INDEX: Click on the item to skip to it.
In the 2020 presidential election, Donald Trump received about 74 million votes, approximately 46.8% of the popular vote12. The Republican Party has traditionally courted and often won with multiple groups of single-issue voters (The NRA, antiabortionists, wealthy business people, proponents of small government, strong military, isolationists, those against any National Debt, etc. Even though there are overlaps of ideologies, many groups only consider one issue and will put up with the rest to get their one overriding issue. Dissonance Theory tells us that even though they are only interested in one issue, they cannot simultaneously hold incompatible beliefs and will move to accept the whole conservative ideology.
To engage in a debate grounded in data, science, and logic, one must first acknowledge the limitations of other's thought processes. Why do they accept without question an authority figure who embodies their fundamental beliefs? It’s puzzling to see religious individuals embrace a man who blatantly contradicts their core values. Among White Americans who regularly attend religious services, 71% voted for Trump in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. This man has reportedly told 30,000 lies, publicly cheated on his three wives, misused his charity, defrauded his employees and business associates, and committed all of the seven deadly sins. Yet, when faced with this hypocrisy, his followers believe his claims of conspiracy, witch hunts, and shifting blame onto the accusers. I believe the explanation lies in their overriding need for authority. This factor must be considered if one aims to alter one's viewpoints
(As a former Psychology Professor and Mental Health Consultant for the Ontario Ministry of Health, I approve Brent Molnar's statement)
Brent Molnar: Voice of Reason ~ "The Man-Child in Chief: Why Donald Trump’s Behavior Isn’t Just Alarming – It’s Clinical …
At this point, calling Donald Trump a sociopath feels like stating water is wet. But throw that term around too loosely and people stop hearing it. So let’s be precise. What if the erratic cruelty, the compulsive lying, the open disdain for rules and empathy – it’s not just some quirky political branding. What if it’s a documented, diagnosable pattern? Because it is. And understanding it might be the first real step toward protecting what’s left of American democracy.
Sociopathy – officially known as Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) – isn’t some cartoonish label you slap on a villain. It’s a well-defined clinical condition. It starts early, often appearing in childhood as conduct disorder – aggression, deceit, a lack of remorse – and fully emerges in adulthood as a complete disregard for others, rules, and basic morality. It’s not about being mean. It’s about being wired to harm without guilt.
Trump’s entire life fits that arc. His father, a distant real estate baron who valued dominance over decency. His mother, emotionally unavailable. A home life that trained him not in compassion, but in conquest. And what we see now—what we’ve always seen – isn’t a break from that past. It’s the fulfillment of it. Trump isn’t unwell because of power. He got power because he was unwell in a way that ruthless systems reward.
Look at the checklist: No remorse for pain caused? Check. Disregard for laws, norms, and human dignity? Check. Chronic lying, even when it gains him nothing? Bullying those beneath him, worshipping those above? All boxes checked. And still, millions confuse his behavior for “strength.” In reality, it’s a toddler in a suit with the nuclear codes and a permanent grudge.
The tragic twist? Authoritarians and autocrats abroad have figured this out. Trump’s second-term travel itinerary is a map of manipulation. NATO leaders learned: flatter him, and he’ll do whatever you want. Putin knew it. So did MBS. So does Musk. His emotional development stopped sometime before junior high, and it shows. If you coddle the ego, you get the policy.
But let’s not sugarcoat this: Trump’s inner circle is now filled with people just like him. Not sober adults with institutional memory or democratic instincts – but fellow man-babies with vendettas, fragile egos, and no ethical guardrails. And when developmentally stunted men hold real power, they don’t just throw tantrums. They break countries.
We’re already seeing it. Arresting political opponents. Threatening judges. Openly demanding revenge. Surrounding himself with yes-men willing to torch institutions to stay in his good graces. This isn’t just a moral collapse – it’s a psychological time bomb.
So what do we do? First, call it what it is. Trump’s behavior isn’t “eccentric.” It’s pathological. Then we build movements – not just to oppose policies, but to inoculate ourselves against this style of politics. Because this isn’t just about Trump. It’s about a system that rewards antisocial traits and mistakes immaturity for strength.
