How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-09-29 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
If you want a do-everything over-ear headphone for commuting, calls, gaming and long trips, choose TOZO HT3; if you need a headphone that survives actual swimming and lets you hear traffic while you run, choose ANSTEN Swimming Headphones. These two are built for completely different lives, and the specs make that obvious once you line them up.
• TOZO HT3 biggest strength: Hybrid active noise cancellation rated to cut up to 45dB of surrounding noise, paired with a massive 90-hour battery and a full over-ear fit.
• TOZO HT3 biggest trade-off: It's an over-ear headphone at 254g — it does not go in the water, and wearing it while swimming simply isn't an option.
• ANSTEN Swimming Headphones biggest strength: IPX8 waterproofing plus open-ear bone conduction, so you get music in the pool while still hearing what's around you.
• ANSTEN Swimming Headphones biggest trade-off: Only 8 hours of playback per charge and no wired jack, so it's a shorter-session, sport-first device.
• Who each is for: TOZO HT3 for desk, plane, train and home listening; ANSTEN for swimmers, runners and cyclists who want audio without blocking their ears.
The TOZO HT3 is an over-ear hybrid noise cancelling headphone, and the spec sheet reads like TOZO designed it to cover almost every non-water situation. Four high-sensitivity microphones drive the adaptive ANC, which TOZO rates at up to 45dB of noise reduction. In practice that's the spec that matters on a noisy subway, a plane cabin, or a shared office — the noise floor drops and you're left with your audio. There's also a dedicated call mic, so phone calls don't fall apart the moment you step outside.
Sound hardware is a 40mm dynamic driver with a 20Hz–20,000Hz frequency range and 102dB sensitivity, so it's a fairly easy load to drive. TOZO also lists a 60ms audio latency figure, which is the number to care about if you game — low enough that you're not fighting a noticeable lag between what you see and what you hear. The 32 ohm impedance means it plays fine straight off a phone without a separate amp.
Battery is where the HT3 runs away from most of the category: 90 hours on a single charge, with a 10-minute quick charge giving you roughly 9 extra hours. Charging the full cell takes about 2 hours. For a long-haul flight, a week of work-from-home calls, or a study marathon, that's a genuinely different experience from a headphone you charge every night.
Who should buy it: commuters, remote workers, students, gamers and travelers who want one headphone to handle noise, calls, movies and music. The foldable design with removable, replaceable ear pads is a practical bonus — those pads are the part that wears out first on any over-ear, and being able to swap them extends the life of the whole unit. Weight is 254g, which is normal for this class.
Who should skip it: anyone who wants to swim in their headphones. The HT3 is a dry-land product, full stop. If water resistance is your priority, this isn't the one.
ANSTEN Swimming Headphones: Who It's For
The ANSTEN Swimming Headphones S950 are the opposite philosophy. These are open-ear bone conduction headphones rated IPX8, which is the waterproofing level that actually means "you can submerge this." The housing uses a flexible titanium structure inside an ABS and silicone body, and ANSTEN explicitly points at swimming, surfing and diving as the intended use cases, with sweat, rain and splashes covered too.
Bone conduction works differently from a normal headphone. Instead of pushing air into your ear canal, a bone conduction driver sends vibration through your cheekbones to the inner ear. That's why the ANSTEN pair can sit outside your ears entirely and still deliver audio. The practical upside is situational awareness: you hear traffic, cars and warning signals while music plays. For runners, cyclists and anyone on a road, that's a real safety argument, not a marketing one. ANSTEN pairs a 13mm wideband driver with the bone conduction design for a 360° style presentation.
The critical detail for pool use is the dual-mode design. ANSTEN gives you Bluetooth 6.0 plus a built-in 8GB MP3 player that holds up to around 1500 lossless tracks. You double-click the function key to switch modes. And here's the part people miss: ANSTEN's own instructions say to switch to MP3 mode and turn off your phone's Bluetooth before swimming. That makes sense — Bluetooth signals don't travel well through water, so the onboard memory is what makes this product work in a pool at all. Buy it, load your music onto the 8GB, and you're independent of your phone.
Weight is just 26g, which is remarkably light, and the ergonomic fit is designed to stay put through intense movement. Battery is 8 hours per charge with a 2-hour charge time — fine for a week of swim sessions or a long run, but a fraction of the HT3's endurance. There's also AI noise reduction with a front microphone for calls, and directional sound transmission to limit audio leakage so your music stays private. An adjustable headband, magnetic charging cable and silicone earplugs are included in the box.
Who should skip it: anyone who wants deep noise cancelling or a fully sealed listening experience. Bone conduction trades isolation for awareness by design. It's also a 10-meter Bluetooth range versus 20 meters on the HT3, and there's no 3.5mm jack at all.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for noise cancelling → TOZO HT3. Up to 45dB hybrid ANC versus an open-ear design that intentionally lets the world in.
• Best for swimming and water sports → ANSTEN Swimming Headphones. IPX8 waterproofing with an onboard 8GB MP3 mode built specifically for underwater listening.
• Best for battery life → TOZO HT3. 90 hours versus 8 hours is not a close comparison.
• Best for long flights, workweeks and study sessions → TOZO HT3. The quick-charge feature (10 minutes for about 9 hours) suits rushed mornings too.
• Best for running and cycling near traffic → ANSTEN Swimming Headphones. Open-ear bone conduction keeps you aware of your surroundings.
• Best for gaming and low-latency video → TOZO HT3. The 60ms latency figure and 40mm dynamic drivers are aimed at that use.
• Best for wired use with older gear → TOZO HT3. AUX 3.5mm and Type-C inputs; the ANSTEN has no jack.
• Best for multipoint device switching → Either, with a caveat. Both support two-device connection, but the HT3's 20-meter Bluetooth range is double the ANSTEN's 10 meters.
If I were buying one of these for general life — commuting, calls, movies, work, travel — I'd take the TOZO HT3. The combination of adaptive ANC, 90-hour battery, wired options and dual-device connection covers far more situations, and the replaceable ear pads make it a longer-term purchase. I'd only switch to the ANSTEN Swimming Headphones if swimming is a real, regular part of my week, because that IPX8 rating and MP3 mode are things the HT3 simply cannot do. In my opinion these aren't competitors so much as two tools for two different jobs — pick the job you actually do most. Check the current price on Amazon for whichever one fits, since both sit in very different budget brackets.
The ANSTEN. It's rated IPX8 and has a built-in 8GB MP3 mode designed for underwater use. The TOZO HT3 is an over-ear headphone with no water rating listed, so it should stay dry.
Yes. In Bluetooth mode it works like a normal pair of open-ear headphones with AI noise reduction and a front microphone. Just remember to switch to MP3 mode and turn off your phone's Bluetooth before you get in the water.
The TOZO HT3 by a wide margin — up to 90 hours per charge versus up to 8 hours on the ANSTEN. Both take about 2 hours to charge fully, and the HT3 adds a quick charge that gives roughly 9 hours from 10 minutes.
The ANSTEN, in my opinion, because bone conduction leaves your ears open so you can hear traffic and warning signals. The TOZO HT3's noise cancelling is excellent for focus but works against you on a busy road.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: AOC Earbuds vs Jacuate Clip-on Earbuds Open, HyperX vs Vonaural Pro‑level Hybrid Active, Perytong Sleep Headphones vs LIHOBI Noise Reduction Ear, MIDOLA Kids vs iClever BTH22