By 1940, the population of Kentucky was 2.8 million, and half of those individuals were served by WPA libraries. (Jeffrey 2001) The 80,016 registered borrowers were still below ALA standards, but not when one considers the immense challenges the WPA library project faced, including geographic difficulties, quality of book supply, the newness of some patrons’ reading habits, and the constant challenge of convincing individuals to make use of the WPA library services.
May V. Kunz, director of the WPA statewide library projects wrote in the December, 1941, issue of the bulletin of the Kentucky Library Association wrote of these challenges faced by the project, in addition to personnel difficulties. Not only was there a shortage of supervisors, due to federal regulations that permitted only 5% of WPA employees to serve in a supervisory role, but she stressed that it was important to remember that the WPA “librarians” were rarely trained professionals. Trained librarians served in supervisory roles, and the project took what Ms. Kunz called a “business-like” approach to staffing by hiring the most qualified personnel to ensure smooth operations. (Jeffrey 2001) She insisted that the project’s staff were referred to as “library clerks” rather than “librarians.” (Jeffrey 2001)
In terms of the project’s collections, not only was equal distribution of resources among counties a problem, but so was quality of materials. At the time of Ms. Kunz’s writing, she lamented that less than 15,000 of the project’s 22,000 owned reading materials were of use. (Jeffrey 2001) Nevertheless, Ms. Kunz wrote of these challenges not to declare the project a failure — which it was not — but rather, to provide context for its measurements of success and for the criticism it faced.
Despite its challenges, the legacy of the WPA Pack Horse Library Project can be seen to this day. In 1952, the Kentucky General Assembly passed the Rural Libraries Law, which authorized state aid to local libraries in rural areas. $110,000 was appropriated, with the potential for individual grants of up to $5,000. (Onkst 2012) At the time, 48 Kentucky counties had no library services, only 20% of the rural population had library services, and half of all books in Kentucky Public Libraries were housed in Jefferson County, which is today the most populous county in Kentucky, and home to the city of Louisville, one of the commonwealth’s largest cities. (Onkst 2012) Rural access to libraries was still a challenge, but progress was on the move. Bookmobiles began to spread across the commonwealth, beginning with a donation of 7 bookmobiles for the Library Extension Division by Mary Belknap Gray of Louisville in the late 1940s, and the 1953 donation of 84 bookmobiles by the Friends of Kentucky Libraries. (Onkst 2012)
Since then, Kentucky has led the nation in its bookmobile quantity, aided in part by the Pack Horse Library project legacy, which created a precedent for establishing libraries where none had existed previously, and a precedent for overcoming challenges in access to library services. While it is not clearly known why bookmobiles were an option for library extension work where they were not previously, one could assume that improvements in infrastructure aided their work.
Not only did extension work grow significantly, but public library establishment grew, as well, from 37 public libraries in 1944 to 98 in 1958, with circulation of materials more than tripling during this time. (Onkst 2012) We cannot argue that it was just the WPA project that caused this boom in library expansion, especially because the end of the Depression and WWII created the economic conditions that facilitated such an expansion, however the immense popularity of the project, the impact it had on regional health and hygiene standards, and the subsequent growth in library extension, public libraries, and circulation all speak to the powerful legacy left by the WPA project.
We can also see iterations of the WPA Pack Horse Library Project in subsequent years. Jason Vance writes of modern-day examples, including the Books by Elephant Program in Thailand, in which elephants were used to deliver library materials to remote parts of the Chiang Mai jungles, which were previously unreachable by motorized traffic, especially during rainy seasons. Another similar example can be seen in Northeastern Kenya, in which camels delivered library materials to tent libraries at schools, adult literacy centers, and refugee camps in an area of particularly high illiteracy. What links these programs, according to Vance, is that they existed in remote locations where traditional library services did not exist previously, given an inaccessibility by motorized transportation and general poverty of the region. (Vance 2007)
Little has been written about either of these programs, but the Thailand project did not employ local individuals. Rather, each elephant on the route carried a teacher and health official, in addition to the elephant keeper and a border patrol police official. (AP Archive 2015) The villages targeted rarely had contact with the outside world, so one must consider the villagers’ reception to outside individuals providing previously-unheard-of services. Though it isn’t known if villagers were as suspicious of outside or government interference as mountain families in Eastern Kentucky were, it may have presented an additional challenge. Ultimately, the project was discontinued in 2005 due to the cost and the lack of availability of elephants during their mating season. (Vance 2007)
Similarly, the Camel Library Service Project in Kenya is supported by a charity, Book Aid International, and is overseen by the Kenya National Library Service. (Smith 2005) What links this program with the WPA project more than the Books by Elephant program does, however, is the local nature of the program. The camels carry books from a main library in the region along an established route, which makes it more of a library extension project, similar to the WPA project. Rather than a government agency delivering books to remote regions, this program provides access to a local library that individuals may have not had otherwise, due to the nomadic nature of many individuals in the region and the inhospitable terrain that prevented travel to the main branch. This program is still in existence, despite obstacles in terms of funding and resources, which may suggest that it is a more sustainable model than the Thailand project, and a strong continuation of the legacy of the WPA project.