I work with students who excel at 'doing school.' This can mean that they bring certain attitudes into the classroom, particularly around school as a game-like construct; unfortunately, many of my students view school as a prototypical finite game, which "is played for the purpose of winning" through accumulating the top grades, accolades, etc. (Carse, 1986, p. 3). This can sometimes make it difficult to implement lessons focused on topics outside of the game of school--students are focused on their academics and can struggle to see real-world applications (to see my attempts at providing a different model on a course level, see the STEM Design Thinking class in the Access section of this site). My teaching about advocacy, therefore, has of necessity had to focus on building in students an internal fortitude of character, and a focus on using their academic tools to first analyze and understand the world, before they set out to change it. In other words, I have to show students how playing the 'game' of advocacy is rewarding even when there is no clear 'win' state; it functions as an infinite game, where the goal is to keep playing (Carse, 1986, p. 3).
The end result is that my students are able to exercise advocacy skills in the sort of small-stakes, highly localized situations that offer them a chance to 'practice' or 'exercise' their advocacy skills, in a way that builds confidence and competence, before sending them onto their adult paths without those scaffolds. I pay particularly close attention to ensuring that they are educated about real-world injustices, including in their home communities, and can therefore form educated opinions on a variety of topics, through the use of a variety of information sources.
When teaching about advocacy, I wanted to give students a model which they could use. Modeling is an important part of teaching, but must be done "while involving the students in the thinking, the doing and all aspects of the process" (Lea, 2013). This lesson asks students to analyze the advocacy model, and then apply it to their own lives, which certainly requires a great deal of thinking. I also wanted to foreground that advocacy comes out of internal work, that prioritizes students' individual strengths and passions. The lesson plan, left, shows a lesson (prepared for a JHU class, so scroll past the first couple pages of instructions) that connects character strengths shown by the character Atticus Finch in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird to students' own self-identified character strengths.
The specific instructional strategy used in this lesson is basically textual: I am asking students to connect the character's moral strength to specific actions that Atticus takes. This creates an understanding that his actions are motivated by his moral commitments. This point will be extended over the course of the year, most explicitly in the second lesson included here. It is also important to ensure that students have a broad understanding of the historical persistence of injustices, and historically-informed fiction like To Kill a Mockingbird offers opportunities to ensure that students are educated about the historical roots of current issues.
This lesson built upon student work with the VIA Character Institute's youth survey (following the recommendation in Graves, 2016), which grounded the lesson in a strong empirical basis of sociopsychological research. It also makes explicit text and standards connections, to ensure that academic rigor isn't lost.
Student work from this lesson (left) demonstrated that they understood how Atticus' action were motivated by an internal locus of character strength (here, exemplified as a commitment to fairness). This is the necessary basis for teaching students how to apply the model to their own lives, and own issues of interest--advocacy actions must be motivated by internal commitments.
This artifact demonstrates that students have been taught with an explicit instructional strategy. I begin with the text, and then ask students to apply a general concept. Below, you will see that same strategy applied to informational text relevant to students' real-world problems.
With this internal locus established, I then moved to building the academic skills necessary to advocate effectively. Still tied in with To Kill a Mockingbird, students began to analyze classical rhetorical appeals.
Then, as we finished up the novel, we applied those skills to more immediately-relevant texts. This occurred shortly before the STAAR exams in 2022, so the lesson balanced teaching about argumentative texts and letting students exercise those skills as a practice for advocacy (see the notes at the bottom of the plan, right).
This lesson asks students to build upon the skills built up over several classes. As such, it offers students a chance to engage in the higher-order thinking necessary to effectively advocate, or to write an argument: application of information, synthesis of an argument, and careful use of rhetorical appeals (in particular, appeals to logos through the scientific path). These lessons prepare students to engage in advocacy around their own topics of interest or concern as they enter high school and, eventually, college and the workforce, without limiting their understanding of advocacy to certain 'hot-button' issues.
These artifacts demonstrates a specific instructional strategy; I scaffold the introduction of knowledge and skills for students over several lessons, then introduce a genuine problem (school start times and sleep schedules), before giving them a chance to apply those skills and synthesize an argumentative text in the included lesson plan.
