INDEX:
Trump:
Federalized the California National Guard without governor consent.
Declared a “crime emergency” in Washington, D.C. to take over the local police.
Threatened to extend federalized control to Chicago and New York.
Critics argue this undermines the Tenth Amendment and civilian control of policing.
Hitler (1933–1934):
Used the Reichstag Fire Decree (Feb. 1933) to suspend civil liberties and justify federal takeovers of local police across Germany.
Militarized policing and replaced state police with the Gestapo, loyal directly to him.
Justified actions under the guise of national “emergency” and public safety.
Parallel: Both invoke emergency/security pretexts to override local autonomy and bring coercive forces directly under central control.
Trump:
Asserted power to federalize the National Guard for immigration enforcement and protest suppression.
Courts have pushed back (e.g., Newsom v. Trump), but appeals are ongoing.
Hitler:
Absorbed state police forces into the SS and Gestapo.
Consolidated the SA (Brownshirts) under his command and then purged rivals (Night of the Long Knives, 1934).
Erased boundaries between federal and state enforcement.
Parallel: Both weaken state/independent military structures and centralize under one leader.
Trump:
Faces active judicial checks—federal courts have ruled against his Guard deployments.
Congress retains power to defund or block actions, though partisan alignment complicates this.
Hitler:
Exploited Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution (emergency powers) with little judicial resistance.
The Enabling Act (March 1933) transferred legislative powers from parliament to Hitler’s cabinet, effectively eliminating constitutional limits.
Difference: U.S. constitutional checks (courts, Congress, states) are still functioning, while Weimar’s collapsed.
Trump:
Frames Democratic-run cities (LA, DC, Chicago, NYC) as “lawless” and justifies federal intervention.
Appeals to a “law and order” base, portraying local officials as incapable or disloyal.
Hitler:
Framed communists, Jews, and Weimar politicians as internal enemies sabotaging Germany.
Used propaganda to delegitimize state governments and justify replacing them with Nazi loyalists.
Parallel: Both undermine trust in local governance as a prelude to central takeover.
Similarities:
Use of emergency pretexts to expand control.
Attempts to bypass or override state/local autonomy.
Centralization of armed and police power under executive authority.
Rhetorical attacks on “disloyal” local officials to justify intervention.
Differences:
U.S. system has stronger institutional checks (courts, states, Congress).
Hitler dismantled those checks rapidly (Reichstag Fire Decree, Enabling Act).
Trump pushes boundaries, but so far has faced judicial and political resistance.
👉 In short: Trump’s moves echo early stages of Hitler’s consolidation of force—especially federalizing local police/militias and invoking emergency powers. The difference lies in whether U.S. institutions remain strong enough to resist a similar collapse.
Would you like me to create a timeline graphic comparing Trump’s 2025 actions step-by-step with Hitler’s 1933–34 rise to police/military control? That might make the parallels clearer.
Trump is setting himself up to be a dictator for the rest of his and his family's existence.
• Remove all those with expertise or knowledge and replace them with extreme sycophants.
• Example: Reports indicate Trump’s 2025 plans include purging career officials in favor of loyalists
• Do away with all agencies and Congressional allocation that even think of helping anyone besides wealthy male Americans.
• Example: Trump allies have discussed dismantling the administrative state and eliminating agencies like the Department of Education.
• Destroy any power the courts may have over him.
• Example: Trump has repeatedly challenged judicial oversight, sought immunity from prosecution, and suggested using the DOJ against opponents ,
• Create enough opposition that there will be violent riots in the streets; with that, he will declare martial law and call out the various services to put it down.
• Example: Trump encouraged unrest after the 2020 election, and reports suggest he considered invoking martial law to stay in power.
• Start jailing all of his opposition.
• Example: Trump has repeatedly suggested prosecuting political opponents, including calls to “lock up” Biden and others.
• Destroy free speech and limit allowed vocabulary. He is digaltly striping whole secetion of contnet that is the equivilent of book burn
• Example: Trump has repeatedly called for restrictions on the press, proposed expanding defamation laws to sue journalists, and threatened media outlets critical of him (Source: The Washington Post).
• Take over other countries, starting with easy ones like Greenland, Panama, and later Canada and all those countries that try to protect Canada.
• Example: Trump previously floated buying Greenland and has suggested aggressive foreign policies.
• Use the military and law enforcement as personal enforcers.
• Example: Trump has promised to use the National Guard in blue cities without permission, and he sought military force against protesters in 2020 .
• Weaponize the IRS and DOJ against enemies.
