How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
If you want deep, adjustable bass from a big over-ear driver with a wired fallback, choose Uliptz Headphones Over Ear; if you need earbuds that stay locked in your ears through sweat, rain and long workouts, choose Matast Ear Buds.
• Uliptz Headphones Over Ear — biggest strength: a 40 mm dynamic driver paired with six switchable EQ modes, including a dedicated deep-bass setting, plus 65 hours of playtime. Biggest trade-off: it's a full-size over-ear headphone — 180 g on your head, no earhooks, and no waterproof rating mentioned.
• Matast Ear Buds — biggest strength: a secure earhook design with IP7 water protection and a 13 mm driver tuned for deep bass, all in a package you can wear while sprinting. Biggest trade-off: 10 hours per charge from the buds themselves, and the case is what gets you to the 50-hour total.
• Who Uliptz is for: anyone who wants bass they can shape, long marathon sessions at a desk or on a plane, and the safety net of a 3.5 mm cable.
• Who Matast is for: runners, gym-goers and commuters who need buds that won't slip, survive sweat, and make their voice clear on calls.
• The bass angle, in one line: Uliptz gives you more bass options; Matast gives you bass that survives motion.
The Uliptz set is built around one idea: give the listener control. Inside each cup sits a 40 mm dynamic driver covering a 20 Hz–20 kHz range, and the EQ button cycles through six sound modes — balanced, deep bass, crisp treble and more. That matters more than it sounds. Most budget headphones pick one tuning and live with it; here you can push the low end forward for hip-hop or electronic, then flip back to something flatter for podcasts or calls. If you're someone who notices that one pair of headphones sounds great with some genres and muddy with others, this is the design that respects that.
Comfort and battery are the other two pillars. At 180 g with memory foam cushions, an adjustable metal slider headband and rotatable earcups, the fit is meant to adapt to different head shapes rather than clamp down. The memory foam also filters out a good chunk of ambient noise passively — Uliptz claims over 50% of surrounding sound — which is useful on a train or in a shared office without any active noise cancelling involved. Then there's the 65-hour average battery life, with a 10-minute top-up giving roughly 4 hours of playback if you're caught short. Charging to full takes about 2.5 hours.
The details that make it flexible: Bluetooth 5.2 with a 10-metre range, multipoint pairing so it holds two devices at once (handy if you're watching something on a laptop and a call comes in on your phone), a built-in mic, a foldable frame, and — the part I like most — a 3.5 mm jack. When the battery dies, you plug in the included cable and keep listening. There's also a 248 ms audio latency figure worth knowing about; that's fine for music and casual video, but competitive gamers chasing frame-perfect sync may find it noticeable.
Skip it if you need earbuds for running, sweat-heavy training or rain. Nothing in the spec sheet suggests water resistance, and a 180 g over-ear headphone is the wrong tool for a treadmill. It's also worth checking the current price on Amazon before deciding, since that's the one thing this comparison can't tell you.
The Matast B02 is a sports earbud, and every spec bends toward that. The shape is the giveaway: an earhook design rather than a stem or a plain in-ear bud, with three sizes of ear caps in the box so you can dial in the seal. If you've ever had a bud pop out mid-run, you know why that matters. The IP7 nano-coating handles sweat, splashes and rain, which is the difference between a pair you can train in and a pair you baby.
Sound-wise you get a 13 mm dynamic driver — noticeably large for a bud — and Matast tunes it for powerful bass with a mellow midrange and clear treble. If deep bass is your priority, that's the spec to care about: bigger drivers generally move more air, and the low end is where you'll feel it during a workout. On top of that, four ENC microphones passively cancel around 80% of background noise on calls, so the person on the other end hears you rather than the gym.
Battery is where you need to read carefully. The buds themselves run about 10 hours per charge; the charging case extends total playtime to 50 hours, and a Type-C top-up takes 1.5 hours. Dual LED displays on the case show both the case's remaining power and the buds' charging progress, which is a genuinely useful touch — no guessing whether you're about to head out with dead buds.
Skip it if you want the biggest possible soundstage, user-adjustable EQ, or a wired backup. There's no 3.5 mm jack here, no EQ modes, and the bass character is fixed by the tuning rather than something you can dial in.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for deep bass you can customise → Uliptz Headphones Over Ear. Six EQ modes including a dedicated deep-bass setting, driven by a 40 mm driver.
• Best for bass during运动 — sorry, during workouts → Matast Ear Buds. A 13 mm driver in a sealed, earhook-secured fit that won't shift when you move.
• Best for battery life → Uliptz Headphones Over Ear. 65 hours on one charge versus 10 hours per charge on the Matast buds (50 hours with the case).
• Best for running, gym and rain → Matast Ear Buds. IP7 waterproofing and earhooks; the Uliptz sheet lists no water resistance.
• Best for long desk or travel sessions → Uliptz Headphones Over Ear. 180 g, memory foam cushions, foldable frame and passive sound isolation for planes and open offices.
• Best for clear calls in noisy places → Matast Ear Buds. Four ENC mics cancelling roughly 80% of background noise.
• Best for never running out of power → Uliptz Headphones Over Ear. The 3.5 mm cable means wired listening even at 0% battery.
• Best for low-latency listening → Matast Ear Buds, mainly because the Uliptz sheet lists 248 ms of audio latency, which is a real consideration for gaming and rhythm games.
If I had to pick one, I'd take the Uliptz Headphones Over Ear. In my opinion it wins on the thing this comparison is about — bass — because six EQ modes and a 40 mm driver let you actually shape the low end instead of accepting whatever tuning you're given. The 65-hour battery, multipoint pairing and 3.5 mm fallback make it the more versatile object to own. That said, if your listening happens while moving — running, lifting, cycling in the rain — I'd recommend the Matast Ear Buds without hesitation, because no amount of EQ helps a headphone that isn't waterproof and doesn't stay on your head. Buy for your actual routine, not for the spec sheet.
what headphones have deep bass
Look for a large dynamic driver and, ideally, a bass-focused EQ mode. The Uliptz over-ear uses a 40 mm dynamic driver and includes a dedicated deep-bass setting among its six EQ modes, which is about as direct an answer as a spec sheet can give.
what are earbuds with good bass
Bass in earbuds comes down to driver size and a proper seal. The Matast buds use a 13 mm dynamic driver — large for an in-ear — and ship with three ear cap sizes so you can get a tight fit, which is what actually lets you hear the low end.
what is bass in headphones
Bass is the low-frequency part of the audio range, roughly the bottom of the 20 Hz–20 kHz span both of these products cover. It's the thump and rumble you feel in hip-hop, electronic and film soundtracks, and it's the first thing most listeners notice when comparing two pairs.
what are headphones with good bass
It depends on whether you want adjustability or portability. The Uliptz over-ear gives you switchable EQ modes including deep bass with a 40 mm driver; the Matast buds give you a bass-tuned 13 mm driver in a sweatproof, stay-put design. Neither is objectively "better" — it's about whether you're sitting still or moving.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: DOQAUS Headphones Over Ear vs Kelazola Headset V5.3, otinsile Open Ear buds vs SUPVOL 2: Bluetooth Headphones for, PowerLocus Headphones vs Rydohi Headphones Over Ear