The proposed BOVText support four task(text detection, recognition, tracking, spotting), but mainly includes two tasks:

  • Video Frames Detection.

  • Video Frames Recognition.

  • Video Text Tracking.

  • End to End Text Spotting in Videos.

MOTP (Multiple Object Tracking Precision)[1], MOTA (Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy) and IDF1[3,4] as the three important metrics are used to evaluate task1 (text tracking) for MMVText. In particular, we make use of the publicly available py-motmetrics library (https://github.com/cheind/py-motmetrics) for the establishment of the evaluation metric.

Word recognition evaluation is case-insensitive, and accent-insensitive. The transcription '###' or "#1" is special, as it is used to define text areas that are unreadable. During the evaluation, such areas will not be taken into account: a method will not be penalised if it does not detect these words, while a method that detects them will not get any better score.

Task 3 for Text Tracking Evaluation

The objective of this task is to obtain the location of words in the video in terms of their affine bounding boxes. The task requires that words are both localised correctly in every frame and tracked correctly over the video sequence. Please output the json file as following:

Output.├-Cls10_Program_Cls10_Program_video11.json│-Cls10_Program_Cls10_Program_video12.json│-Cls10_Program_Cls10_Program_video13.json├-Cls10_Program_Cls10_Program_video14.json│-Cls10_Program_Cls10_Program_video15.json│-Cls10_Program_Cls10_Program_video16.json│-Cls11_Movie_Cls11_Movie_video17.json│-Cls11_Movie_Cls11_Movie_video18.json│-Cls11_Movie_Cls11_Movie_video19.json│-Cls11_Movie_Cls11_Movie_video20.json│-Cls11_Movie_Cls11_Movie_video21.json│-...

And then cd Evaluation_Protocol/Task1_VideoTextTracking, run following script:

python evaluation.py --groundtruths ./Test/Annotation --tests ./output

Task 4 for Text Spotting Evaluation

Please output the json file like task 3.

cd Evaluation_Protocol/Task2_VideoTextSpotting, run following script:

python evaluation.py --groundtruths ./Test/Annotation --tests ./output



[1] Dendorfer, P., Rezatofighi, H., Milan, A., Shi, J., Cremers, D., Reid, I., Roth, S., Schindler, K., & Leal-Taixe, L. (2019). CVPR19 Tracking and Detection Challenge: How crowded can it get?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.04567.

[2] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.

[3] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.

[4] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.

[5] Anand Mishra, Karteek Alahari, and CV Jawahar. Image retrieval using textual cues. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3040–3047, 2013.

[6] Oleksii Sidorov, Ronghang Hu, Marcus Rohrbach, and Amanpreet Singh. Textcaps: a dataset for image captioning with reading comprehension. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 742–758. Springer, 2020.

[7] Minesh Mathew, Dimosthenis Karatzas, C. V. Jawahar, "DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images", arXiv:2007.00398 [cs.CV], WACV 2021

[8] Minesh Mathew, Ruben Tito, Dimosthenis Karatzas, R. Manmatha, C.V. Jawahar, "Document Visual Question Answering Challenge 2020", arXiv:2008.08899 [cs.CV], DAS 2020