Interior Offensive Linemen

IOL1: Tyler Booker, Alabama

Tyler Booker is a physically imposing guard with the strength, size, and toughness of an NFL starter. He’s a mauler at the point of attack, consistently overwhelming defenders with his power and grip strength. His instincts in pass protection are excellent, allowing him to quickly diagnose and pick up stunts and blitzes. He’s a steady and reliable pass blocker, particularly effective at anchoring against power rushers. In the run game, Booker flashes dominance with his strength and technique, though he needs to be more consistent with running his feet at the first level. His athletic limitations are most evident when asked to move laterally or pull into space, which could cap his upside. While he’s not a great mover, his functional quickness is adequate for schemes that keep him working in a phone booth. Overall, Booker projects as a high-floor, plug-and-play offensive lineman. Though his range is limited, his physicality, instincts, and technical polish give him a clear path to becoming a long-term NFL starter.

Grade: Round 1

IOL2: Dylan Fairchild, Georgia

Dylan Fairchild is a well-built guard with strong athletic traits and a clear skill set built around pass protection. He has good size for the position and moves well for a guard, showing smooth footwork, excellent initial quickness, and the ability to handle power, speed, and counter moves in pass sets. His awareness and instincts in picking up stunts and blitzes are also reliable, making him a steady presence in pass pro. However, his run blocking is a significant liability. He struggles to sustain blocks at the first level, offers little at the second level outside of his quickness, and doesn’t consistently finish reps. Despite his athletic ability, he lacks the hand placement and drive to be effective in the run game. Fairchild’s size, athleticism, and pass protection ability give him a path to a starting role, but his inability to consistently contribute in the run game may limit his ceiling as a full-time starter unless that part of his game improves.

Grade: Round 2

IOL3: Grey Zabel, NDSU

Grey Zabel is a highly athletic offensive lineman with excellent size, initial quickness, and natural movement skills. He plays with an explosive first step and has no issue reaching blocks at the first or second level. His ability to move in space and execute zone assignments is impressive, and he has the kind of fluidity that translates well to interior line roles. However, Zabel's pass protection needs technical development. His footwork is inconsistent, which leaves him susceptible to inside counters, and he struggles to anchor against power. He also has issues with hand placement and recovery against more polished rushers. Still, he handles speed off the edge reasonably well and flashes enough movement ability to project upside in pass pro with continued improvement. Overall, Zabel is a developmental lineman who likely fits best as an interior player but brings value with the potential to play all five positions. If he can improve his pass protection consistency, he has all the tools to become a valuable starter in the right offensive scheme.

Grade: Round 2

IOL4: Tate Ratledge, Georgia

Tate Ratledge is a physically imposing guard with great size and power. His strength at the point of attack is evident, and he shows the ability to anchor well in pass protection. Technically, he's relatively sound in his pass set and displays solid awareness against stunts and blitzes.  In the run game, Ratledge shows solid grip strength and flashes the ability to drive defenders with power. However, his lack of foot speed limits his range in pass protection and makes it difficult for him to mirror quicker defenders. While he's a decent run blocker, inconsistent pad level and a tendency to dip his head can compromise his leverage and balance. He also struggles to adjust and reach defenders at the second level or when pulling, where his athletic limitations are more apparent. While Ratledge’s overall game isn’t overly flawed, it lacks a defining strength outside of size and power. He projects as a decent guard with starting potential, but his lack of movement skills and overall athleticism may limit his ceiling.

Grade: Round 3

IOL5: Donovan Jackson, Ohio State

Donovan Jackson is a well-built guard prospect with strong grip strength and a solid anchor in pass protection. His power is evident when he gets his hands inside and establishes a firm base, often controlling the rep when technically sound. He adjusts well to inside and counter moves and can angle defenders out of run lanes when positioned correctly. However, consistency is a major issue. Jackson struggles to drive defenders in the run game, often stalemating rather than resetting the line of scrimmage. He rarely finishes blocks with authority and too often lets defenders stay in the play. His footwork is inconsistent, and he occasionally has trouble identifying and reacting to stunts and blitzes. While he's capable of handling interior quickness, he tends to struggle against elite speed, particularly when defenders force him to reset quickly. As a puller, he lacks explosiveness, and his technique doesn’t consistently make up for it. Ultimately, Jackson at his best is capable of being a fantastic starting guard, but the lack of finishing ability, inconsistent footwork, and underwhelming drive in the run game limit his ceiling unless developed.