• Example: Trump’s team has floated using the DOJ to prosecute critics and businesses that oppose him (Source: Rolling Stone).
• Overturn election results and dismantle democracy.
• Example: Trump and his allies attempted to overturn the 2020 election, and Project 2025 suggests further election control measures.
• Rewrite or eliminate the Constitution.
• Example: Trump has explicitly called for “terminating” parts of the Constitution that prevent him from returning to power
• Make it illegal to protest against him.
• Example: Trump’s allies have pushed for laws limiting protests, and his administration proposed labeling protesters as terrorists (Source: NPR).
• Replace democracy with permanent rule by his family.
• Example: Trump has repeatedly joked (or suggested) that he should stay in power beyond two terms, and his family has taken over GOP leadership roles (Source: Vanity Fair).
Removing Experts and Installing Sycophants
Authoritarian leaders often purge government institutions of independent thinkers and replace them with loyalists who will not challenge their decisions. Trump has already signaled his intent to do this in a second term. His allies have drafted plans, including Project 2025, which details the dismissal of tens of thousands of federal workers and replacing them with Trump loyalists.
Historically, this mirrors how autocrats like Vladimir Putin in Russia and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey consolidated power—by ensuring that the military, courts, and bureaucratic apparatus were staffed only by those who would not oppose them. The infamous “Night of the Long Knives” in Nazi Germany saw Hitler purge his government of perceived threats and rivals, securing absolute control over state institutions.
Source: Axios
Dismantling Government Agencies That Provide Services to the Public
Trump and his conservative allies, particularly those aligned with Project 2025, have explicitly stated their desire to gut agencies like the Department of Education, the EPA, and the IRS—agencies that provide oversight and services that benefit average Americans. By doing so, the government would become an institution serving only the interests of the wealthy and corporations.
A historical comparison can be made to Chile under Augusto Pinochet (1973-1990). After a U.S.-backed coup, Pinochet dismantled many government programs that helped the working class, slashing social benefits while enriching the elite.
Source: Project 2025 website
Destroying the Courts’ Power Over Him
Trump has already argued that he should have total immunity from prosecution—even for crimes committed while in office. If re-elected, he will likely appoint even more extreme judges who will insulate him from accountability.
This is a classic move from strongmen throughout history. Erdogan in Turkey, Orbán in Hungary, and Putin in Russia have all used court-packing and judicial control to shield themselves from legal consequences. Trump has already reshaped the Supreme Court and lower courts to favor his policies, and a second term would allow him to complete this takeover.
Source: New York Times
Creating Chaos to Justify Martial Law
Trump’s rhetoric—repeatedly claiming that political violence is inevitable if he loses—suggests that he may welcome or incite violence in order to justify extraordinary measures like declaring martial law. Reports from former officials show that during his final days in office, Trump seriously considered using the military to stay in power after losing the 2020 election.
In history, Hitler used the Reichstag Fire in 1933 as a pretext to declare emergency powers and dismantle democratic institutions. Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines (1972) did the same, using supposed threats to national security to justify martial law and extend his rule.
Source: The Guardian
Jailing Political Opponents:
Trump has already floated the idea of prosecuting his opponents, including Joe Biden, and has made clear his intent for “retribution” if he returns to power. His allies, like Steve Bannon, have openly talked about mass arrests of political enemies.
Historical precedent: In Turkey, Erdogan arrested thousands of political opponents and journalists following a failed coup attempt in 2016. In Russia, Putin imprisons and poisons opposition leaders, most notably Alexei Navalny, who died in prison. A second Trump term could see DOJ investigations weaponized to eliminate opposition voices.
Source: CNN
Destroying Free Speech and Restricting Vocabulary
Trump has long attacked the free press, calling the media the “enemy of the people” and advocating for expanded defamation laws to sue journalists. His allies have even proposed laws that would restrict certain topics from being discussed in schools and media—a move reminiscent of authoritarian language control.
Historical examples:
• George Orwell’s “Newspeak” in 1984 was based on real regimes that controlled vocabulary to limit dissent.
• China’s Communist Party censors language and bans words that could be used against the government.
• Fascist Italy under Mussolini banned words that were considered “anti-Italian” or “foreign propaganda.”
Source: Washington Post
Using the Military and Law Enforcement as Personal Enforcers
Trump has already promised to deploy the National Guard into cities run by Democrats without their consent—a move that would amount to using federal forces as his personal security apparatus.
This mirrors the use of military force in authoritarian regimes such as:
• Mussolini’s Blackshirts in Italy, who enforced his rule through intimidation.
• Putin’s security forces, which suppress opposition rallies and maintain his grip on power.
