We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-09-28 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
If you want feather-light, fully open-ear comfort with a mic setup that keeps you aware of your surroundings on every run, choose WIVTAK Open Ear Headphones; if you need maximum playback time, a digital charging case, and a deeper in-ear seal for calls in noisy places, choose Matast 2026. Both are Bluetooth 5.4 wireless headphones with ENC mics, but they solve the "hear your music, still hear the world" problem in two very different ways. One sits on your ear. The other goes in it. That single design choice drives almost everything else below.
• WIVTAK's biggest strength: a true open-ear, air-conduction fit at just 0.28oz per earbud, with physical buttons that don't misfire when you're sweating.
• WIVTAK's biggest trade-off: it's built for awareness first, so it won't isolate you from noise the way a sealed in-ear bud does.
• Matast 2026's biggest strength: up to 60 hours of total playback with the charging case, a 1%–100% LED display, IP7 water resistance, and dual-use mono/binaural mode.
• Matast 2026's biggest trade-off: it's an in-ear hook design, so you get more seal and more bass but less ambient awareness than an open-ear set.
• Pick WIVTAK if you run or cycle in traffic, want to hear cars and conversation, and hate touch controls.
• Pick Matast 2026 if you want the longest possible battery, a visible charge percentage, and a more immersive, bass-forward listen.
The WIVTAK set is an air-conduction, open-ear design. Instead of plugging your ear canal, it rests on the outside of your ear and is held there by an ergonomic ear hook. At 0.28oz it's about as light as this category gets, which matters more than people expect — a hook you notice is a hook you fidget with. The whole point of the open-ear shape is awareness: you get your podcast, your playlist, or a call while traffic, footsteps, and voices still reach you. For running in busy areas, cycling, or walking through a crowd, that's the feature, not a compromise.
Sound is handled by 14.2mm dynamic drivers with a bass-boost layer, and you can switch between three built-in EQ modes without installing an app — deep bass, clear vocals, or balanced. I like that the EQ lives on the buds, because it means you can tune the sound mid-run without pulling out your phone. Controls are physical buttons, which is a genuinely underrated pick for sweaty workouts: no accidental skips, no phantom pauses, no guessing whether your tap registered.
Matast 2026: Who It's For
Matast 2026 takes the other route: an in-ear design with a 45° ear hook for stability, plus three sizes of ear tips (S, M, L) so you can actually dial in the fit. That seal is why it can push deeper bass and block more outside noise. The audio chain is a four-chamber layout with 14.2mm graphene drivers, and the brand claims a wider frequency span than a standard driver — the practical result is a fuller low end than an open-ear set can produce. Four ENC microphones handle calls, and the call-clarity and noise-reduction claims are the headline here: this is the pair you reach for when the call quality is the point.
Battery is where it separates itself. Each bud runs about 8 hours, and the case recharges them six times for up to 60 hours total. A 10-minute USB-C top-up adds roughly 2 hours. The dual LED digital display shows charge from 1% to 100%, which is a small thing that becomes a big thing once you've owned a case with four vague dots. It's IP7 water-resistant thanks to a nano-coating on the internals, so sweat, rain, and splashes are fine. Bluetooth 5.4 covers a stated 15-meter range and standard profiles, and there's a dual-use mode: binaural for stereo, or mono if you want to share one earbud or run solo on a call.
Two things to weigh. Controls are touch-based, and the auto-on hall-effect sensor means opening the case reconnects you instantly — convenient, but touch controls are easier to trigger by accident than buttons. And because it's an in-ear fit, you're trading ambient awareness for isolation. Buy it if you want long battery, a visible charge readout, strong call mics, and a more immersive listen. Skip it if staying aware of your surroundings is non-negotiable.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for battery life → Matast 2026. Up to 60 hours total with the case, plus a 10-minute charge that adds about 2 hours.
• Best for call clarity in noisy environments → Matast 2026. Four ENC mics and an in-ear seal reduce more outside noise around your voice.
• Best for sweaty, high-motion workouts → WIVTAK Open Ear Headphones. Physical buttons prevent touch misfires, and the 0.28oz hook stays put without pressure.
• Best for bass and immersion → Matast 2026. The in-ear seal plus graphene drivers deliver a fuller low end than an open-ear design can.
• Best for charge visibility → Matast 2026. The dual LED display shows battery from 1% to 100%.
• Best for water resistance → Matast 2026. IP7 versus IPX5, so it handles rain and splashes with more margin.
• Best for a slim, forget-it's-there fit → WIVTAK Open Ear Headphones. No ear tips, no canal pressure, nothing to seat just right.
In my opinion, these two aren't really competitors — they're answers to different questions. If your priority is hearing the world while you train, and you want buttons instead of taps, I'd buy the WIVTAK Open Ear Headphones. If your priority is getting through a long week of calls and workouts without hunting for a charger, and you want a visible battery readout, I'd buy the Matast 2026. For most people who run or ride near traffic, I lean WIVTAK, because awareness is a safety feature you can't add later. For everyone else, Matast's battery and mic setup is the safer all-rounder. Both are Bluetooth 5.4 with ENC mics, so neither is a wrong turn — the fit decides it.
how to use wireless headphones mic on pc
Pair the headphones over Bluetooth, then open your computer's sound settings and set the headphones as both the output and the input device. On Windows, that's Settings → System → Sound; on macOS, it's System Settings → Sound → Input. Once selected, any app that uses the mic — a call app, a recorder, a meeting tool — will route audio through the headset mic. Both sets here use Bluetooth 5.4 and connect wirelessly with no jack, so no dongle is needed.
how to use mic on wireless headphones
Just connect the headphones to your phone or computer and pick them as the input device — the mic is built into the earbuds, so there's nothing extra to plug in. On a call, speak normally; ENC processing on both WIVTAK and Matast 2026 is designed to reduce background noise around your voice. If the other person can't hear you, confirm the headset is set as the active input rather than the device's internal mic.
can you use bluetooth headphones as a mic
Yes. Bluetooth headphones with a built-in microphone, like both models here, work as a mic once paired and selected as the input device. The catch is that many Bluetooth headsets switch to a lower-quality mode when the mic is active, so playback can sound thinner during a call. That's a Bluetooth limitation, not a fault of these specific earbuds.
do all bluetooth headphones have a microphone
No. Plenty of Bluetooth headphones are playback-only, with no mic at all. Both products in this comparison do include ENC microphones — WIVTAK for calls and Matast 2026 with four mics for clearer voice pickup — so both can be used for calls, not just music.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: Focal FHPSTAND Headphone Stand vs SENDYAUDIO Apollo Pro, NUBWO HW02 vs acer USB Headset, FAAEAL Monitor Headphone Cable vs Kinboofi KZ ZS10, Carry-on FH50 vs CozyPhones Audio Adapter: Travel Essential