Grade: Round 3

IOL6: Wyatt Milum, West Virginia

Wyatt Milum is a powerful offensive lineman whose strength stands out in the run game. He consistently generates movement as a run blocker and excels on reach blocks and zone assignments. He’s effective at the second level, though he could improve his ability to sustain blocks once engaged. Milum’s primary concerns stem from his limited athleticism and unorthodox pass set footwork—his slow, tiptoe-like motion limits his ability to mirror speed rushers and recover against counters. Though rarely challenged in pass protection, he struggled when tested by quickness and change-of-direction moves. His issues as a puller also reflect his limited range. While not a top tackle prospect, Milum’s strength, size, and run-blocking ability make him an intriguing developmental guard candidate for teams confident in refining his technique.

Grade: Round 3

IOL7: Jared Wilson, Georgia

Jared Wilson is a center with solid athletic traits but inconsistent execution. He shows decent strength and has the ability to reach the second level in the run game, but he struggles to sustain blocks effectively. While his initial quickness is generally good, his decision-making and instincts are a major concern, particularly in pass protection. Wilson’s ability in pass protection is solid, especially against power, but he can struggle with speed and counter moves. His pass set technique is one of his stronger points, but his ability to pick up stunts and adjust to pressure is inconsistent, especially when it’s not immediately obvious. His ability to pull is limited, and he needs to improve his hand placement and leverage to succeed at the next level. Overall, while Wilson is not a finished product, his athleticism and physical traits suggest there is potential for promising development.

Grade: Round 3

IOL8: Jake Majors, Texas

Jake Majors is an athletic center with solid physical traits but is inconsistent across various aspects of his game. His size and athletic ability are notable, and he does have the quickness to get to the second level, though he struggles with consistency in the run game. While his instincts are lacking, his pass protection shows promise, especially in his ability to anchor and handle speed rushers. His footwork can be sloppy, and he fails to finish blocks, particularly when pulling. His run blocking needs significant improvement, and he often struggles to sustain blocks at the first level. His ability to recover after losing ground is a positive, but he lacks consistency, especially against counter moves. Majors is an intriguing developmental center prospect who could eventually become a starter, especially if he is able to improve in the run game.

Grade: Round 4

IOL9: Miles Frazier, LSU

Miles Frazier is a big, strong guard who wins more with size than polish. His mass and upper-body strength allow him to absorb contact and survive bull rushes, but his inconsistent technique and limited range make him vulnerable. In pass protection, his footwork is clunky, which affects both his anchor and his ability to mirror defenders—especially when dealing with counters or quick movements. He’s functional in the run game and flashes some pop at the point of attack, but he lacks instincts and doesn’t always stay engaged through the whistle. Frazier also struggles with stunt recognition and has a habit of being a step late in passing off or picking up twists. Overall, he’s a raw player who will need continued improvement to stick in the NFL, but his size, strength, and generally well-rounded skill set give him some solid developmental upside.

Grade: Round 4

IOL10: Jonah Savaiinaea, Arizona

Jonah Savaiinaea is a big-bodied offensive lineman with flashes of impressive pass protection ability and zone run blocking. He has a solid kick step and is quick into his pass set, with the ability to mirror and stay in phase against speed when he's technically sound. His hand usage can look great at times in pass pro, but it's wildly inconsistent—he’ll often get his hands caught and lose all control of the rep. That inconsistency also shows up in the run game, where he plays too high and can be sluggish out of his stance. While he shows flashes of strength and impressive movement, he doesn't sustain blocks well and isn’t explosive when pulling. He struggles to recover if beat in pass protection and can’t always anchor despite his size. There’s clearly talent here, especially when his technique is right, but his lapses are far too frequent to overlook. He’ll need time to clean up his technique to reach his upside at the next level.

