Stars comparable in size to the Sun eventually evolve into red giants, at which time they engulf their inner planets and destroy them. Planets, asteroids and comets that are beyond the distance Jupiter currently is from the Sun would survive. That means we can look around the final remnants of the stars, which are "white dwarfs", to take an inventory of what planets and other material remain in planetary systems. The great thing about this technique is that the white dwarfs are small and faint, so we can directly see planets (which have their own heat due to radioactive decay of elements inside them). The first detection of such a planet was made with James Webb Space Telescope by a team I am working with. My research on this topic started with studying crumbled asteroids. I showed that the brightest white dwarf planetary material, around G29-38, was due to dust and not a planet or companion star. And from the spectrum, I showed the type of dust includes glassy and crystalline silicates as well as other materials.
The evidence for water on the Moon arises from multiple lines of evidence (neutron probes for hydrogen, ultraviolet reflectance [LRO], and near-infrared reflectance [Chandayan/M3, Spex]), though the evidence has been considered indirect because it traces only parts of the water molecule and possible H or OH from other carriers. Using SOFIA, water was detected uniquely, because the 6 micron emissivity feature of the surface arises from a bending mode of the H2O molecule requiring all three atoms. I am part of a legacy science team that is significantly extending the discovery paper, making the first images of the distribution of water across the lunar surface. We hope to provide constraints on whether the water is inside lunar regolith materials, as opposed to being outgassed and migrating over the surface, eventually ending up at the permanently shadowed regions near the poles that are the focus of multiple upcoming NASA and international space agencies' missions. The study of natural lunar water becomes more urgent as human exploration will inevitably pollute the moon to the extent that its natural state is overwhelmed.
One of my research projects research focuses on the nature of diffuse interstellar clouds. I use infrared and radio observations to measure the amount of dust and gas, which showed that there are clouds of molecular gas that are not bright in CO. This material is now known as "dark gas" (named by a gamma-ray astronomer). In my work, I identified isolated, nearby, 100 solar mass clouds that are not forming stars. The first paper identified the clouds and made an assessment of their contents using Planck to measure the dust content and Arecibo to measure atomic gas. We found the locations of excess infrared emission are spatially coherent and identified three hypotheses for the nature of the apparent "dark gas". The second paper showed the "dark gas" is not cold, atomic gas, which would have shown 21-cm absorption in new Arecibo observations. The third paper examined the effect of dust property evolution in diffuse clouds, which contributes to the apparent far-infrared excess but falls short of explaining all of it, which still requires molecular gas. The fourth and final paper of the series examined pairs of diffuse clouds with significant far-infrared excess and compared them to shock models, making the point that motion of the clouds through their surrounding medium leads to shocks that enhance molecule formation.
Comets are composed of ice and rock. My work on the larger pieces of rocky material that are produced by comets suggests the comets in the inner Solar System are mostly rock. I learned this by studying the trail of debris that comets leave behind in their orbits. This is the same type of material that makes meteor showers when the Earth passes through them. Using wide-field infrared images, we can observe them in the sky even when we can't see the individual meteoroids; they are heated by sunlight and emit infrared radiation as they cool. The infrared dust trails from comets were a surprise discovery in the first infrared telescope to survey the sky, in 1983.
Here is a copy of my 2007 paper describing the results of the observations.
My 2009 paper shows how the fragments of the comet are in three classes: the major fragments (which look like individual comets themselves, mostly with tails, and of which there are more than 50), the debris trail (which is the swarm of debris that fills the comet's orbit, like a meteoroid stream, and makes the diagonal line of brightness across the entire image), and dust (which makes the tails from each of the major fragments). The theoretical part of the paper explains the dynamics of each class of debris. The smaller fragments are strongly affected by a "rocket effect" that is caused by the gases being released from thir surfaces as they sublimate after being exposed to sunlight. The dust dynamics are dominated by radiation pressure, which sweeps them back into tails that point away from the Sun. The debris trail particles feel slight radiation pressure and are dispersed along the orbit by the combination of that slight radiation pressure and the small kick in speed that they got during release from the comet. I show that the debris trail particles must be "dry" with no ice, or else they would feel the rocket effect that so strongly dominates the small fragments seen in the Hubble images. (A webpage has some other images from the split-up including the Hubble ones. A short news article is on the JPL website.)
My 2010 paper describing the results of the observations of this amazing comet explosion. The main part is determining the properties of the explosion that spread the ejecta around the comet in the observed pattern. The Spitzer Space Telescope images are probably the best images of the ejecta pattern. I make a simple theoretical model for the explosion being the result of a subsurface cavern of amorphous ice, which explosively released gases until it broke through the surface. A fun part of the work was comparing the observations to old photographic plates taken by E. E. Barnard from a similar explosion of the same comet in 1892. I was able to register and calibrate the image using background stars using astrometry.net. The 2007 explosion occurred around the same place in the comet's orbit as the 1892 one, which is remarkable and unexplained.
A nice news article appeared in Astronomy Now.
The Earth's orbit is filled with debris from comets and asteroids, trapped there by gravitational resonances. My paper from 2010 showed the structure of the ring as seen by the Spitzer Space Telescope as it passed through the ring. Here is a link to my paper from 1995, which confirmed the existence of the ring using the Cosmic Background Explorer. A nice news story appeared in Wired Science.