• Philippines’ Duterte,
The administration hides injustice by eliminating oversight:
Fired 17 inspectors general
Removed the head of the Office of Government Ethics
Ousted the leader of the National Archives
Banned the Associated Press from the White House
Each cut targets truth-telling institutions that hold power accountable.
In policing, it shut down the National Law Enforcement Accountability Database — killing transparency on officer misconduct.
No records = no accountability = no justice.
The steps are not sequential and will be initiated all simultaneously, with more pressure on those that are working.
1. Matt Gaetz – Attorney General
• Background: Gaetz, a Republican congressman from Florida, is known for his staunch support of Trump and his confrontational style.
• Controversies:
• Past Investigations: Gaetz has been under federal investigation for alleged sex trafficking and other misconduct, though no charges have been filed.
• Partisan Concerns: His nomination has raised alarms within the GOP, with some members questioning his ability to secure Senate confirmation.
2. Pete Hegseth – Secretary of Defense
• Background: Hegseth is a Fox News host and former Army National Guard officer.
• Controversies:
• Sexual Assault Allegations: Hegseth faces a sexual assault allegation from 2017, which he settled under a nondisclosure agreement.
• Lack of Government Experience: Critics point to his limited experience in government roles, questioning his preparedness for leading the Department of Defense.
3. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – Secretary of Health and Human Services
• Background: Kennedy is an environmental attorney and known vaccine skeptic.
• Controversies: (see below for more detail)
• Anti-Vaccine Stance: His skepticism toward vaccines has drawn criticism from public health experts, who argue that his views could undermine public health initiatives.
• Mixed Reactions: While some praise his advocacy for healthier food and transparency, others express concern over his suitability for the role.
4. Tulsi Gabbard – Director of National Intelligence
• Background: Gabbard is a former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii.
• Controversies:
• Foreign Policy Positions: Her past support for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and comments perceived as pro-Russia have raised concerns about her alignment with U.S. intelligence objectives.
• Bipartisan Skepticism: Both Republicans and Democrats have questioned her qualifications for overseeing the intelligence community.
5. Chris Wright – Secretary of Energy
• Background: Wright is the CEO of Liberty Energy, a company involved in oil and gas production.
• Controversies:
• Climate Change Views: Wright denies the existence of a climate crisis and is an outspoken critic of climate change initiatives, which has drawn backlash from environmentalists and climate-conscious Republicans.
• Industry Ties: His deep connections to the fossil fuel industry raise concerns about potential conflicts of interest in leading the Department of Energy.
6. Marco Rubio – Secretary of State
• Background: Rubio is a Republican senator from Florida with experience in foreign policy.
• Controversies:
• Pro-Israel Stance: His strong support for Israel has caused concern among Arab American and Muslim communities who had hoped for a more balanced approach to Middle East policy.
• Conservative Backlash: Some conservatives have expressed dissatisfaction with his appointment, questioning his alignment with Trump’s foreign policy vision.
7. Dr Oz Dr. Mehmet: Oz’s nomination to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has raised several concerns:
Promotion of Unproven Treatments: Dr. Oz has been criticized for endorsing products and treatments lacking scientific validation. For instance, he promoted hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, despite insufficient evidence of its efficacy.
Dissemination of Misinformation: His television show has been noted for presenting medical advice not always supported by solid evidence. A 2014 study in the British Medical Journal found that less than half of the recommendations on “The Dr. Oz Show” were backed by credible evidence.
. Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Oz has faced scrutiny over potential conflicts, such as promoting products from which he might benefit financially. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he advocated for hydroxychloroquine while holding investments in companies producing the drug.
' Lack of Governmental Experience: While a skilled cardiothoracic surgeon and media personality, Dr. Oz lacks experience managing large governmental organizations like CMS, which oversees healthcare for over half the U.S. population.
. Professional Criticism: His peers have questioned his commitment to evidence-based medicine. In 2015, a group of physicians called for his removal from Columbia University’s faculty, citing concerns over his promotion of unproven treatments.
RFK jr. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. derives his health-related information from a variety of sources, many of which are considered controversial and have been widely discredited by the scientific community.
Children’s Health Defense: Kennedy chairs this organization, which he joined in 2015. The group has been instrumental in promoting debunked theories about vaccines, including the false claim that vaccines cause autism. Despite his assertions that he is not anti-vaccine but rather advocates for rigorous testing, Kennedy has shown consistent opposition to various immunizations and has encouraged resistance to public health guidelines.