We need voters to stop falling for tough-guy cosplay. We need to educate people about what this kind of psychological profile actually looks like – and why it’s disqualifying, not admirable. We need to rebuild civic life around empathy, truth, and shared responsibility. And we need to do it fast."
The number one thing to remember is that you are on a fool's errand. But the stakes are high, and we must try.
Authoritarian personality types are disposed to treat authority figures with unquestioning obedience and respect. They tend to have rigid and conventional beliefs, a fear of a dangerous world, a sense of superiority over others, and a hostility towards those who disagree with them1 2.
Authoritarian leaders often influence their followers by manipulating their fears, prejudices, and emotions to gain their loyalty and support. Authoritarian leaders often exaggerate threats, create enemies, and attack dissenters.
Persuading authoritarian followers can be challenging, as they resist change, evidence, and logic. Some possible strategies are:5 6 7 8:
Establish your authority and credibility, as they are likelier to listen to someone they respect and trust.
Find out what they value and appeal to their interests and goals, rather than trying to change their beliefs or opinions.
Use curiosity and questions to invite them to think for themselves, rather than telling them what to think or do.
Avoid confrontation and criticism, as they can trigger defensiveness and aggression. Instead, use empathy and respect to build rapport and common ground.
Authoritarian Personalities have contempt for the weak and admire high-status or rich individuals. Because they have a high value of a leader who is strong, it may be better to campaign against the authority's weaknesses and point out his weaknesses.
Provide positive feedback and reinforcement when they show signs of openness and flexibility, and acknowledge their concerns and fears.
Above advice offered by Hoover Institution scholar Larry Diamond in the American Interest magazine in 2020:
Don’t try to out-polarize the polarizer. If you stridently denounce the populist, you only mobilize his base and make yourself look like part of the hated establishment.
Reach out to his supporters' doubting elements. Don’t question their character or condescend; appeal to their interests and positive dreams.
Avoid tit-for-tat name-calling. You’ll be playing his game, and you’ll look smaller.
Craft an issue-packed campaign. The Ipsos survey shows that even people who hate the system are eager for programs that create jobs and improve education, health care, and public safety. As Diamond puts it, “Offer substantive, practical, nonideological policy proposals.”
Don’t let the populists own patriotism. Offer a liberal version of national pride that gives people a sense of belonging across differences.
Don’t be boring. The battle for attention is remorseless. Don’t let advisers make their candidates predictable, hidden, and safe.
It’s looking like this year’s elections will be won by whichever side stands for change. Populists promise to tear down systems. Liberals need to make the case for changing them in a comprehensive and constructive way.
The las 7 are from tDavid Brooks is a columnist for the New York Times.
Some background *source
About two-thirds (66%) of the voting-eligible population turned out for the 2020 presidential election – the highest rate for any national election since 1900.
White voters without a college degree favored Republican House candidates 66% to 32% in 2022.
For more information and Source(s)
1. Authoritarian personality - Wikipedia
2. 9 Signs of an Authoritarian Personality & How to Deal with It
3. 1.2.3 Authoritarian Personality - Save My Exams
4. What is an Authoritarian Personality Type? - Know Your Archetypes
5. How Authoritarians Leaders Get Away with It | Psychology Today
6. The One Way History Shows Trump’s Personality Cult Will End
7. The Essentials: Persuading People - Harvard Business Review
8. Authoritarian Personality: Followers and Leaders - Minding Therapy
The concept of the "authoritarian personality" was first developed in the mid-20th century by several researchers, notably Theodor Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel Levinson, and Nevitt Sanford. Their work, primarily through the book "The Authoritarian Personality" published in 1950, sought to understand the potential for fascist movements in democratic societies. The study attempted to correlate personality traits with the potential for antidemocratic, prejudiced, and fascist beliefs.
I think it is unfortunate that the construct was tied to a political philosophy of Fascism (the F in the F Scale is for Fascism). It is more of a construct of the way that people deal with a complex world. One of the Mantras of various psychology professors I had was, "Ambiguity creates anxiety, and anxiety leads to structure, and the structure is most often authoritarian, which simplifies many issues."
