Health and forests
As a Gund Fellow at the University of Vermont, I am continuing a line of research looking at connections between human health and ecological conditions, using an interdisciplinary approach and a variety of tools from population ecology and wildlife biology. Working with a fantastic team brought together by the Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, we've already looked at links between watershed deforestation and diarrheal disease in kids (more trees upstream is associated with decreased risk for rural communities) as well as how forest cover relates to a trio of health outcomes differently for richer and poorer households (and the implications for achieving interlocked UN Sustainable Development Goals). I am working to build on these findings now by looking at how forest cover and forest biodiversity may modulate malaria risk in Madagascar and whether and how forest-dependent insectivorous bats play a role in that relationship. We're particularly interested in co-developing agroecological approaches with local communities that would deliver health and environment benefits while also helping meet subsistence needs while delivering new sources of income.
Scaling up tropical forest restoration
Much of my dissertation research at Princeton focused on the efficacy of low-cost alternatives to traditional tropical forest restoration practices. In Costa Rica's Área de Conservación Guanacaste, I found a living laboratory to examine how tens of thousands of hectares of former pasture have undergone a dramatic (and deeply heterogeneous) recovery into endangered tropical dry forest without a need for intensive replanting or site preparation. But what underpins the large heterogeneity in the recovery of floral diversity and biomass? And what does it mean for threatened fauna? In instances where conditions demand intervention to ensure recovery, can creative solutions still offer low-cost alternatives? In a case study on the ecological outcomes of an orange peel waste disposal project, we found that the answer to the last question was a resounding yes.
Currently, I'm working on a project looking at the feasibility and safety of using coffee byproducts for forest restoration in Latin America.
I'm a strong, unabashed believer in picking low-hanging fruit. If there's a way I can help deliver impactful or interesting research findings quickly and easily, I don't shy away just because it doesn't fit the narrative for a particular line of inquiry. I think it keeps you sharp and versatile as a scientist and is an excellent way to multiply the good your science does in the world. That is the thinking that lead me to help work up a languishing dataset on butterfly transects, as well as to publish a paper examining the scales at which ecologists engage in our observational research. I hope this instinct and a privileged education from some bright lights in the world of theoretical-, disease-, and population ecology and wildlife-, organismal-, and evolutionary biology continues to lead me in unexpected directions in the future.