Collaborations with Discredited Figures: Kennedy has collaborated with individuals known for spreading misinformation. He has appeared in online conversations with the discredited British former doctor Andrew Wakefield, the anti-vaccination activist Del Bigtree, and the conspiracy theorist Rashid Buttar. Kennedy is listed as executive producer of “Vaxxed II: The People’s Truth,” the 2019 sequel to Wakefield’s and Bigtree’s anti-vaccination documentary “Vaxxed.”
Publications and Media Appearances: Kennedy has authored books and articles that promote his views on health issues. In 2014, his book “Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak” was published, advocating for the removal of mercury-based preservatives from vaccines. He has also been a keynote speaker at events such as the anti-vaccination AutismOne / Generation Rescue conference.
The little man in Trump's head telling him what to say and do.
Next time, he has stated he will be a dictator from day one.
TRUMP'S SELF IMAGE.
Trump is following Hitler's playbook item by item. His ex-wife said that he had a copy of Hitler's speeches by his bedside. Remember, Hitler came to power in a democracy.
Incitement and Political Actions:
• Incited insurrection at the Capitol and spread false claims about election fraud.
• Impeached twice, first over Ukraine and then for the Capitol riot.
• Refused to concede the 2020 election; delayed the transition.
• Tried to pressure Ukraine for dirt on Joe Biden and fired FBI Director James Comey.
• Pandemic Mismanagement:
• Mishandled COVID-19 response; downplayed the virus publicly while acknowledging its severity privately.
• Suggested unproven treatments and dismissed mask-wearing, contributing to preventable deaths.
• Civil and Human Rights Issues:
• Separated migrant children from families and lost track of some in the system.
• Banned transgender military service and attempted to restrict Muslim immigration.
• Labeled Black Lives Matter a “symbol of hate”; called nations like Haiti “shithole countries.”
• International Relations and Military:
• Withdrawn from Paris Climate Agreement, Iran Nuclear Deal, and Trans-Pacific Partnership.
• Alienated NATO allies; took Putin’s word over U.S. intelligence and reduced troop support in Syria.
• Supported autocratic leaders and praised their actions, such as those of North Korea’s Kim Jong Un.
• Domestic Economic Policies and Records:
• Presided over a weak jobs record and increased the national debt by $8 trillion.
• Signed tax cuts favoring the wealthiest; initiated trade war with China, harming farmers.
• Claimed victories on economic issues without meaningful policy support or follow-through.
• Behavioral and Ethical Issues:
• Engaged in unpresidential behaviors, such as attacking officials and allies on Twitter.
• Exploited public office for personal gain, charging Secret Service at Trump properties.
• Spread misinformation about election fraud, COVID-19, and claimed public credit for actions.
• Environmental and Regulatory Rollbacks:
• Overturned environmental protections, allowing harmful pollutants and deregulated drilling on federal lands.
• Criticized for a slow and insufficient response to natural disasters like Hurricane Maria.
• Military Action Against Opponents: Donald Trump has suggested using military force against Americans opposing his candidacy, something unprecedented in U.S. history, but it is what Hitler and other Dictators have done. Hiter had a particular unit of the Military for this purpose it was called the SS
• Enemies Within: Trump has framed Democrats as internal enemies, even hinting at the possibility of National Guard intervention during the election. Again, a job for the SS.
• Anti-Democratic Sentiments: Trump continues to undermine the 2020 election results, embrace voter fraud conspiracies, and align with authoritarian figures like Vladimir Putin. Remember, Hitler rose to power in a democracy. We are not protected by our vote from a dictator after an authoritarian is elected. Almost 50% of American voters want a leader who has complete control. Once an Authority is accepted, they no longer have to make any choices. The Authority is always proper.
• Escalating Threats: He has openly vowed retribution against political opponents, a key focus of his current campaign, presenting voters with a vision of a less democratic government. He has repeatedly praised dictators of other countries: Putin in Russia, Xi Jinping - in China, Kim Jong-il - in North Korea, and Viktor Orbán -the Hungarian prime minister, an autocrat.
• Impact on the Election: Trump’s rhetoric is causing concern, especially among moderates and independents. His threats are also seen as a political opportunity for opponents like Kamala Harris, who are highlighting the dangers to democracy posed by Trump’s statements.
• Campaign Responses: Kamala Harris has made Trump’s threats a central theme in her campaign, using video footage of his comments to warn about the potential consequences of his re-election.
• Widespread Alarm: Figures like General Mark Milley who has stated that Trump is a Fascist. And Olivia Troye have expressed fears for their safety and future, reflecting the broader anxiety over Trump’s rhetoric and potential actions if he returns to power.