One scale is called Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA), and the second is called the Social Dominance Orientation (SDO). They have proved to be highly reliable in predicting prejudice and other characteristics associated with authoritative personalities.[10] In The Anti-authoritarian Personality (1977) W.P. Kreml found stylistic similarities between authoritarians and anti-authoritarians (dogmatism, rigidity, etc.), and that variable constructs, such as (a) the relative need for order, (b) the relative need for power, (c) the rejection or acceptance of impulse, and (d) extroversion-versus-introversion, differentiated the two types of personality, and could underpin a full-spectrum psycho-political theory.[17]
A major problem in psychology is the fact that the same upbringing can lead to opposite personalities, but there are important trends that can be filtered out statistically.
Several factors contribute to the development of the authoritarian personality:
Childhood Experiences: The roots of authoritarianism are often traced back to childhood. Strict disciplinary practices, conditional love, and a rigid upbringing can shape an individual to become more submissive to authority later in life.
Socialization: Societal norms, values, and beliefs play a role. For instance, societies that value conformity over individuality can foster authoritarian tendencies.
Fear and Insecurity: External threats, either real or perceived, can lead to a desire for order and security, often at the expense of personal freedoms. Those with authoritarian leanings tend to seek strong leaders who promise protection and order.
Cognitive Style: Some researchers argue that people with authoritarian tendencies have a distinct cognitive style, preferring simplicity to complexity, black-and-white thinking, and being uncomfortable with ambiguity.
Genetics and Biology: While the evidence is mixed, some research suggests that there may be genetic or biological predispositions towards certain personality traits, including authoritarianism.
Nature of the Authoritarian Personality: The following are some central characteristics and components associated with the authoritarian personality:
Conformity: High levels of adherence to societal and group norms, often without questioning.
Submissiveness to Authority: A deep-seated respect and obedience towards authority figures, combined with a belief that these figures are inherently correct and should not be challenged.
Aggression: A readiness to be hostile or aggressive towards those who defy societal norms or who are seen as threats, often directed at out-groups.
Conventionalism: A strong belief in traditional values, often combined with a resistance to change and a suspicion of anything different or unconventional.
Stereotyping: A propensity to categorize and judge people based on their group membership rather than individual characteristics.
Superstition and Stereotype: A tendency to believe in fate, think in rigid categories, and view the world in black-and-white terms.
Power and Toughness: A preoccupation with power dynamics, dominance-submission, strong-weak dichotomies, and a belief in the need for strong leadership to overcome threats.
Destructiveness and Cynicism: A generalized hostility and a negative worldview, often combined with a mistrust of human nature.
Projectivity: A tendency to project one's unconscious feelings and fears onto out-groups.
Sexual Repressiveness: Overly rigid views on sexuality and an aversion to non-traditional sexual practices or norms.
Link to, a measure of the Authoritarian personality.
It's important to note that not everyone with one or more of these traits has an authoritarian personality. The concept captures a specific cluster of attitudes and behaviors that tend to co-occur. While the authoritarian personality theory has been influential, it has also been criticized on methodological and conceptual grounds. Some critics argue that it oversimplifies the causes of prejudice and political extremism or that it is biased in its focus on right-wing authoritarianism and overlooks left-wing equivalents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_authoritarian_personality
It seems impossible that people with strong moral and religious feelings would support a man who is a lier (30,000 and counting), robs from his Charity, brags about, and has been found guilty in the courts of sexually assaulting women, cheating on his taxes and business dealings, is narcissistic and a braggart, and incites violence by his followers.
A study found that "the more often people went to church, the more likely they were to strongly approve of Trump."
In the Washington Post opinion by Jennifer Rubin wrote "In 2011, the think tank Public Religion Research Institute found that “60 percent of white evangelicals believed that a public official who ‘commits an immoral act in their personal life’ cannot still ‘behave ethically and fulfill their duties in their public and professional life.’
by 2016, when the number plummeted to 20 percent." It was more important to them to have a strong authoritarian leader than a moral, ethical one.
The list of causes and nature of an Authoritarian Personality is almost Identical to a description of far-right characteristics.