Students engaged in a guided reading of informational texts about school start times (right). This provided them with an opportunity to practice argumentative writing skills (see below), and to simultaneously engage in advocacy around a real-world issue that impacts many of them. A significant portion of my students have to leave their homes at 5:00 or 5:30 AM to make it to school on time, providing relevance for this exercise in advocacy and argumentative writing. This connects to the instructional strategy of relating class material to students' lives.
These artifacts demonstrate several criteria. The first is that I have explicitly taught students about advocacy, as both a concept and a skill; the second is that I have embedded this instruction in an asset-based framework that empowers students. The third fulfilled criteria is that I have used explicit instructional strategies around synthesizing information and constructing argumentative texts to teach students about engaging in advocacy. The final criteria these artifacts demonstrate is that I have explicitly taught students about real-world problems, on both a macro scale (the To Kill a Mockingbird unit deals substantively with the character strength required to stand up and oppose a racist society) and a micro scale (it is fundamentally unfair to expect students to be productive at 7:50 AM; see below for student thoughts on this topic).
As noted above, students wrote argumentative texts arguing for or against changing start times at our school. A few examples are included below. These examples demonstrate that my students write about real issues in the world and in their lives, and that they are able to marshal teacher-provided resources to support their arguments. These examples also demonstrate that I initiate serious discussions and activities about real world issues, and that students engage in these discussion and activities.
Students engaged in a similar process for writing about how to advocate for themselves around stress-reduction. Stress reduction is a consistent theme that students report wanting more of, and, as you can see in the Culturally-Responsive Teaching section of this website, one of the commitments I made with my classes last year was to build routines and practices which reduced stress. This activity represents one instance of follow-through on that commitment, on both my part and the part of the students.
We engaged in this process the week before the STAAR exams, which traditionally see students struggle with stress, anxiety, and fear of testing. Students reported to me that they would appreciate practice with concrete skills to reduce their stress levels before exams, and so I built a lesson around that concern. We practiced several stress-reduction techniques, including visualization, stretching, breath control, and rhythmic breathing practice.
One of the products of this lesson was short reflection writings, a few of which I've included below. These writings identify useful and not-so-useful stress reduction techniques; to model the impact of effective advocacy, I gave students a few minutes at the start of each subsequent class to engage in these techniques. Students verbally reported that this helped them engage in the test-preparation classes more fully.
This process shows that students are able to engage with provided materials to advocate for themselves around a real-world issue (testing anxiety). These artifacts also show evidence of follow-through, from students raising a concern to taking specific action (practicing stress-reduction techniques) to alleviate that concern.
During late 2021, my campus decided to hold a history festival--imagine the basic structure of a science fair, but based around their history classes. Since our students tend towards the competitive side, we decided that a competition between grade levels was a strong structure to promote student interest and engagement; each grade level would take a recent decade, and create student-led presentations around a variety of topics through the lens of that topic's development in 'their' decade.
Students from each grade would attend the fair, and students would have the chance to present to each other, in groups of varying sizes. 8th grade took the 1970s, which offered the chance to let students research a variety of culturally-relevant and advocacy-based movements.
Below, I have included a set of student presentations that demonstrate an awareness of the long history of protest movements in the United States. While student names have been obscured for privacy reasons, students self-selected their research topics, and conducted their research with minimal input from me or their other teachers. For example, the students who worked on the Chicanismo presentation got an index card from me with the phrases "Brown Berets" and "Mexican American Youth Organization" on it; they kept digging and found a whole set of interrelated movements on which to base their presentation.
To assist and coach them, I guided students towards reliable sources, and modeled how to check for reliability by having them collect citation information in Zotero (a free resource, which is useful in a high-poverty area) and assessing when source information was too sparse to be reliable. I also coached students to ensure that information across sources was broadly consistent, as this reinforces source reliability. This demonstrates that my students are capable of taking the lead on investigations into historical advocacy, and grounding their understanding of advocacy in historically-informed models. These projects also demonstrate that students have developed knowledge of both current injustices and their historical roots, and have taken action to educate themselves and their peers on these topics.
