There are two ways which completely depends on your requirements. First if you want to change before analyzing the code then you have to edit the plugin for this for ex: SonarJava( -java/blob/master/java-checks/src/main/resources/org/sonar/l10n/java/rules/squid/S100_java.json) you can locate the rules with their respective RSPEC key(in this case it is S100) and change the type to CODE_SMELLS. After that you need to package the plugin and create the jar file and then put that into sonarqube server plugin directory and restart the sonarqube.
Just to gather more information, is there any link or documentation where I can get more information about how to get the plugin for a particular rule? Does this way of updating the plugin code work for rules in Quality Profiles that are copied from the default profile?
Aside of the rules/repositories technicalities, I have to say that I would very strongly advice against modifying a plugin you do not own for the sole purpose of changing a rule type to comply to a requirement.
As you suggested that I can get the plugin from the rules repository and I was able to figure out that the rules that I am referring to are from the SonarTSQL plugin, but can you help me find out where can I get the actual code of these rules?
As @vicky suggested that I can go to to find my plugin, but when I search there, I do not see any plugin with the name sonarTSQL. What I get is sonar-tsql-plugin which is present at -tsql-plugin. How would I know whether this is the one that contains rules that I am using on my SonarQube? Because as I traverse through all the folders, I do not find any files that contain the rules that I currently see on my sonarQube. Can you please guide me here?
For an apparently complicated scenario like this, please consider diagraming this out (before and after), and post those images. That may help the community to suggest how to create the rules you are asking about. Thanks!
Chess always starts with 32 pieces on 64 squares, has well documented officially agreed upon rules, and most importantly has a clearly defined objective. In each turn, there are a finite number of possible moves. Playing chess is just following a rules engine. AI systems can calculate the repercussions of every move to select the move most likely outcome to capture an opponent's piece or gain position, and ultimately win.
Like chess-playing AI programs, self-driving cars largely use rules-based engines to make decisions. Unlike the chess programs, the rules on how to navigate every possible situation are not clearly defined. There are thousands of little judgments drivers make in a given trip avoiding pedestrians, navigating around double-parked cars, and turning in busy intersections. Getting those judgments right means the difference between arriving at the mall safely or arriving at the hospital.
As someone konws, UE has a Localization Dashboard which is able to gather text from code, package, metadata and so on. However, I found a bug and a few hidden rules when I using the Localization feature UE4 provides. I would like sharing them with you guys in case some guys facing the same problem right now.
This article will provide more specific and detailed information regarding rules that only apply to Hypixel SkyBlock. By choosing to play SkyBlock you agree to follow all the rules listed below, as well as our Terms of Service & Hypixel Rules.
Players found breaking these rules can expect a suspension of chat privileges or access to the Hypixel Server and Discord. Our rules are here to maintain a welcoming and safe environment for all players.
Errata PageUpdated September 9, 2002X-Bugs Sets 1 and 2:Yes . . . a bug crept into the rules! In the fourthparagraph under Team Play, the reference should be to yourally's pieces. You can't move your enemy's pieces with your own dierolls, either, of course, but that wasn't the point!USArthropods: The Order of Battle says there are six Soldiers and threeGreen Berets. This matches the samples which we were given to develop theU.S. edition, but the actual print run of stickers supplied to us byNexus,the Italian publishers, has five Soldiers and four Green Berets. Theyassure us that this change was playtested by them and is an improvement.
Landlords are required to install carbon monoxide alarms in rental units. Tenants must maintain the alarms, including regular replacement of batteries. Alarms must be located outside each separate sleeping area and on each level of the residence. For more information on the carbon monoxide alarm requirements, see the State Building Code Council's carbon monoxide alarm rules.
In general, alert rules are created for a table field but through a form data source by iterating through all form controls. This is why the Create a custom alert form is opening so slowly from the Release product details form that contains many form controls bound to the fields from many data sources.
To keep code clean and healthy, development teams must adhere to guidelines and best practices that enable them to create better code consistently. We refer to these coding rules, techniques, and accepted best practices as coding standards.
Coding standards, also known as coding guidelines or programming style guides, are rules and conventions that developers follow when writing code. These rules define the code characteristics necessary to maintain a uniform codebase and facilitate collaboration among developers.
Codacy allows you to automate the static code analysis process by creating coding standards within the platform to ensure that groups of repositories follow the same security rules or coding conventions, for example. To see how it works, start your free 14-day Codacy trial today.