At the outset, it's important to note that not all followers of Donald Trump, or any other political figure, can be generalized as having the same personality type or motivations. Political movements are diverse, and people are drawn to them for a variety of reasons. However, some political scientists and psychologists have argued that certain authoritarian personality characteristics can be observed in a subset of Trump's base. Here's a breakdown using the characteristics of the authoritarian personality as a reference:
Conformity: Some of Trump's followers have been noted for their strong group identity and group loyalty, particularly at rallies where collective chants and slogans are common.
Submissiveness to Authority: Trump often portrayed himself as a strong leader capable of taking decisive actions, and this image resonated with a subset of his base who appreciated his assertiveness and decisiveness.
Aggression: Some of Trump's rallies have been marked by confrontations and aggressive acts against protesters or journalists. Trump's combative style towards those he perceived as enemies was often echoed by his staunchest supporters.
Conventionalism: Trump's slogan, "Make America Great Again," resonated with those who felt that traditional American values were under threat. This appeal to nostalgia and a perceived "better past" is consistent with conventionalist tendencies.
Stereotyping: Trump's positions on issues like immigration often relied on broad generalizations. Some of his followers adopted these views, associating entire groups with negative stereotypes. (He has a strong appeal to bigots and segregationists. They love him because "he tells it like it is"; meaning he says what they are afraid to say)
Power and Toughness: Trump's emphasis on "winning," whether in economics, international relations, or domestic politics, appealed to those who valued power and toughness. His criticism of perceived "weakness" in prior administrations or other politicians may also resonate with this characteristic.
Destructiveness and Cynicism: Some of Trump's supporters were drawn to his message because of a profound dissatisfaction with the "establishment" and a desire to disrupt the status quo.
Projectivity: Some supporters perceived threats from specific out-groups, such as immigrants or foreign nations, as being responsible for personal or national challenges.
Sexual Repressiveness: Trump's support from certain evangelical groups, despite his personal controversies, can be seen in part as a transactional relationship based on policy positions, such as those concerning abortion rights and LGBTQ+ rights.
However, while these characteristics might be observed in some of Trump's supporters, it's crucial to approach this topic with nuance:
Not all Trump supporters exhibit these traits, and not all who exhibit these traits are Trump supporters.
Many individuals supported Trump based on policy positions, economic reasons, party loyalty, or other factors unrelated to authoritarian personality traits.
The concept of the authoritarian personality itself has critics who believe it's an oversimplification or that it's biased.
Note: It's always essential to avoid overly broad generalizations and to approach such subjects with a commitment to understanding complexity and diversity.
and its validity and reliability: /source
Psychopath/sociopath scale: This is also known as Scale 4 (Psychopathic Deviate) on the MMPI. It measures antisocial behaviors and attitudes, such as impulsivity, aggression, hostility, alienation, and disregard for social norms and authority. A high score on this scale indicates a tendency toward psychopathy or sociopathy, which are personality disorders characterized by a lack of empathy, remorse, and conscience12.
Validity: This refers to how well the scale measures what it is supposed to measure, i.e., psychopathy or sociopathy. The validity of Scale 4 has been supported by various studies that show its correlation with other measures of psychopathy, such as the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (SRP) . However, some limitations of the scale include its overlap with other scales, such as Scale 9 (Hypomania), and its sensitivity to response styles, such as social desirability and faking bad .
Reliability: This refers to how consistent and dependable the scale is, i.e., whether it produces the same results when repeated under the same conditions. Various methods, such as test-retest, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability have assessed the reliability of Scale 4. The results indicate that Scale 4 has moderate to high reliability, depending on the version of the MMPI and the sample used . However, some factors that may affect the reliability of the scale include the length of the test interval, the stability of the construct, and the heterogeneity of the items.
Factor Analysis: Factor analyses of the F-scale always show the measure to be multidimensional, but the factors are always difficult to interpret and never cleanly correspond to the hypothesized components, Meaning that the traits do not always hang together. Still, there does seem to be a pattern in the Trump followers.
Factor Analysis Factor analysis of personality scores is a statistical method that can identify the main dimensions and find traits that seem to meld together that explain the variation in people’s personality traits. It can help reduce a large number of personality traits into a smaller number of factors that are more meaningful and easier to measure>
Donald Trump, though he is often called an Authority. He does not necessarily fit the characteristics of an Authoritarian Personality.