• Historical Context: Trump’s promises of retribution, like his calls to jail Hillary Clinton in 2016, have now become even more pronounced and central to his message. His rhetoric of vengeance has intensified since his legal troubles began, painting himself as a figure of “retribution” for his supporters.
Increase in tariffs on Mexican manufacturing: The people trying to get across our Southen borders are desperate financially. Killing jobs in Mexico and Central America will only send more of them north and will press them into drug trades out of desperation.
A picture of some liberal critics of Trump after his election.
• Trump’s Claim: The 2020 election was stolen.
• Truth: Multiple audits, recounts, and court cases found no evidence of widespread voter fraud that would have altered the election outcome. Key advisors, including Attorney General William Barr, Vice President Mike Pence, and others, told Trump the fraud claims were baseless.
2. Leading in Polls
• Trump’s Claim: He’s leading in the polls “by a lot.”
• Truth: Polling results vary, but claims of an overwhelming lead have not been substantiated by non-partisan sources. Polls often show a close race or slight lead for various candidates.
3. Record Inflation Under Biden
• Trump’s Claim: Inflation under President Biden has been the worst in history.
• Truth: Inflation has risen since the pandemic, exacerbated by global supply chain issues and other factors, but it hasn’t reached historic highs. Inflation rates were higher in the 1970s and early 1980s.
4. Conviction on Felonies and Business Fraud
• Trump’s Claim: These are part of a “plot” by partisan Democrats.
• Truth: Trump was convicted on charges related to falsifying business records, lying to banks, and defamation. Courts found him liable based on evidence, not partisan bias.
5. Windmills Cause Cancer and Kill Whales
• Trump’s Claim: Windmills cause cancer and kill whales.
• Truth: There is no scientific basis for the claim that wind turbines cause cancer. While concerns have been raised about offshore wind farms and marine life, there’s no established link between wind farms and whale deaths.
6. Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, “Eating Dogs and Cats”
• Trump’s Claim: Illegal Haitian migrants are “eating dogs and cats.”
• Truth: The Haitians in Springfield are in the country legally, and local officials, including the Republican governor, debunked this claim as untrue.
7. Largest Inauguration Crowd Ever
• Trump’s Claim: His inauguration had the largest crowd in history.
• Truth: Photo evidence and transportation data show that Barack Obama’s 2009 inauguration had a significantly larger crowd.
8. Biggest Tax Cut in History
• Trump’s Claim: Passed the largest tax cut in history.
• Truth: While significant, his tax cut was not the largest. Lyndon Johnson and Ronald Reagan both enacted larger cuts relative to the economy’s size.
9. Increased Support Among Black Americans
• Trump’s Claim: Did more for Black Americans than any president except Abraham Lincoln.
• Truth: While his administration supported criminal justice reform, several presidents, including Lyndon Johnson, made more substantial impacts with civil rights legislation.
10. North Korea and Nuclear War Threat
• Trump’s Claim: The U.S. was on the brink of nuclear war with North Korea before his presidency.
• Truth: Tensions were high, but there was no imminent threat of nuclear war, and diplomacy with North Korea remains complex.
11. Trade Deficit with Canada
• Trump’s Claim: The U.S. had a trade deficit with Canada.
• Truth: In some years, the U.S. actually had a trade surplus with Canada.
12. U.S. Court Wins at the WTO
• Trump’s Claim: Claimed that the U.S. had never won a case at the World Trade Organization (WTO).
• Truth: The U.S. had won about 90% of its cases before the WTO.
13. Obama Left No Ventilators
• Trump’s Claim: Claimed the Obama administration left no ventilators.
• Truth: There were over 16,000 ventilators in the national stockpile when the pandemic began.
14. Sharpie-Gate and Hurricane in Alabama
• Trump’s Claim: A hurricane was predicted to hit Alabama.
• Truth: Meteorologists had not forecast the storm to hit Alabama, and Trump altered a map with a Sharpie to fit his claim.
15. FBI Prepared to “Kill Him” at Mar-a-Lago
• Trump’s Claim: Claimed FBI agents who searched Mar-a-Lago intended to kill him.
• Truth: There is no evidence supporting this claim, and it has been widely disputed as inflammatory and baseless.
These examples highlight several of Trump’s statements and corresponding facts as reported. The article notes a trend where these repeated claims create an “alternate reality” that resonates with supporters while distorting verifiable facts.
A partial listing of the significant lies and distortions Trump has been telling. He has said over 30 thousand more, but many of them are just hyperbola lies added to a true statements.
back to Index of My Rants: Tommcquaid.com
Share widley.