In the past century, geopolitical power was defined by control over oil. Nations rose and fell on their ability to secure energy, build refining capacity, and manage trade routes that fed global demand. Today, we are watching history repeat itself — but the fuel isn’t petroleum. It’s silicon. More specifically, it’s the semiconductor foundries that manufacture the chips running everything from smartphones and cars to missile systems and artificial intelligence models.
The phrase “silicon sovereignty” has entered the vocabulary of policymakers, industry leaders, and strategists worldwide. It reflects a growing recognition that whoever controls advanced chip production holds leverage over innovation, defense, and economic competitiveness. In this new landscape, semiconductor foundries — those massive, billion-dollar factories that etch transistors at atomic scale — are becoming the oil rigs of the digital age.
From Oil Fields to Chip Fabs: A Shift in Global Power
The analogy between oil rigs and foundries isn’t a stretch. Both are capital-intensive, technologically complex, and strategically indispensable. Just as the global economy once depended on steady flows of crude oil, it now hinges on an uninterrupted supply of semiconductors. A shortfall in chip production can stall entire industries: the 2020–21 semiconductor shortage cut global automotive output, delayed consumer electronics launches, and cost billions in lost revenue.
Oil defined industrial power in the 20th century. Chips define digital power in the 21st. Without access to cutting-edge processors, nations cannot compete in artificial intelligence, supercomputing, advanced manufacturing, or modern warfare. Unlike oil, however, chips are not a naturally occurring resource. They are made, not drilled. And that makes the foundry — the site of production — the true strategic bottleneck.
Why Foundries Hold Outsized Power
At first glance, one might assume chip design firms like NVIDIA, AMD, or Apple wield the greatest influence. While these companies push the boundaries of architecture and performance, they depend on a handful of manufacturers to actually produce their designs. This is where the concentration of power becomes stark:
TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) commands over 50% of the global foundry market and produces more than 90% of the world’s most advanced chips.
Samsung Electronics is the other key player in cutting-edge nodes, balancing foundry and memory chip dominance.
Intel is racing to regain its footing, building new fabs in the U.S. and Europe under its IDM 2.0 strategy.
Building a new fab can cost upwards of $20 billion, require years of construction, and demand an ecosystem of suppliers ranging from lithography equipment makers like ASML to specialty chemical producers. The sheer scale, cost, and complexity mean that only a few entities in the world can operate at the bleeding edge.
That concentration has created a choke point: geopolitical rivalries now center on who controls, funds, and protects these facilities.
The Geopolitical Dimension of Silicon Sovereignty
The 20th century saw wars and alliances formed around oil-rich regions like the Middle East. Today, Taiwan — home to TSMC — occupies a similar role. The island has become a geopolitical flashpoint not only for ideological tensions between China and the West but also because of its outsized role in global semiconductor supply. A disruption to Taiwan’s fabs would send shockwaves through the global economy, equivalent to shutting off the oil supply in the 1970s.
The U.S., China, and Europe are all racing to reduce dependency and secure domestic manufacturing capacity. Policies like the U.S. CHIPS and Science Act (2022) and the EU Chips Act (2023) are designed to pour tens of billions into new fabs, subsidies, and R&D. China, meanwhile, is investing heavily in its own semiconductor ecosystem, determined to achieve self-sufficiency despite export controls that restrict access to advanced tools and designs.
The rhetoric of silicon sovereignty reflects this nationalistic drive. Countries no longer see chip production as a mere industry — they view it as infrastructure, akin to energy grids or defense systems.
For more information: https://www.kingsresearch.com/blog/silicon-sovereignty-semiconductor-foundries-geopolitics
Foundries as the “Oil Rigs” of the Digital Economy
What makes the analogy so apt is not just scarcity but the strategic vulnerability associated with reliance on foreign supply. Just as oil tankers could be blockaded or pipelines sabotaged, semiconductor supply chains are exposed to natural disasters, cyberattacks, political sanctions, and military conflict.
Moreover, chips are foundational. Energy may power economies, but semiconductors design, optimize, and manage energy flows themselves. From smart grids to electric vehicles, the world’s transition to renewable energy is inseparable from computing power. This places foundries at the center not just of tech but of climate and defense policy as well.
To frame it differently: oil rigs fueled the industrial revolution; chip fabs fuel the cognitive revolution.
The Stakes for Industry and Innovation
For businesses, the implications are profound. Supply chain diversification is no longer just a cost-saving strategy — it’s an existential safeguard. Automakers, cloud providers, defense contractors, and consumer electronics giants are all rethinking their dependencies. Some are pushing for long-term contracts with foundries, while others explore vertical integration or partnerships with governments.
Startups and research labs, too, face hurdles. Access to leading-edge silicon is often bottlenecked by foundry capacity. If cutting-edge chips are the “new oil,” then startups without access may find themselves sidelined in the race to develop AI models or quantum systems.
This scarcity underscores why governments view foundries as strategic assets. Much like oil companies once had diplomatic weight, semiconductor firms today find themselves in the crosshairs of global politics.
The Road Ahead: Securing Silicon Sovereignty
If foundries are the new oil rigs, the question is: how do nations and industries secure their share of production? The answer will likely involve a combination of strategies:
Massive Investment in Domestic Fabs: Expect to see continued government subsidies and joint ventures to expand capacity in the U.S., Europe, Japan, and India.
Diversification of Supply Chains: Companies will increasingly spread production across geographies to reduce single points of failure.
Technological Nationalism: Export controls, restrictions on advanced lithography equipment, and intellectual property disputes will become more frequent.
Resilience and Security Planning: Cybersecurity and physical protection of fabs will become national security priorities.
Yet building capacity is only part of the equation. True sovereignty requires talent, equipment, materials, and innovation. For example, without ASML’s lithography machines, even the most well-funded fabs cannot produce cutting-edge chips. Silicon sovereignty is thus not just about owning fabs but about embedding oneself in the global semiconductor ecosystem.
Conclusion: The Future of Power Lies in Silicon
The oil age shaped geopolitics, economies, and wars. The silicon age is doing the same, only faster. Control over semiconductor foundries is becoming the litmus test of a nation’s ability to compete in technology, defense, and economic growth.
When we say “foundries are the new oil rigs,” we’re really pointing to a broader truth: the centers of power in the digital economy are shifting from resource extraction to precision fabrication. The winners of the 21st century will be those who not only design but also control the means of producing the most advanced silicon.
The stakes of silicon sovereignty are existential — not just for nations but for industries, innovators, and individuals whose lives increasingly depend on digital infrastructure. Just as oil once powered the modern world, semiconductors now define it. The battle over fabs is not just about chips; it’s about who will shape the future.
Browse Related Article:
Top 7 Digital Health Startups Revolutionizing Patient Monitoring in Japan
AI Game Masters: How Japan’s Studios Are Designing Adaptive Game Worlds
Ryght AI & Biorasi Partner on AI Feasibility for Biopharma