He has all of the underlying characteristics of a psychopath ( now called an antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) as described in the DMS 3 and later. (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM ))
Symptoms of a sociopath/psychopath: from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5 (DSM-5), it is a subtype of antisocial personality disorder ASPD.1
Boldness, superficial charm, pathological lying, lack of empathy or remorse, inclination to violence and psychological manipulation, impulsivity, narcissism
The checklist gives each 3 points and 30 points to fit the diagnoses. Thus only 10
Failure to conform to basic social norms, often in ways that violate the law
Repeated violation of the physical or emotional rights of others
Lack of stability in job and home life; may go through long periods of unemployment, for example, even in localities or situations where jobs are readily available
Irritability and aggression; may get into frequent fights
Lack of remorse after harming someone or their property
Consistent irresponsibility
Recklessness, impulsivity
Deceitfulness
Symptoms: Boldness, superficial charm, pathological lying, lack of empathy or remorse, inclination to violence and psychological manipulation, impulsivity, narcissism
The authoritarian personality scale is a measure of the tendency to adhere to rigid and conventional values, to submit to authority figures, and to be hostile to those who are different or deviant.
The scale was developed by Adorno et al. (1950) as part of their study of the psychological roots of fascism and anti-Semitism. They used a combination of clinical interviews, projective tests, and self-report questionnaires to identify nine dimensions of the authoritarian personality: conventionalism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, anti-intraception, superstition and stereotypy, power and toughness, destructiveness and cynicism, projectivity, and sex.
The scale was adapted for the MMPI by Christie and Jahoda (1954), who selected 30 items from the original F-scale (Fascism scale) that correlated highly with the total score and had good discriminant validity. They also added 10 items from the MMPI that measured related constructs, such as ethnocentrism and conservatism. The resulting 40-item scale was called the A-scale (Authoritarianism scale).
The A-scale has been used to study the relationship between authoritarianism and various psychological and social phenomena, such as prejudice, aggression, conformity, obedience, personality disorders, and political attitudes. However, the scale has also been criticized for its methodological and conceptual limitations, such as acquiescence bias, social desirability bias, lack of construct validity, and ideological bias.
The validity and reliability of the A-scale have been examined by several studies, with mixed results. Some studies have found evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as well as internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Other studies have questioned the validity and reliability of the scale, especially in cross-cultural and contemporary contexts. For example, Altemeyer (1981) developed a revised version of the scale, called the RWA-scale (Right-Wing Authoritarianism scale), which he claimed to have better psychometric properties and theoretical coherence. He also argued that the A-scale confounded authoritarianism with conservatism, and that the RWA-scale measured three distinct components of authoritarianism: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism.
Learn more
Factor analysis is a statistical technique that can be used to identify the underlying dimensions or factors that account for the correlations among a set of variables. It can be applied to the study of personality traits, such as the authoritarian personality, to reveal the structure and organization of the personality construct.
One of the earliest and most influential applications of factor analysis to the authoritarian personality was by Adorno et al. (1950), who developed the F-scale (Fascism scale) to measure the authoritarian personality. They used factor analysis to identify nine dimensions of the authoritarian personality, such as conventionalism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, anti-intraception, superstition, power and toughness, destructiveness and cynicism, projectivity, and sex. However, their scale and methodology were criticized for various reasons, such as acquiescence bias, social desirability bias, lack of construct validity, and ideological bias1.
Another application of factor analysis to the authoritarian personality was by Christie and Jahoda (1954), who adapted the F-scale for the MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory) and created the A-scale (Authoritarianism scale). They used factor analysis to select 30 items from the F-scale and 10 items from the MMPI that had high correlations with the total score and good discriminant validity. Their scale was more psychometrically sound and less ideologically biased than the F-scale2.
A more recent and widely used application of factor analysis to the authoritarian personality was by Altemeyer (1981), who developed the RWA-scale (Right-Wing Authoritarianism scale) as a revision of the F-scale and the A-scale. He used factor analysis to reduce the number of items to 20 and to identify three components of the authoritarian personality: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism. He also demonstrated the validity and reliability of his scale across different samples and cultures3.