Allowing students to largely self-direct their research is an instructional strategy recommended in Project-Based Learning contexts, which this overall project fits into. The Buck Institute for Education recommends that "[m]ore advanced students may... select the topic and nature of the project itself; they can write their own driving question and decide how they want to investigate it, demonstrate what they have learned, and make their work public" (BIE, 2019). As a result, students demonstrated a real enthusiasm and commitment to this research process, which resulted in an unusually thorough presentation of information.
However, a cautionary note: students struggled with how to correctly cite their information, and so these presentations contain some quotations and paraphrases from unclear sources. One of the objectives for the year was to teach students how to quote, cite, and integrate information from other texts into their own writing; this history fair, taking place midway through the year, represents students caught in a state of partial mastery. To see growth in my students' citation practices, consult the 'Dramatic Academic Growth: Qualitative Evidence' section for an in-depth look.
A pair of my students really distinguished themselves with this presentation. They included a variety of sources that I hadn't pointed them towards, including a piece of local history that surprised even some of the visitors from the district staff. You can also see that they make a real effort to correctly integrate their sources. I'm particularly proud of this pair because one of them struggled a great deal in their English class, and discovered that when they took control of their own learning, they could excel.
These students worked on documenting the early queer liberation movement. This is often a challenging topic in rural South Texas, and these students took it upon themselves to educate their peers. You'll note a lot of dangerously-close paraphrases of un-cited sources, though, and this prompted some intervention-instruction in how to paraphrase without plagiarizing, even unintentionally. Overall, this represents a real dedication by the students to learning about their chosen topic, though obviously there's progress to be made in terms of academic mastery.
These students focused on the battle around the ERA and the 'domestic' wing of the feminist movement in the 1970s (as well as antifeminist activists like Schlafly). Here, I had to provide a bit more guidance, in terms of pointing them towards specific issues and figures, though students still completed their own research. You'll also see an attempt at providing delineations between quoted and written text, though the missing inline citations make it difficult to follow; the references section at the end is a solid start, but missing inline citations is a serious error. Overall, the project represents an enthusiastic attempt to grapple with the history of debates around gender and equal protection in the United States.
The above evidence demonstrates fulfillment of the following criteria. The lesson plans demonstrate that I have explicitly taught students about advocacy, using specific instructional strategies to take a strengths-based and literature- and standards-connected approach to the topic.
The student essays demonstrate that students have written about real-world problems, using teacher-provided resources, and have engaged in follow-through to advocate for themselves, especially around stress-reduction. The practice of trying, giving feedback, and then implementing that feedback on stress-reduction techniques also gave students a chance to practice useful self-advocacy skills, which will serve them well in high school.
The student projects from the history fair demonstrate that students engaged in more-or-less self-directed research around the history of social injustices and public advocacy, which grounds their own education in a stronger sense of community. Their presentations of this research also served as public education for their peers, which itself constitutes advocacy.
Overall, the artifacts in this section shows a clear commitment to giving students the necessary skills to understand how and why to engage in advocacy for themselves and for others. This is vital preparatory work for students who, as they head into high school, are beginning to consider what their adult lives will eventually look like. By ensuring that these students have the basic skills necessary to engage in effective advocacy, students are more likely to feel that they can engage in advocacy, which is not always a common feeling in a small, rural town. This is likely to lead to more long-term follow-through from students, even when their teachers are no longer there to provide scaffolds and supports. Thus, while the artifacts included here show the short-term outcome of my teaching about advocacy, the long-term outcomes will only be visible as these students become full-fledged members of the community, and take on the work of building, maintaining, and improving their community.
Buck Institute for Education. (2019). Gold Standard PBL: Essential Project Design Elements. https://my.pblworks.org/resource/document/gold_standard_pbl_essential_project_design_elements
Carse, J. P. (1986). Finite and infinite games. Free Press. https://wtf.tw/ref/carse.pdf
Graves, K. (2016). Using Strengths to Increase Educator and Student Engagement | VIA Institute. https://www.viacharacter.org/topics/articles/using-strengths-to-increase-educator-and-student-engagement
Modeling: Essential for Learning. (n.d.). Edutopia. Retrieved October 6, 2022, from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/modeling-essential-for-learning-karen-lea