While running an analysis, SonarQube raises an issue every time a piece of code breaks a coding rule. The set of coding rules are defined by the associated quality profile for each language in the project.
An issue can have multiple severities if it impacts more than one software quality. For example, an issue can have a high impact on the security of your software, but a low impact on its maintainability. As rules get updated, this will apply to more and more issues.
Once an issue has been determined to be "new" as described above, the next question is what date to give it. For instance, what if the issue has existed in code for a long time but was only found in the most recent analysis because new rules were added to the profile? Should this issue be given the date of the last change on its line, or the date of the analysis where it was first raised? That is, should it be backdated? If the date of the last change to the line is available (this requires SCM integration) then under these circumstances, the issue will be backdated:
If you tend to mark a lot of issues as False Positive or Won't Fix, it means that some coding rules are not appropriate for your context. You can either completely deactivate issues in the quality profile or use issue exclusions to narrow the focus of the rules so they are not used on specific parts (or types of objects) of your application; check out the documentation on defining the analysis scope for more details about inclusions and exclusions. Similarly, making a lot of severity changes should prompt you to consider updating the rule severities in your profiles.
You can also edit an issue's tags. Issues inherit the tags of the rules that created them, but the tag set on an issue is fully editable. Tags can be created, added, and removed at will for users with the Browse permission level on the project.
With the useEffect() Hook, you can efficiently perform side effects (similar to lifecycle methods) such as when your application mounts/renders or when a value updates. You can read about useEffect(), and its rules here.
Knowing these rules is not enough; you must enforce and abide by them too. It is easy to follow these rules when working alone on a project, but when working in a team or on an external project, it is a good idea to devise ways to check if these rules are followed to reduce the chance of introducing bugs into the code.
Consider a finder who spends weeks or months of unpaid work to discover and document a security flaw. Someone else independently discovers, documents and submits that same bug five minutes before the first finder. Under the rules of most HackerOne and Bugcrowd bounty programs, the first submitter gets all the money, the second finder gets nothing.
Bug bounty life comes with hidden pressures and common frustrations that require soft skills to navigate - which isn't something people often talk about. So, I've come up with "10 rules to be successful in your bounty career.
In my personal opinion, the DD0004 message you obtain is a false positive: there is indeed no (at least CDISC) rule that says that def:HasNoData is not allowed on ValueList-ItemRefs. I consider this as an over-interpretation of the define.xml 2.1 specification. Also, there is no such rule in the CDISC "Define-XML 2.1 validation rules".
IMO, adding it also to ValueList-Items is extremely useful as it allows to say to the reviewer, that, after transposal, the thus generated column will be empty.
But maybe this rule has been "invented" by FDA/P21 "on top" of the define.xml 2.1 rules.
There is no relation at all between "Alias" and "SASFieldName". The latter is only useful for when using SAS as an indication what the generated field name is. When e.g. using R, SASFieldName has no meaning. "Alias" is however completely independent of anything else.
One is completely free to choose the value for "Context" in "Alias". Doing so for Context="SAS" is indicating: In the context of using SAS, a synonym for the variable is XXX where XXX is the value of the "Name" attribute. There is no rule in Define-xml 2.1 whatsoever values for "Context" are allowed.
Also here, maybe this rule has been "invented" by FDA/P21 "on top" of the define.xml 2.1 rules. It surely is not a CDISC rule.
Regarding DD0124 - "Expected Codelist is missing", this cannot be a Define-XML rule. The Define-XML specification does not say at all for which variables a codelist is expected, as the Define-XML specification does not know anything about the semantics/meaning of variables and their names. This could be an SENDIG-rule, but then it should not appear in the rules regarding Define-XML. We usually name this a kind of rule "cross-standard-validation rule" as as well the define.xml as the SDTMIG/SENDIG is involved.
So, although it cannot be a Define-XML rule, it still may not be a false positive (but with the incorrect code) in the sense of SENDIG. Reason is that the associated codelist is always about the "possible values than can be expected". For example, if you never have a value for an Albumin measurement (in LB), but it was planned to do Albumin measurements, you still will need to have "ALB" in your CodeList associated to LBTESTCD. Similar, in your case, LBUSCHFL, even when there never is a value, there could have been a case where there is a value, and thus the codelist (with the only value being "Y" I presume) should be provided.
Please check the SENDIG rules for finding out what the exact rules concerning the use of codelists are.
de7ca951e2