Under three factors. It is scored on a three-point scale which defines severe psychopathy with a score ≥30. The items are as follows:\
Interpersonal dimension
• Glibness/superficial charm • Grandiose sense of self-worth • Pathological lying • Conning/manipulative • Lack of remorse or guilt • Shallow affect • Callous/lack of empathy • Failure to accept responsibility for own actions Affective dimension • Need for stimulation/-proneness to boredom • Parasitic lifestyle • Poor behavioral controls • Early behavioral problems • Lack of realistic, long-term goals • Impulsivity • Irresponsibility • Juvenile delinquency • Revocation of conditional release.
Christianity is not the cause of racism. Racism and Christianity are both the result of the underlying need for an Authority that will guide them. Children follow the authority figure, and if the authority figure has an authoritarian personality, that is what they often become. Trump, God, Evangelistic leaders, and the Catholic hierarchy are all given the power to decide what is right and wrong. When the authorities disagree with each other, they have no power to decide which is right critically. They can hold hugely dissonant ideas and not reject one for the other. In the present case, evangelistic leaders supported Trump, who is diametrically opposed to every tenant of their belief system. Trump, to get elected, has promised one issue that they all have in common, and that is the antiabortion issue.
Edit or delete this
Link
Trump’s approach mirrors significant aspects of Hitler’s rise to power. Both leaders exploited fear and prejudice against minority groups to consolidate support. Hitler targeted Jews as scapegoats for Germany’s societal issues; similarly, Trump has often pointed to immigrants of color as the source of America’s challenges. This strategy of creating an “enemy within” serves to unite followers through a shared sense of fear and grievance. Like Hitler, Trump presents himself as the sole solution to these problems, demanding unwavering loyalty. Hitler’s ascent occurred within a democratic framework before turning that democracy into a dictatorship, replacing national loyalty with personal loyalty to himself—a trajectory Trump appears to be emulating.
Donald Trump has been involved in various controversies throughout his career, both during his time as a businessman and as the 45th President of the United States. These controversies often raise concerns about Trump's ethics, legality, and morality. Here’s an overview of the key moral and ethical problems often pointed out by critics of Trump’s actions. Handling of Truth and Misinformation
• False Statements: Trump has been criticized for making numerous false or misleading statements during his campaigns and presidency. Fact-checking organizations documented thousands of false claims, which led to concerns about his credibility and the spread of misinformation.
• Election Fraud Claims: After losing the 2020 election, Trump persistently claimed that the election was “stolen” from him due to widespread voter fraud. These claims were debunked by courts, election officials, and audits, but they contributed to distrust in democratic institutions and processes.
2. Conflicts of Interest
• Business Conflicts: During his presidency, Trump was criticized for not fully divesting from his businesses. His properties, such as Trump hotels and golf courses, continued to operate, and some foreign dignitaries and domestic groups stayed at these locations, raising questions about conflicts of interest.
• Use of Presidential Office for Personal Gain: Trump faced criticism for using his position to promote his businesses. The most notable case involved the potential use of his Doral resort for a G7 summit, which was later canceled after widespread outcry over the ethical implications.
3. Handling of the COVID-19 Pandemic
• Downplaying the Pandemic: Trump was accused of downplaying the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic in its early stages. Despite warnings from experts, he publicly compared the virus to the flu and suggested it would go away on its own. Critics argue that this delayed a comprehensive response, costing lives and worsening the situation.
• Promoting Unproven Treatments: Trump publicly promoted unproven or harmful treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine, and even suggested using disinfectants to treat the virus, leading to widespread confusion and public health risks.
4. Ethical Issues in Foreign Policy
• Cozying Up to Authoritarians: Trump was criticized for his seemingly friendly relationships with authoritarian leaders, including Russia’s Vladimir Putin and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, raising concerns about undermining democratic values.
• Abandoning Allies: His decision to abruptly withdraw U.S. troops from Syria, abandoning Kurdish allies, was seen as a betrayal of key partners in the fight against ISIS, sparking a humanitarian crisis and damaging U.S. credibility with its allies.
