Vi Caller Tune App 'LINK' Download

That is not an option that is available for customization your iPhone. This article explains more about ringtones you can use: Use tones and ringtones with your iPhone or iPad - Apple Support. But a sound for your callers to hear isn't something Apple offers.

Callertunes are any tune or a particular song callers can hear when they call a number instead of the default dial tone. With Vi, access millions of tunes/songs, preview the callertunes and set the latest songs as caller tunes. For example, if you set a song as a caller tune for your callers, they will hear that song when they call you until you answer the phone. This way you can add a little zest of your personality for your callers instead of the boring ringing caller tone.

Vi Caller Tune App Download

Download Zip 🔥 https://urllie.com/2y5IBV 🔥

Vi users can choose any song with the "Set caller tune" option from Vi's wide collection of ad-free music and use their favorite caller tune song for their callers. Music spanning 20+ languages across genres like romance, melody, classical, bhakti, etc. is available via Hungama Music in the Vi App to set the best caller tune song.

You can greet your callers with your name as your caller tune. For instance: Search for a specific name and select a tune like "Thank you for calling (your name) please wait while they answer your call" These name caller tunes can be set in a language of your choice to please callers in a language they prefer or understand better.

Conveniently inform your callers of your status with profile tunes when they call you during your away time. This way when you cannot attend a call, your callers will be aware that you are busy at the moment. Enjoying a holiday, busy working, having a peaceful meal, or low on phone battery, choose an appropriate profile tune to alert your callers.

This service allows you to set a song, funny message, your name, music, or any other sound as your ring-back tone for caller tune for your callers. These caller tunes can be set in different ways for all your callers.

There is a need to attract first time voluntary blood donors and retain them as repeat donors because these are the safest donors. The WHO has a target of requiring all countries to get 100% of all donated blood from voluntary, unpaid donors by 2020 [27]. Thus, the National Blood Service Ghana has been exploring opportunities to increase voluntary blood donation. In a qualitative study to explore how journalists, clinicians, and blood donors could team up to promote blood donation in Ghana, the potential of using mobile phones caller tunes was identified [11].

Although we could not identify a single study that had used TAM to evaluate intention to adopt caller tunes to promote blood donation, TAM constructs such as perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitudes to technologies, and intention to use technologies is particularly applicable to this study because of their validation in health information system environments [31].

The survey questionnaires required participants to answer questions on TAM constructs related to blood donation and intention to use mobile phone caller tunes to promote blood donation, medication adherence, and patient reporting of ADRs as part of a larger project. The focus of this study is on the blood donation component. Data collection occurred from October 2016 to December 2016.

We hypothesized that perceived ease of use will have a positive effect on attitudes to caller tunes. All the path coefficients were positive. However, other than nonblood donors with no caller tunes, which was statistically significant (P=.001; see Figure 5,Table 8), all the other models had statistically nonsignificant relationship between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of caller tunes.

Our hypothesis that perceived usefulness will have positive effects on intention to use caller tunes among blood donors with or without caller tunes was supported for all the path models (Table 8). Perceived usefulness had significant effect on intention to use caller tunes among blood donors with caller tunes (beta=.293, P

Our hypothesis was that attitude will have positive effects on intention to use caller tunes among blood donors or nonblood donors with or without caller tunes. Attitudes had significant effect on intention to use caller tunes among blood donors without caller tunes (beta=.351, P

We hypothesized that making caller tunes free to download will have positive effects on intention to use caller tunes among blood donors or nonblood donors with or without caller tunes. The effect of free of cost caller tunes on the intention to download and use for blood donation was statistically significant (beta=.169, P

Perceived usefulness and attitudes to caller tunes explained 10.7% of the variance in intention to use caller tunes for blood donation among blood donors with caller tunes, with the variance in intention increasing slightly to 11.2% when free to download was added to the model (Table 9).

Among blood donors with no caller tunes, perceived usefulness, attitudes to using caller tunes for blood donation, and free of cost explained 21.1% of the variance in intention. Without free of cost, the variance in intention was 19.7%. The greatest variance in intention was obtained among nonblood donors, with perceived usefulness, attitudes, and free of cost explaining 34.4% and 47.4% of the variances in intention to use caller tunes among those with caller tunes and those without caller tunes, respectively.

Free of cost reduced the variance in intention to download and use caller tunes for blood donation only in the case of nonblood donors with caller tunes (from 34.7%-34.4%), while slightly increasing the variances in intention for blood donors with caller tunes (from 10.7%-11.2%), blood donors without caller tunes (from 19.7%-21.1%), as well as nonblood donors without caller tunes (46.2%-47.4%). Results for the research models without free of cost have not been reported.

Compared with perceived usefulness, attitudes to using caller tunes for blood donation had the stronger effects on intention to use caller tunes for promoting blood donation (Table 9), with the model for nonblood donors without caller tunes having the largest effect (55%), followed by that for blood donors with caller tunes (39.2%).

With most of the fit indices within the recommended values, there is likelihood of good fit [64]. However, RMSEA value for blood donors with no caller tune was 0, indicating exact model fit to the data [66]. This is a rare finding in surveys and might have research implication for the specified model for blood donors with no caller tunes. With RMSEA P value of .802 for this model (Table 7) based on 90% CI, our data appear to have good fit to the model. At samples sizes of at least 200 such as in this study, the use of 90% CI for estimating RMSEA provides comparable results with 95% CI [67]. RMSEA values of 0.05 to 0.08 indicate close fit [68], thus making the model for nonblood donors with caller tunes the only one that appears not to fit the data. This model also had statistically significant RMSEA (P=.046) and had NFI, IFI, Tucker Lewis index, and CFI values outside those recommended, suggesting that it may have implications for further research.

This study did not explore actual use of caller tunes for promoting blood donation because caller tunes for promoting blood donation are yet to be created. Nevertheless, our study is a necessary step for designing behavioral interventions using caller tunes to increase the number of first time donors and to encourage existing donors to donate regularly. It was surprising that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness (Table 9) explained the greatest variance in attitudes to using caller tunes for blood donation among nonblood donors with no caller tunes (55%). However, although perceived usefulness significantly impacted the attitudes to using caller tunes among all four groups of participants, perceived ease of use significantly impacted the attitudes of only nonblood donors with no caller tunes (P=.04). This finding may be because nonblood donors with no caller tunes may be unaware of the ease with which they could get caller tunes onto their phones for promoting blood donation. Thus, should the caller tunes on blood donation be created, more efforts or promotion would be needed to positively influence the attitudes of nonblood donors without caller tunes.

This finding suggests that efforts to promote uptake of caller tunes for blood donation should particularly target nonblood donors who do not already use caller tunes. Given that making caller tunes free to download was statistically significant in increasing intention to use caller tunes among only nonblood donors with no caller tunes, intervention designers would need to ensure that caller tunes for promoting blood donation become free. For example, affordability was found to be a statistically significant predictor of intention to use portable coagulometer devices for self-testing of the international normalized ratio among outpatients attending outpatient anticoagulation services [33].

A surprising finding of this study is that making caller tunes free to download appears to have significant positive effect on intention among only nonblood donors with no caller tunes. Conversely, it had negative effect on intention among blood donors, although the effects were nonsignificant. One reason might be that donors were already donating blood and those nondonors were already using caller tunes. Thus, free download did not have a significant impact on these types of participants. Another potential explanation for this finding may be that blood donors may be more willing to promote blood donation by paying the current cost of caller tunes (which is usually about 10 cents per month). For nonblood donors with no caller tunes, cost may be a factor in their current nonuse of caller tunes. 17dc91bb1f