Sorting on Survival Gains under Cost Exposure
with Dominique Araya
Status: Draft coming soon
Abstract. In settings where government-sponsored health care is capacity constrained and access to private providers entails cost exposure, we ask whether patients choose private care based on expected health benefits. We estimate the marginal treatment effects (MTEs) of private surgical care on mortality while allowing for unobserved sorting on gains. Using individual-level hospital discharge data from Chile, we exploit a continuous instrument to identify heterogeneity in the mortality effect of private care along patients' propensity to select into private care. We find negative sorting: cost exposure screens out precisely the patients with the largest expected mortality reductions. Our finding highlights the central role of financial protection in allocating high-risk patients to life-saving medical capacity.
Personalized Childbirth Care and Cesarean Delivery: Evidence from Chile's PAD Program
Summary. Chile has one of the highest cesarean section rates among OECD countries, with especially high rates in the private sector, despite equal reimbursement rates for natural birth and cesarean section. This paper shows that the public-private gap in cesarean delivery is largely attributable to a defining feature of private-style childbirth care: the ability to choose a personalized medical team. The empirical setting is the gradual adoption by Chilean hospitals of Fonasa’s Pago Asociado a un Diagnostico (PAD), a fixed-price bundled payment that allows publicly insured patients to receive childbirth care in participating providers with financial certainty about the final charge. In traditional public hospitals, patients are treated by the medical team on shift. Under PAD, patients can choose their medical team and receive upgraded accommodation. An event-study with staggered difference-in-differences shows that PAD adoption increased cesarean section rates among publicly insured patients in public hospitals by 14.5 percentage points.
The Waiting and Matching Quality Trade-off in Kidney Transplants
Summary. This paper leverages a particular policy in Chile that permits private hospitals that procure deceased donor organs from remote areas to retain one of the two kidneys they receive, prioritizing their own patients. As a result, patients in need of kidney transplantation face different waiting times and matching quality between public and private hospitals: the national list has a longer wait time but better matching quality due to a greater market "thickness" for available kidneys and transplant candidates, whereas the private hospital list has a shorter wait time but lower matching quality. I quantify the tradeoff by comparing the life-years from transplantation between the two sectors, using distance to dialysis centers as an instrumental variable for the binary choice between dialysis and transplantation.