priorities. Xmenha is the one with a stated microphone noise-reduction feature and a running-friendly design description, but the sheet does not promise crystal-clear calls in every environment. Likewise, shoppers looking for the “best foldable in ear earbuds for jogging” or “foldable bluetooth headphones for jogging” should note that neither product is described as foldable. Both are wireless earbuds with charging cases; the supplied facts do not support calling either one foldable.
Finally, consider the controls and what is left unspecified. Xmenha lists touch controls for common phone and music functions, while RadioShack’s provided information does not detail its control method. RadioShack’s noise cancellation and IPX5 rating are meaningful advantages, but its sheet leaves total playback time, jogging fit, and call-control specifics unclear. If those details are deal-breakers, check the product information carefully before deciding.
My Verdict
I also prefer its documented touch controls and call-noise-reduction details for everyday use.
I’d pick RadioShack instead if active noise cancellation and an IPX5 rating matter more than a stated runtime or activity-specific fit information.
For my own needs, Xmenha is the more complete match for a jog followed by ordinary daily listening.
Xmenha’s design is specifically described as staying in place during running, so it has the clearer jogging-related fit information. RadioShack lists an IPX5 rating but does not provide a comparable running-fit description.
Yes. Xmenha lists sound isolation and microphone noise reduction for calls, which are different claims.
The listed playback time is up to five hours on a full charge, with up to 24 hours when counting the charging case. RadioShack’s sheet gives battery capacities but does not state equivalent listening hours.
Neither product is described as foldable in the supplied information. Both are presented as wireless earbuds with charging cases, so shoppers seeking foldable earbuds should verify that feature before choosing.
• Vanderfields Noise Reduction Earmuffs vs Bulktech 5
• abcGoodefg 1 vs Conambo K18: Ear Pieces
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.