5. Separation of Children at the U.S.-Mexico Border
• Family Separation Policy: Trump’s administration implemented a “zero tolerance” immigration policy that led to the separation of thousands of children from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border. The moral outrage centered on the traumatic impact this had on children, with many of them held in inadequate detention facilities. The policy was widely condemned both domestically and internationally as cruel and inhumane.
6. Impeachments and Abuse of Power
• First Impeachment (Ukraine Scandal): Trump was impeached for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress over his attempt to pressure Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, his political rival. Critics argue that this represented an abuse of presidential power for personal political gain.
• Second Impeachment (Capitol Riot): After the January 6, 2021, storming of the U.S. Capitol by his supporters, Trump was impeached again, this time for incitement of insurrection. His false claims about election fraud and his rhetoric leading up to the attack were seen as fueling the violence, raising moral and ethical concerns about his role in undermining the democratic process.
7. Racial and Social Divisiveness
• Handling of Racial Issues: Trump was frequently accused of fueling racial tensions. His handling of the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville in 2017, where he said there were “very fine people on both sides,” was widely condemned as morally and ethically irresponsible. He was also criticized for calling Black Lives Matter protesters “thugs” while showing sympathy for far-right groups.
• Muslim Ban: Early in his presidency, Trump introduced a travel ban on several predominantly Muslim countries, which critics argued was discriminatory and violated religious freedoms. The policy was seen by many as a form of Islamophobia.
8. Misuse of Pardon Power
• Controversial Pardons: Trump issued pardons to several political allies and individuals convicted of corruption, raising concerns that he was using his presidential powers for personal and political gain. Some of the controversial pardons included those for Roger Stone, Michael Flynn, and Paul Manafort, all of whom were involved in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
9. Tax and Financial Transparency
• Refusal to Release Tax Returns: Trump broke with decades of tradition by refusing to release his tax returns, leading to speculation about potential conflicts of interest and tax avoidance. A New York Times investigation later revealed that Trump paid little to no federal income taxes in several years, sparking public outcry over fairness and ethics.
• Potential Tax Evasion: The New York Times report also revealed that Trump had engaged in aggressive tax-avoidance strategies, some of which bordered on tax evasion, raising ethical concerns about his financial dealings.
10. Sexual Misconduct Allegations
• Accusations of Sexual Misconduct: Trump has faced multiple accusations of sexual misconduct, including allegations of harassment and assault from over two dozen women. While he has denied these allegations, they continue to raise serious moral and ethical questions about his behavior toward women.
• Access Hollywood Tape: In 2016, a recording emerged of Trump boasting about groping women without their consent. His remarks were widely condemned as promoting a culture of sexual harassment.
11. January 6 Capitol Riot
• Incitement of Violence: Trump’s speech and actions leading up to the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol have been widely condemned. His persistent claims of election fraud and refusal to concede defeat are seen as contributing to the violent insurrection, an event that undermined democratic norms and led to a significant loss of life and injuries.
Each of these points highlights moral and ethical concerns raised by Trump’s behavior, both as a private citizen and during his presidency. Critics argue that many of his actions have undermined democratic principles, violated ethical standards, and contributed to polarization and division in American society.
Donald Trump has been known for making numerous, more than 30,000, false or misleading statements during his presidency and beyond, many of which have had significant consequences for politics, public trust, and societal divisions. Some of the most damaging lies include the following.
The “Big Lie” About the 2020 Election Being Stolen
• Claim: Trump repeatedly claimed that the 2020 presidential election was “stolen” from him due to widespread voter fraud, despite no substantial evidence.
• Impact: This lie led to a major erosion of public trust in the U.S. electoral system, culminating in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Many of Trump’s supporters believed his claims, which fueled anger and distrust, contributing to political violence and ongoing skepticism about election integrity. It also spurred legislative changes in many states aimed at tightening voting rules, based on false premises.
2. COVID-19 Misinformation
• Claim: Trump downplayed the severity of COVID-19, claiming early on that it was no worse than the flu and would “disappear” quickly. He also falsely suggested that the virus was under control in the U.S. and promoted unproven treatments like hydroxychloroquine and even suggested injecting disinfectants.