Grade: Round 4

IOL11: Luke Kandra, Cincinnati

Luke Kandra is a big, power-oriented guard who thrives in tight quarters. He plays with solid strength and effort, showing good hand placement in pass protection and the ability to stay latched on once engaged. He does well in the run game at the point of attack, using his size to generate movement and sustain blocks against defensive linemen. However, his game is limited by below-average athleticism and foot speed. He struggles to take proper angles when climbing to the second level and lacks the mobility to consistently pull or mirror quicker defenders. In pass protection, his technique is average and inconsistent. He handles power reasonably well but can be beaten by athletic pass rushers due to slower recovery. While Kandra isn't a flashy mover or finisher, his play strength and reliability in short areas give him a shot as a depth option or low-end starter in a gap-heavy scheme.

Grade: Round 5

IOL12: Seth McLaughlin, Ohio State

Seth McLaughlin is an experienced center who compensates for his limited athletic profile with solid play in a few areas. He’s at his best when he can win with leverage and angles in the run game, showing an understanding of how to position his frame to seal defenders. While he’s not explosive or dynamic at the second level, he can be effective at the first level and does a respectable job when pulling in space, even if he lacks ideal range. In pass protection, McLaughlin shows a decent anchor against power and generally holds his own, but his limited foot quickness makes him vulnerable to quicker interior rushers and counters. He’s capable of handling stunts and blitzes with decent awareness, but technical inconsistencies and limited recovery ability could cap his upside. McLaughlin projects as a solid depth piece with some decent potential if he can become more consistent overall.

Grade: Round 5

IOL13: Jonah Monheim, USC

Jonah Monheim is an athletic center prospect with impressive movement skills and one of the better top speeds you’ll see from an offensive lineman, which shows up on pulls and screens. His quickness and agility give him upside in zone-heavy run scheme, and he shows some flashes of solid footwork in that phase. However, his lack of strength is a major concern—he struggles to sustain blocks, gets tossed around in the run game, and has trouble anchoring in pass protection. His hand placement and technique are inconsistent, and his instincts can hurt him, particularly when reacting to stunts or delayed pressure. Also, he may be moved to guard eventually since his snaps are somewhat questionable at times. While there are tools to work with, especially as a mover, he’ll need significant development in play strength, functional balance, and football IQ to stick as an NFL offensive lineman.

Grade: Round 5

IOL14: Emery Jones Jr, LSU

Emery Jones is a high upside but raw offensive lineman whose athletic profile stands out immediately. Jones is fluid, explosive, and has the kind of movement skills you look for in an offensive lineman. However, his tape is extremely frustrating. He consistently lunges in both pass protection and the run game, which kills his balance and timing. His footwork is sluggish and unrefined in pass sets, leaving him especially vulnerable to speed around the edge and late counters. Despite having the physical tools to play tackle, his lack of technical polish and issues anchoring suggest a transition to guard might better suit his development. He's a plus run blocker when he's under control, showing flashes of strong leverage and pop, but those flashes are undercut by poor hand placement and inconsistency sustaining blocks. With development, the starting potential could be his outcome, but right now, he’s more traits than tape.

Grade: Round 5

IOL15: Garrett Dellinger, LSU

Garrett Dellinger is a strong, sturdy guard with a clear physical edge. He plays with natural power and can create push at the first level, and he flashes some surprising ability as a puller for a player with limited athleticism. However, his lack of refined technique and sluggish footwork are major concerns. His hand placement is spotty, and he has a tendency to stop his feet on contact, which affects his ability to sustain blocks and recover when off balance. In pass protection, he can survive against power and speed when he's squared up, but his heavy feet and inconsistent base leave him vulnerable to quicker rushers and counters. There's definitely functional strength to work with, but Dellinger will need significant technical development to stick in the NFL.

Grade: Round 6