Do

Implementation

I was extremely excited to begin this plan, as it was something I believed we could accomplish - potentially to start as soon as next year. We had our first meeting on Feb. 26 and even though some committee members were not present, it was very informative. The notes can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/18MSPL9fkenlJSVD4mszF4RzCycZx_4U-f-gHo2L5MVA/edit?usp=sharing. We were able to discuss the needs of the students entering next year, and how some of those needs could be addressed if we had a Transitional Kindergarten program on top of our regular Kindergarten classroom. We also discussed how it might attract more families into the school, which is a huge plus right now because, as stated before, our enrollment is declining. We also did some light research about other schools nearby that already have these programs, and at the end I assigned every member a school to reach out to so we could see how they run their programs, which can be found in the notes.

We then planned to meet again on March 11. I updated the committee members who weren't present on what we'd discussed, and also got their input. We then had to change the date as administration put an all staff meeting on that date, so our new meeting date was March 18. Every committee member RSVP-ed yes (either in person to me or to the Google Calendar invite I sent out, shown on the left) so this would be our first meeting with every member present. However, an obstacle completely unexpected happened....

COVID-19

On Sunday, March 15th Montana schools were ordered to close for two weeks by our governor and I had to redefine what and how I educated students within the course of a day. Schools were not informed if we were supposed to be providing instruction during this time. Under the absence of any directives, Lone Rock decided to continue education through distance learning, and would start on March 18. This gave me 72 hours to decide how I would educate my young students for the next two weeks and make packets for pickup. In addition to this, I volunteered to organize our packet pickups and drop-off, organizing paraprofessionals and teachers to work shifts and maintain safety for these volunteers and the families. Little did we know our school would be closed for the rest of the year.

This completely derailed my project, as most of my stakeholders (including myself) now had challenges to conquer that were far more immediate than the challenge I was trying to address. I looked at reviving the committee in April, but unfortunately most of my stakeholders live in areas with spotty reception or no internet access. Meeting in person was out of the question, as we were still under stay-home orders. There was (and still is) the question of what school will look like in the fall, meaning that many are not willing to change our current model until we know just what our model will be.

However, I still have hope for next year. Depending on how COVID-19 affects Montana during the upcoming year, I have confidence I can restart the committee in the late fall for possible implementation for the 2021-2022 school year. The challenge and inequities still need to be addressed, and while I am committed to tackling a few other, more immediate challenges first, I will keep striving to provide a more solid educational background for the students of my community.

SUCCESS?

At the beginning, I would say that the plan was successful in that it brought diverse stakeholders together to discuss a prominent issue facing our school. However, the plan was soon run right into the ground by the enormity of the obstacle our school, and the country, faced.


Competencies

  • Interpersonal Effectiveness was used to help me build trust and relationships with my colleagues. They started coming to me with their questions and problems as I was putting myself out there as a person who was engaged with our shared vision of making our school and district a more equitable place for students.

  • Group Processes was used to lead this group, even though we only had one meeting. I made sure all members had their voice heard, and I respected differing opinions when they were presented.

  • Explore and Challenge Inequity was used to educate others about the inequities in the classroom and to start to explore how to address the challenge in a more equitable way. We would have starting advocating for change if the closure had not derailed the project.

  • Advocacy was used to research the school boards existing policies for students entering Kindergarten, and to seek the opinions of colleague on these policies. It would have be used to advocate for policy change if the closure had not derailed the project.

Changes

If I were to make any changes to my Capstone project, I would have started it earlier, perhaps early in January. It would've given us more time to meet as a committee before schools closed. However, I didn't realize I was working on limited time.