• Impact: His downplaying of the pandemic delayed a more aggressive national response, potentially contributing to a higher death toll and increased confusion about public health measures. His remarks on unproven treatments caused some people to take risky or harmful actions. Public trust in expert advice from agencies like the CDC and the World Health Organization was undermined.
3. Charlottesville “Very Fine People” on Both Sides
• Claim: After the 2017 white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where a counter-protester was killed, Trump said there were “very fine people on both sides,” implying equivalency between white nationalists and those protesting against them.
• Impact: This statement emboldened white supremacist groups and worsened racial tensions in the U.S. It also sparked national outrage and damaged America’s standing as a country committed to opposing racism and hate groups.
4. Obama’s Birthplace (“Birtherism”)
• Claim: For years, Trump promoted the false conspiracy theory that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and was therefore ineligible to be president.
• Impact: This lie was widely condemned as racist and played a role in stoking racial animosity during Obama’s presidency. It helped elevate Trump’s political profile among conspiracy theorists and sowed doubt about the legitimacy of the nation’s first Black president, deepening divisions along racial lines.
5. Mexico Will Pay for the Border Wall
• Claim: During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly promised that he would build a border wall and that Mexico would pay for it.
• Impact: Mexico did not pay for the wall, and the funding instead became a divisive domestic political issue, leading to a government shutdown and bitter conflicts in Congress. This unfulfilled promise disappointed many of Trump’s supporters and became a symbol of political overpromising.
6. Russian Collusion Investigation as a “Witch Hunt”
• Claim: Trump repeatedly claimed that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election was a “witch hunt” and a “hoax.”
• Impact: This narrative undermined public confidence in the U.S. justice system and law enforcement agencies such as the FBI. It also contributed to political polarization around the investigation and damaged the public’s perception of the legitimacy of concerns about foreign interference in U.S. elections.
7. Climate Change Is a “Hoax”
• Claim: Trump frequently called climate change a “hoax” and downplayed the urgency of environmental concerns.
• Impact: His dismissal of climate change influenced U.S. policy, leading to the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and the rollback of environmental protections. It also fueled climate change skepticism, delaying meaningful action on a global issue with long-term consequences.
8. Muslim Ban Justifications
• Claim: When Trump introduced the travel ban on several predominantly Muslim countries, he falsely claimed it was necessary for national security and to prevent terrorism.
• Impact: The travel ban fueled Islamophobia and hurt America’s reputation as a country welcoming immigrants and refugees. The policy was seen as discriminatory and led to widespread protests, damaging U.S. relations with some Muslim-majority countries.
9. Tax Cuts Will Pay for Themselves
• Claim: Trump promised that the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would pay for itself by generating enough economic growth to offset the revenue losses from tax cuts.
• Impact: The tax cuts added significantly to the national debt, and independent analyses showed that the economic growth generated by the tax cuts was insufficient to make up for the revenue shortfall. This led to long-term fiscal concerns, including increased budget deficits.
10. Healthcare Lies (“Better, Cheaper Healthcare for All”)
• Claim: Trump promised that he would repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) with a better and cheaper healthcare system that would cover everyone.
• Impact: Trump and Republicans were unable to pass a comprehensive replacement for Obamacare, and no better healthcare plan was ever introduced. This failure to deliver on a key campaign promise left many Americans without improved healthcare options, and ongoing efforts to repeal Obamacare threatened millions of people’s health insurance.
11. NATO is “Obsolete”
• Claim: Trump repeatedly claimed that NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, was “obsolete.”
• Impact: His comments damaged relations with key U.S. allies and caused uncertainty about America’s commitment to collective defense. Though Trump later walked back these claims, the remarks created tension within NATO, a cornerstone of Western security.
12. Trade Deficit Lies
• Claim: Trump repeatedly misrepresented trade deficits, suggesting that the U.S. was “losing” money to other countries due to trade deficits, misunderstanding how trade balances work.
• Impact: His framing of trade deficits fueled economic nationalism and led to the U.S.-China trade war, which hurt American farmers, businesses, and consumers. The tariffs imposed by his administration led to higher costs and disrupted global supply chains.
These lies, among others, not only affected policy and governance but also deepened political and social divisions in the U.S. They contributed to a broader crisis of truth in public discourse, undermining trust in institutions and leaders.